ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 6 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy December 2015 The Psychological Trauma on Boko Haram Victims in Nigeria: Conflict Resolution Perspective Isaac Terungwa Terwase1 Asmat-Nizam Abdul-Talib2 Knocks Tapiwa Zengeni2 Joyce Mcivir Terwase3 1Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia Corresponding Author: [email protected] 2School of International Studies, College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia 3Department of Psychology, Benue State University, P.M.B. 102119, Makurdi, Nigeria Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s4p519 Abstract The Nigerian State before 1999 was ruled by the military for a very long period of time ranging from 1966-1979, and 1983-1999 they have stayed in power and control of Nigerian leadership. Within the said periods, the country was mostly led by the Northern leadership especially from 1983-1999 where leaders such as Buhari 1983-1985, Babangida 1985-1993, Abacha 1993-1998 and Abubakar 1998-1999 were all from the North. On the 29th of May, 1999 ushered in the return to democratic rule and power was shifted to the Southern part of the country under the leadership of Obasanjo 1999-2007. There was in place the principle of zoning and rotation of power between the North and South so as to promote the principle of peace, fairness, equity and justice as it was enshrined within the constitution of the ruling party, the PDP. May 29th, 2007 brought in another power shift from the South to the North through the leadership of Yar’Adua, who later died in office on the 5th of May, 2010. Thus, the Vice-President took over power and it returned to the South, he contested in 2011 elections, was opposed by some quarters from the North where violence broke out and the Boko Haram became a tool as posits by late Gen. Andrew Azazi. The objective of the paper is to seek redress on how the conflict can be resolved and to bring to the fore the psychological trauma that the victims have undergone. The paper recommends that the root causes of the conflict should be re-addressed and resolved. Keywords: Psychological trauma, Boko Haram victims, Zoning, Nigeria, Conflict resolution. 1. Introduction The quest for leadership in Nigeria remains an issue for political tussle over the years. This was witnessed during the political era of the civilians from 1960 to 1966 and that of the military era from 1966 to 1979 as well as 1983 to 1999. Nigeria, a country with diverse ethnic nationalities and multi-religious worshipers is faced with a fact that leadership cannot be ignored but who to put in position of authority to lead is the major issue. However, the notion of ethnic differences begot the quest for leadership between the North and South. As far back as 1914, the country before she gained her independence was ruled by the British authorities whom through their leadership amalgamated the North and South to form an entity called Nigeria. The country was ruled by the British authorities from her period of formation when the two protectorates were amalgamated in 1914 by the then leader, Lord Lugard. Afterward, Nigeria was under their leadership from 1914 to 1960 when she gained her independence. However, gaining independence from the white people still could not solve the ethnic differences within the context of majority and minority question between the periods of 1960 to 1966 (Akinboye and Anifowose, 2008). The ethnic differences among other issues later led to the military takeover in 1966 and that created an environment for military rule from 1966 down to 1979 when the leadership of Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo conducted elections that ushered in the return to democratic rule on the 1st of October, 1979. Nigeria as a nation, vastly endowed with diverse ethnic nationalities should rather serve as a source of unity in diversity for the purpose of promoting oneness 519 ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 6 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy December 2015 amongst the people. This is one of the reasons why zoning of political positions came into place so that no section of the country would be left behind into the quest for power distribution among the different ethnic groups and to benefit the sharing formula between the North and South. In this regard, between the periods of 1979-1983, the country’s leadership came from the North under the leadership of Alhaji Shehu Shagari who hails from Sokoto State, while the Vice President came from the Southern part of the country in person of Chief Alex Ekwueme. This was done in such a way that, power was divided between the North and South in order to promote unity in diversity among the Nigerian people. Another view was to promote Nigerian unity through integration of religious diversity having the President, Shehu Shagari as a Muslim and the Vice-President, Alex Ekwueme as a Christian (Ayantayo, 2009). This is the same practice as it was introduced in 1999 when the Military handed over power to a democratically elected government under the leadership of President Olusegun Obasanjo and Vice-President Atiku Abubakar of whom the President was a Christian and that of the Vice, a Muslim. Again power was divided between the North and South since the President came from the South and the Vice from the North. The arrangement was made for the purpose of power sharing between the North and South periodically. However, the zoning/rotation of power between the North and South only lasted from 1999-2007 since it was truncated in 2011 and that created an atmosphere for conflict in Nigeria. 2. Objectives of the Paper The objectives of the research paper therefore are: i. To seek redress on how the conflict between the North and South can be resolved for the purpose of achieving a harmonious relationship between the two regions, and enhancing political stability within the country Nigeria. ii. To bring to the fore, the psychological trauma that the victims of the Boko Haram attack went through. iii. To bridge the gap between the six geopolitical regions for the purpose of enhancing peace and security, and uniting the ethno-religious differences in Nigeria. 3. Theoretical Framework This work intends to fixture in the integration theory which is classified into three major descriptions namely subnational, national and international. However, the paper focuses on subnational and national to reflect the content therein. The big question is why integration theory? How then can it be applicable to this work? The work of Lijphart (1971) has been looked at, and it brings the integration theory into the different dimensions that have been mentioned above, and it is intended to be used in analyzing this work, as subnational refers to the states of the federation in Nigeria and national in the dimension of integrating the people of Nigeria who are from different ethnic backgrounds and a variation of religious backgrounds. The country is subdivided into thirty-six (36) States of the federation and these States are represented within the context of six geo-political zones. This work aims at promoting unity in diversity through the integration of the people from all perspectives. 4. Discussion 4.1 The Historical Background: Analyzing the historical background of Nigerian leadership. Table 1: The leadership of Nigeria between the North and South 1966-2015 S/No. Name (Head of State/President) Region Religion 1 Gen. Yakubu Gowon (1966-1975) North Christian 2 Gen. Murtala Mohammed (1975-1976) North Muslim 3 Major-Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo (1976-79) South Christian 4 President Shehu Shagari (1979-1983) North Muslim 5 Major-General M. Buhari (1983-1985) North Muslim 6 Gen. Ibrahim Babangida (1985-1993) North Muslim 7 Ernest Shonekan (1993-1993) South Christian 8 Gen. Sani Abacha (1993-1998) North Muslim 9 Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar (1998-1999) North Muslim 520 ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 6 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy December 2015 Term The Return of Nigerian Democratic Rule in 1999 1999-2003 President Olusegun Obasanjo (4 years) South Christian 2003-2007 President Olusegun Obasanjo (4 years) South Christian 2007-2010 President Umaru Yar’Adua (2 years ) 341 days North Muslim 2010-2011 President Goodluck Jonathan (1 year) 25 days South Christian 2011-2015 President Goodluck Jonathan (4 years) South Christian Source: Akinboye and Anifowose, (2008); and Ayantayo, (2009). 4.2 The Military Rule in Nigeria The Table 1 above, took a dimension of understanding how the Nigerian State has been ruled by her leaders from 1966- 2015 with the view of providing a deeper understanding on what created the atmosphere that led to the conflict between the North and South. From the table as seen above, from 1966-1979, those were the days and years of military rule in Nigeria. The military government took over power from the civilian on the 15th of January, 1966 after the coup which was organized by the Igbo from the Southern (Present South-East) part of the country. The coup took away the lives of many prominent Northerners such as the Sultan of Sokoto, Ahmadu Bello and the Prime Minister of Nigeria, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa (Akinboye and Anifowose, 2008). The Northerners on the other hand, organized another counter coup that led to the killing of the Nigerian Head of State, Major-General Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi. After that, a Northerner, a Christian and of minority ethnic group was made the Head of State of Nigeria, General Yakubu Gowon by the Hausa-Fulani within the military who were and are the major ethnic group from the North and mostly of Islamic faith.