U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Updated July 13, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33640 U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Summary Even though the United States has reduced the number of warheads deployed on its long-range missiles and bombers, consistent with the terms of the 2010 New START Treaty, it is also developing new delivery systems for deployment over the next 10-30 years. The 117th Congress will continue to review these programs, and the funding requested for them, during the annual authorization and appropriations process. During the Cold War, the U.S. nuclear arsenal contained many types of delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons. The longer-range systems, which included long-range missiles based on U.S. territory, long-range missiles based on submarines, and heavy bombers that could threaten Soviet targets from their bases in the United States, are known as strategic nuclear delivery vehicles. At the end of the Cold War, in 1991, the United States deployed more than 10,000 warheads on these delivery vehicles. With the implementation of New START completed in February 2018, the United States is limited to 1,550 accountable warheads on these delivery vehicles, a restriction that will remain in place through February 2026, while New START Treaty remains in force. At the present time, the U.S. land-based ballistic missile force (ICBMs) consists of 400 land- based Minuteman III ICBMs, each deployed with one warhead, spread among a total of 450 operational launchers. This force is consistent with the New START Treaty. The Air Force has modernized the Minuteman missiles, replacing and upgrading their rocket motors, guidance systems, and other components, so that they can remain in the force through 2030. It has initiated a program to replace these with a new Ground-based Strategic Deterrent beginning around 2029. The U.S. ballistic missile submarine fleet currently consists of 14 Trident submarines. Each can carry 20 Trident II (D-5) missiles—a reduction from 24 missiles per submarine—with the total meeting the launcher limits in the New START Treaty. The Navy converted 4 of the original 18 Trident submarines to carry nonnuclear cruise missiles. Nine of the submarines are deployed in the Pacific Ocean and five are in the Atlantic. The Navy also has undertaken efforts to extend the life of the missiles and warheads so that they and the submarines can remain in the fleet past 2020. It has designed and is beginning production of the new Columbia class submarine that will replace the existing fleet beginning in 2031. The U.S. fleet of heavy bombers includes 20 B-2 bombers and 40 nuclear-capable B-52 bombers. The B-1 bomber is no longer equipped for nuclear missions. This fleet of 60 nuclear-capable aircraft is consistent with the U.S. obligations under New START. The Air Force has begun to retire the nuclear-armed cruise missiles carried by B-52 bombers, leaving only about half the B- 52 fleet equipped to carry nuclear weapons. The Air Force plans to procure both a new long-range bomber, known as the B-21, and a new long-range standoff (LRSO) cruise missile during the 2020s. DOE is also modifying and extending the life of the B61 bomb carried on B-2 bombers and fighter aircraft and the W80 warhead for cruise missiles. The Obama Administration completed a review of the size and structure of the U.S. nuclear force, and a review of U.S. nuclear employment policy, in June 2013. This review advised the force structure that the United States has deployed under the New START Treaty. The Trump Administration completed its review of U.S. nuclear forces in February 2018, and reaffirmed the basic contours of the current U.S. force structure and the ongoing modernization programs. The Trump Administration also deployed a new low-yield warhead on Trident II (D-5) missiles. The Biden Administration will begin its review of U.S. nuclear posture in July 2021 and plans to complete this review in early 2022. Congress will review plans for U.S. strategic nuclear forces and will likely assess the costs of these plans in the current fiscal environment. Congressional Research Service U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Background: The Strategic Triad ....................................................................................... 3 Force Structure and Size During the Cold War ............................................................... 3 Force Structure and Size After the Cold War .................................................................. 4 Current Force Structure and Size.................................................................................. 7 Strategic Nuclear Delivery Vehicles: Post-Cold War Reductions and Current Modernization Programs ............................................................................................. 10 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) ................................................................. 10 Peacekeeper (MX) .............................................................................................. 10 Minuteman III ................................................................................................... 10 Minuteman Modernization Programs..................................................................... 13 Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) ............................................................ 17 Minuteman III Life Extension as an Alternative to GBSD ......................................... 21 W87-1 Warhead ................................................................................................. 22 Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles....................................................................... 24 The SSGN Program ............................................................................................ 25 The Backfit Program........................................................................................... 25 Basing Changes ................................................................................................. 26 Warhead Loadings .............................................................................................. 26 Modernization Plans and Programs ....................................................................... 27 The Columbia Class Submarine ............................................................................ 32 Bombers ................................................................................................................ 37 B-1 Bomber....................................................................................................... 37 B-2 Bomber....................................................................................................... 38 B-52 Bomber ..................................................................................................... 41 B-21 Bomber ..................................................................................................... 46 Sustaining the Nuclear Weapons Enterprise ................................................................. 49 Issues for Congress ....................................................................................................... 51 Force Size .............................................................................................................. 52 Force Structure........................................................................................................ 55 Debate About the Need for a Triad ........................................................................ 55 Debate About Specific Legs of the Triad ................................................................ 56 Debate About Low-Yield Weapons........................................................................ 58 The Cost of Nuclear Weapons.................................................................................... 59 Figures Figure 1. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Weapons: 1960-1990 .......................................................... 3 Figure 2. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: 1991-2020 ............................................................. 5 Tables Table 1. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces Under START I and START II..................................... 6 Table 2. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces under New START .................................................... 8 Congressional Research Service U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Contacts Author Information ....................................................................................................... 62 Congressional Research Service U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues Introduction During the Cold War, the U.S. nuclear arsenal contained many types of delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons. These included short-range missiles and artillery for use on the battlefield, medium-range missiles and aircraft that could strike targets beyond the theater of battle, short- and medium-range systems based on surface ships, long-range missiles based on U.S. territory and submarines, and heavy bombers that could threaten Soviet targets from their bases in the United States. The short- and medium-range systems are considered nonstrategic nuclear weapons and have been referred to as battlefield, tactical,