Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology: G Interdisciplinary Volume 21 Issue 2 Version 1.0 Year 2021 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Online ISSN: 0975-4172 & Print ISSN: 0975-4350 SARS-CoV-2 is an Robot Bioweapon By Li-Meng Yan & Adrian David Cheok Professional University of Information and Management for Innovation (iUniversity) Abstract- Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In our earlier paper titled "Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification as a Biological Robot Rather than Natural Evolution and Delineation of its Probable Synthetic Route", we disproved the possibility of SARS- CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak. These viruses (the RaTG13 bat coronavirus, a series of pangolin coronaviruses, and the RmYN02 bat coronavirus) reportedly share high sequence homology with SARS-CoV-2 and have altogether constructed a seemingly plausible pathway for the natural evolution of SARS- CoV-2. Here, however, we use in-depth analyses of the available data and literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist in nature and their sequences have been fabricated. In addition, we also offer our insights on the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated naturally from a coronavirus that infected the Mojiang miners. GJCST-G Classification: J.3 SARSCoV2IsanRobotBioweapon Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of: © 2021. Li-Meng Yan & Adrian David Cheok. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non- commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. SARS-CoV-2 is an Robot Bioweapon Li-Meng Yan α & Adrian David Cheok σ Abstract- Two possibilities should be considered for the origin I. Introduction of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In our earlier paper titled "Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 ARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus and the Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification as causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic. a Biological Robot Rather than Natural Evolution and Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of S Delineation of its Probable Synthetic Route", we disproved the SARS-CoV-2, however, has been a topic of great possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution controversy. In our first paper titled "Unusual Features of 2021 and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be Laboratory Modification as a Biological Robot Rather than Year downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally Natural Evolution and Delineation of its Probable 69 because the natural origin theory remains supported by Synthetic Route"1, we used biological evidence and in- several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the depth analyses to show that SARS-CoV-2 must be a outbreak. These viruses (the RaTG13 bat coronavirus, a series laboratory product, which was created by using a of pangolin coronaviruses, and the RmYN02 bat coronavirus) template virus (ZC45/ZXC21) owned by military research reportedly share high sequence homology with SARS-CoV-2 laboratories under the control of the Chinese and have altogether constructed a seemingly plausible Communist Party (CCP) government. In addition, pathway for the natural evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Here, however, we use in-depth analyses of the available data and resources and expertise are all in place in the Wuhan literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do Institute of Virology (WIV) and related, other CCP- not exist in nature and their sequences have been fabricated. controlled institutions allowing the creation of SARS - In addition, we also offer our insights on the hypothesis that CoV-2 in approximately six months. SARS-CoV-2 may have originated naturally from a coronavirus What have not been fully described in our earlier that infected the Mojiang miners. analyses are details of the novel animal coronaviruses Revelation of these virus fabrications renders the published by the CCP-controlled laboratories after the natural origin theory unfounded. It also strengthens our earlier 1 G outbreak . While no coronaviruses reported prior to 2020 () assertion that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of laboratory share more than 90% sequence identity with SARS-CoV- modification, which can be created in approximately six 22,3, these recently published, novel animal months using a template virus owned by a laboratory of the 4 People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The fact that data fabrications coronaviruses (the RaTG13 bat coronavirus , a series of 5-8 were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV-2 further pangolin coronaviruses , and the RmYN02 bat implicates that the laboratory modification here is beyond coronavirus9) all share over 90% sequence identities simple gain-of-function research. with SARS-CoV-2. As a result, these SARS-CoV-2-like The scale and the coordinated nature of this scientific viruses have filled an evolutionary gap and served as the fraud signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of founding evidence for the theory that SARS-CoV-2 has a academic research and public health. As a result of such natural origin10-12. In this report, we provide genetic and corruption, damages have been made both to the reputation other analyses, which, when combined with recent of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global 13-21 community. findings , prove that these novel animal coronaviruses Importantly, while SARS-CoV-2 meets the criteria of a do not exist in nature and their genomic sequences are bioweapon specified by the PLA, its impact is well beyond results of fabrication. what is conceived for a typical bioweapon. In addition, records a) Evidence proving that the RaTG13 virus is fraudulent indicate that the unleashing of this weaponized pathogen and does not exist in nature should have been intentional rather than accidental. We rd therefore define SARS-CoV-2 as an Unrestricted Bioweapon On February 3 , 2020, Dr. Zhengli Shi and and the current pandemic a result of Unrestricted Biowarfare. colleagues published an article in Nature titled “A We further suggest that investigations should be carried out on pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XXI Issue II Version I the suspected government and individuals and the of probable bat origin” (manuscript submitted on responsible ones be held accountable for this brutal attack on January 20th)4, which was one of the first publications to the global community. identify SARS-CoV-2 as the pathogen causing the disease now widely known as COVID-19. Also reported in this article was a novel bat coronavirus named Author α: Rule of Law Society & Rule of Law Foundation, New York, NY, USA. e-mail: [email protected] RaTG13, the genomic sequence of which was shown to Author σ: Professional University of Information and Management for be 96.2% identical to that of SARS-CoV2. The close Innovation (iUniversity), Tokyo, Japan. e-mail: [email protected] evolutionary relationship between RaTG13 and SARS- ©2021 Global Journals SARS-CoV-2 Is an Robot Bioweapon CoV-2 as suggested by the high sequence identity had GenBank, which in this case is equivalent to the led to a conclusion that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural existence of an assembled viral genomic sequence and origin. These striking findings have consequently made its associated sequencing reads, is not a definitive proof this article one of the most cited publications in the that this viral genome is correct or real. currently overwhelmed field of coronavirus research. Sequencing of a viral RNA genome requires Interestingly, an article published by Dr. Yong-Zhen amplifying segments of it using reverse transcriptase Zhang and colleagues on the same issue of Nature, PCR (RT-PCR) as the first step. The products of the RT- which also discovered SARS-CoV-2 as the responsible PCR, which are double-stranded DNA, would pathogen for COVID19, received much less citations2. subsequently be sent for sequencing. The resulted This latter article made no mention of RaTG132. Instead, sequencing reads, each ideally revealing the sequence Zhang and colleagues showed that, evolutionarily, of a segment of the genome, are then used to assemble SARS-CoV-2 was closest to two bat coronaviruses, the genome of the virus under study (Figure 1A). 2021 ZC45 and ZXC21, both of which were discovered and Typically, some segments of the genome may not be characterized by military research laboratories under the covered by the initial round of sequencing. Therefore, 3 Year control of the CCP government . Immediately after the gap filling will be carried out, where these missing publication of this article, Dr. Zhang’s laboratory was segments will be amplified specifically and the DNA 70 shut down by the CCP government with no explanations products subsequently sequenced. These steps are offered22. repeated until a complete genome can be assembled, Since its publication4, the RaTG13 virus has ideally with a proper depth to ensure accuracy. served as the founding evidence for the theory that However, this process leaves room for potential SARSCoV-2 must have a natural origin10. However, no fraud.