Adelaide Law Review 2014 Vol 35 No 2

Adelaide Law Review 2014 Vol 35 No 2

Adelaide Adelaide Law Law Review Review 2014 2014 Adelaide Law Review 2014 TABLETABLE OFOF CONTENTSCONTENTS ARTICLES THEHaroldTHE 2011 2011 H JOHNBruff JOHN BRAY BRAYThe ORATION ORATION President and Congress: Separation of Powers in the United States of America 205 DavidLukDavide Irvine BeckIrvine TheFrFr eeEstabeedomdomlishment and and Security: Security: Clause Maintaining Maintaining of the Australian The The Balance Balance 295295 Constitution: Three Propositions and a Case Study 225 ARTICLESJonathanARTICLES Crowe Coherence and Acceptance in International Law: Can THETHE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OFOF ADELAIDEADELAIDE JamesJames Allan Allan and and HumanitarianismTimeTime and and Chance Chance and and and Humanthe the Prevailing Prevailing Rights Orthodoxy Orthodoxybe Reconciled in in ? 251 ADELAIDEADELAIDE LAWLAW REVIEWREVIEW AnthonySandraAnthony PruimSenanayake Senanayake EthnocideLegalLegal Academia Academia and Indigenous Happeneth Happeneth P eoples:to to Them Them Article All All — — A 8A ofStudy Study the Declarationofof the the Top Top Law onLaw the Journals Journals Rights of of of Australia Australia Indigenous and and New PeoplesNew Ze Zealandaland 269307307 ASSOCIATIONASSOCIATION Peter Devonshire Indigenous Students at Law School: Comparative LaurentiaLaurentia Mc McKessarKessar PerspectivesThreeThree Constitutional Constitutional Themes Themes in in the the High High Court Court 309 Jennifer Anderson Juvofofenile Australia: Australia: Courts 1 1 September –September An Australian 2008–19 2008–19 Innovation? June June 2 2010100 331347347 Elizabeth Wren and ‘Guilty, Your Honour’: Recent Legislative Developments ThanujaLoranaThanuja Rodrigo BartelsRodrigo onUnconscionable Unconscionablethe Guilty Plea Demands Demands Discount Under Under and anOn-Demand On-Demand Australian Guarant Guarant Capitaleeee s:s: TerritoryAA Case Case of Caseof Wrongful Wrongful Study ExploitationE onExploitationxploitationxploitation its Operation 361361361 ADELAIDEADELAIDE Michael Duffy Towards better disclosure of corporate risk – a look NicolaNicola McGarrity, McGarrity, SunsetSunset Clauses Clauses in in Australian Australian Anti-Terror Anti-Terror Laws Laws 399399 at risk disclosure in periodic reporting 385 RishiRishi Gulati Gulati and and LAWLAW REVIEWREVIEW GeorgeREVIEWGeorge Williams Williams ESSAYS John Gava What We Know About Contract Law and Transacting MatthewMatthew Groves Groves in ThetheThe MarketplaceHardiman Hardiman Rule Rule — A Review Essay of Catherine 427427 Mitchell, Contract Law and Contract Law Practice: IanIan Murray Murray BridgingTravelTravel to tothe Invigorate Invigorate Gap Between the the Mind Mind Legal and and Reasoningthe the Wallet: Wallet: and CommercialDoDo the the In Intete rnationalExpectationrnational Tax Tax Rules andRules Jonathan Appropriately Appropriately Morgan, ContractEncourageEncourage Law United United Minimalism: States–Australian States–Australian A Formalist Academic Academic Restatement Visits? Visits? 455455 of Commercial Contract Law 409 GeoffreyPGeoffreyeter Burdon, Lindell Lindell ReflectingInIn Defence Defence on of of The TheHannah High HighArendt Court Court and— — Its ItsEichmann Role Role as as an an Gabrielle Appleby, in AgentJAgenterusalem: of of Constitutional Constitutional A Report on Change Change the Banality of Evil 427505505 Rebecca LaForgia, JoyceJoeJoyce McIntyre Chi Chi and and and Doing Doing BBusiness Businessusiness to to do do Good: Good: MirandaNgaireMiranda Naffine StewartS Stewarttewart 537537 CASECASE NOTES NOTESNOTES Prudence Buckland Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 311 ALR 320: RichardRichard Sletvold Sletvold PGAPGA V V The The Queen: Queen: Do Do Laws Laws Just Just Disappear? Disappear? 573573 Opinion Evidence and Reliability: A Sticking Point 449 BOOKJeromeBOOK REVIEW REVIEWSquires Google Spain SL v Agencia Española De Protección De Datos (European Court Of Justice, C-131/12, PePeteterr Burdon Burdon 13Property PropertyMay 2014) Rights Rights and and Sustainability: Sustainability: The The Evolution Evolution 463 ofof Property Property Rights Rights to to Meet Meet Eco Ecolologicalgical Challenges Challenges 581581 Vol Vol 35 35 Vol 35 BOOK REVIEWS SUBMISSIONMarSUBMISSIONgaret White OF OF MA MANUSCRIPTSNUSCRIPTSJurisprudence as Practical Reason: A Celebration 586586 of the Collected Essays of John Finnis Edited by VOLUMEVOLUME 3535 NUMBERNUMBER 22 Mark Sayers and Aladin Rahemtula 473 No No 2 2 No 2 AdelaideAdelaide Law Law Review Review Association Association AdelaideAdelaide Law Law School School TheThe University University of of Adelaide Adelaide AdelaideAdelaide SASA 50055005 AUSTRALIAAUSTRALIA ADVISORY BOARD Emeritus Professor W R Cornish Emeritus Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law University of Cambridge United Kingdom Professor J R Crawford Whewell Professor of International Law University of Cambridge United Kingdom Emeritus Professor M J Detmold Adelaide Law School The University of Adelaide South Australia The Hon Professor J J Doyle Former Chief Justice Supreme Court of South Australia Emeritus Professor R Graycar Sydney Law School The University of Sydney New South Wales Professor J V Orth William Rand Kenan Jr Professor of Law The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States of America Emeritus Professor I Shearer Sydney Law School The University of Sydney New South Wales Professor J M Williams Adelaide Law School The University of Adelaide South Australia ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Editors Gabrielle Appleby Paul Babie John Gava Book Review Editor Gabrielle Appleby Senior Student Editors Emily Bell Seb Tonkin Student Editors Prudence Buckland Laira Krieg Alexander Chan Jordan Phoustanis Sophie Flaherty Holly Ritson Samantha Graham Jerome Squires Mark Hautop Alyse Walter Publications Officer Panita Hirunboot Volume 35 Issue 2 2014 The Adelaide Law Review is a refereed journal that is published twice a year by the Adelaide Law Review Association of the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide. A guide for the submission of manuscripts is set out at the back of this issue. Articles and other contributions for possible publication are welcomed. Copies of the journal may be purchased, or a subscription obtained, from: Administrative Officer For North America: Adelaide Law Review Association William S Hein & Co Adelaide Law School 1285 Main Street The University of Adelaide Buffalo NY 14209 South Australia 5005 USA AUSTRALIA e-mail: <[email protected]> <http://www.adelaide.edu.au/press/journals/law-review> This volume may be cited as: (2014) 35 Adelaide Law Review The articles in this volume are published in 2014. ISSN 0065-1915 © Copyright is vested in the Association and, in relation to each article, in its author, 2014. TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES Harold H Bruff The President and Congress: Separation of Pow ers in the United States of America 205 Luke Beck The Establishment Clause of the Australian Constitution: Three Propositions and a Case Study 225 Jonathan Crowe Coherence and Acceptance in International Law: Can Humanitarianism and Human Rights be Reconciled? 251 Sandra Pruim Ethnocide and Indigenous Peoples: Article 8 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 269 Peter Devonshire Indigenous Students at Law School: Comparative Perspectives 309 Jennifer Anderson Juvenile Courts – An Australian Innovation? 331 Elizabeth Wren and ‘Guilty, Your Honour’: Recent Legislative Developments Lorana Bartels on the Guilty Plea Discount and an Australian Capital Territor y Case Study on its Operation 361 Michael Duffy Towards better disclosure of corporate risk – a look at risk disclosure in periodic reporting 385 REVIEW ESSAYS John Gava What We Know About Contract Law and Transacting in the Marketplace — A Review Essay of Catherine Mitchell, Contract Law and Contract Law Practice: Bridging the Gap Between Legal Reasoning and Commercial Expectation and Jonathan Morgan, Contract Law Minimalism: A Formalist Restatement of Commercial Contract Law 409 Peter Burdon, Reflecting on Hannah Arendt and Eichmann Gabrielle Appleby, in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil 427 Rebecca LaForgia, Joe McIntyre and Ngaire Naffine CASE NOTES Prudence Buckland Honeysett v The Queen (2014) 311 ALR 320: Opinion Evidence and Reliability: A Sticking Point 449 Jerome Squires Google Spain SL v Agencia Española De Protección De Datos (European Court Of Justice, C-131/12, 13 May 2014) 463 BOOK REVIEWS Margaret White Jurisprudence as Practical Reason: A Celebration of the Collected Essays of John Finnis Edited by Mark Sayers and Aladin Rahemtula 473 Harold H Bruff* THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS: SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ABSTRACT Although the framers of the Australian Constitution adopted many features of the United States Constitution, they rejected the separation of legislative and executive power in favour of responsible government in a parliamentary system like that of the United Kingdom. In doing so, Australians depended on existing conventions about the nature of respon- sible government instead of specification of its attributes in constitutional text. The United States Constitution contains detailed provisions about separation of powers, but unwritten conventions have produced some central features of American government. This article reviews conven- tions developed by Congress that constrain Presidents in the domestic sphere with regard to the appointment of executive and judicial officers and the funding of the federal government. The article then reviews conventions

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    281 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us