Linear and Non-Linear Supersymmetry for Non-Hermitian Matrix Hamiltonians

Linear and Non-Linear Supersymmetry for Non-Hermitian Matrix Hamiltonians

Saint-Petersburg State University Physical Faculty Russia, Saint-Petertsburg, 198504, Petrodvorets, Ulianovskaya ul., 1 Andrei V. Sokolov Linear and Non-linear Supersymmetry for Non-Hermitian Matrix Hamiltonians Report at the Workshop \PHHQP XI: Non-Hermitian Operators in Quantum Physics" August 27-31, 2012, APC, Paris, France Main points of the report • Basic definitions and notation • Brief review of the literature and the purpose of this report • A method of constructing of any matrix differential intertwining operator of any order in terms of transformation vector-functions • Theorem on singular factorization of a matrix intertwining operator into a prod- uct of matrix intertwining operators of lower orders • The notion of minimizability of a matrix intertwining operator and criterion of minimizability • Sufficient condition of existence for an intertwining operator a \conjugate" inter- twining operator of the same order and of polynomial SUSY with these operators • Theorem on existence for any intertwining operator a \conjugate" intertwining operator and polynomial SUSY with these operators • Sufficient condition of reducibility of an intertwining operator and existence of absolutely irreducible intertwining operators 2 1 Basic definitions and notation 1.1 Intertwining relation Let us consider two defined on the entire axis matrix n × n Hamiltonians 2 2 H+ = −In@ + V+(x);H− = −In@ + V−(x);@ ≡ d=dx; where In is the identity matrix and V+(x) and V−(x) are square matrices, all ele- ments of which are sufficiently smooth and, in general, complex-valued functions. We suppose that these Hamiltonians are intertwined by a matrix linear differential − operator QN , so that N − − − X − j Q H+ = H−Q ;Q = X (x)@ ; (1) N N N j=0 j − where Xj (x), j = 0, . , N are as well square matrices of n-th order, elements of which are sufficiently smooth and, in general, complex-valued functions. It is not hard to check that intertwining (1) leads to the following consequences: − − − −1 − 0 − −1 XN (x) = Const;V−(x) = XN V+(x)(XN ) + 2XN−1(x)(XN ) ; − where and in the what follows we restrict ourselves by the case det XN 6= 0. 3 1.2 About \conjugate" intertwining operator + Existence of a \conjugate" matrix intertwining operator QM for a given matrix − intertwining operator QN such that M + + + X + j H+Q = Q H−;Q = X (x)@ ; (2) M M m j=0 j is not evident in general but is evident in the following cases: y y + + + − y PN j − y (1) H+ =H+;H− =H− ) H+QN =QN H−;QN =QN = j=0(−@) Xj (x); where y denotes Hermitian conjugation; t t + + + − t PN j − t (2) H+ =H+;H− =H− ) H+QN =QN H−;QN =QN = j=0(−@) Xj (x); where t denotes transposition; ∗ + + + − ∗ PN − ∗ j (3) H+ = H− ) H+QN = QN H−;QN = QN = j=0 Xj (x)@ ; where ∗ denotes complex conjugation. Existence of a \conjugate" matrix intertwining operator of the type (2) for any − matrix intertwining operator QN is guaranteed by one of theorems presented below. 4 1.3 Structure of intertwining operator kernel, transformation functions − By virtue of the intertwining the kernel of QN is an invariant subspace for H+: − − H+ ker QN ⊂ ker QN : − − − − Hence, for any basis Φ1 (x), . , Φd (x) in ker QN , d = dim ker QN = nN there is a + constant square matrix T ≡ kTijk of d-th order such that d − X + − H+Φ = T Φ ; i = 1; : : : ; d: i j=1 ij j − + A basis in the kernel of an intertwining operator QN in which the matrix T has a normal (Jordan) form is called a canonical basis. Elements of a canonical basis are called a transformation vector-functions. If a Jordan form of the matrix T + has block(s) of order higher than one, then the corresponding canonical basis contains not only formal vector-eigenfunctions of H+ but also formal associated vector-function(s) of H+ which are defined as follows. A finite or infinite set of vector-functions Φm;i(x), i = 0, 1, 2, . is called a chain of formal associated vector-functions of H+ for a spectral value λm if H+Φm;0 =λmΦm;0; Φm;0(x)6≡0; (H+−λmIn)Φm;i =Φm;i−1; i=1; 2; 3;:::: 5 2 Brief review of the literature [1] R.D. Amado, F. Cannata, J.-P. Dedonder, Coupled-channel supersymmetric quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 38 (1988) 3797. + − +: the simplest formulae for H+, H−, Q1 and Q1 in the case where N = 1, n is arbitrary, all transformation vector-functions are formal vector-eigenfunctions of H+ and belong to the only its spectral value; −: very partial case. [2] A.A. Andrianov, F.Cannata, D.N.Nishnianidze, M.V.Ioffe, Matrix Hamiltonians: SUSY approach to hidden symmetries, JPA 30 (1997) 5037; quant-ph/9707004. + −† y y +: systematic studying of the system where QN = QN , H+ = H+ and H− = H− in the case N = 1 for n = 2 mostly and in the case N = 2 for n = 2; −: rather restricted case. 6 [3] V.M. Goncharenko, A.P. Veselov, Monodromy of the matrix Schr¨odingerequa- tions and Darboux transformations, JPA 31 (1998) 5315. − − +: there are formulae in [3] that allow us to construct any QN with XN = In and the corresponding H− for any H+ (n and N are arbitrary); −: the formulae of [3] are rather complex since they contain quasideterminants and they are in terms of a basis in an H+-invariant subspace; there is no any − condition that provides implementability of the described procedure of QN con- − structing and absence of pole(s) for QN coefficients and for the potential of H−. [4] B.F. Samsonov, A.A. Pecheritsin, Chains of Darboux transformations for the matrix Schr¨odingerequation, JPA 37 (2004) 239; quant-ph/0307145. − +: there are more simple than in [3] formulae for QN and H− in terms of usual determinants and of formal vector-eigenfunctions of H+; −: very restricted case since only vector-eigenfunctions of H+ are used; there is − no condition that provides implementability of the procedure of QN constructing − and absence of pole(s) for QN and H−. 7 [5] T. Tanaka, N -fold Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanical Matrix Models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012) 1250051; arXiv:1108.0480. +: the author proposes to consider SUSY generated by two intertwining opera- − + + − − + tors of the same order QN and QN such that QN QN and QN QN are the identical polynomials with matrix coefficients of H+ and H− respectively; −: there is no any general method of construction of such SUSY and there is no proof of existence of such SUSY except the case n = N = 2. The purpose of this report is to generalize the results of [6] A.A. Andrianov, A.V. Sokolov, Nonlinear supersymmetry in quantum mechan- ics: algebraic properties and differential representation, Nucl. Phys. B 660 (2003) 25; hep-th/0301062. to the matrix case. 8 3 A method of constructing of any matrix differential intertwining operator of any order in terms of transformation vector-functions Let us consider a set of formal associated vector-functions − − − − t Φl (x) ≡ 'l1(x);'l2(x);:::;'ln(x) ; l = 1; : : : ; nN; n; N 2 N of a matrix n × n Hamiltonian H+ such that this set can be divided into a chains of formal associated vector-functions of H+ for different, in general, spectral values − of H+ and the Wronskian W (x) of all Φl (x), l = 1, . , nN does not vanish on − the real axis. Then a matrix n × n differential operator QN of N-th order with − N arbitrary nondegenerate matrix coefficient XN at @ that intertwines H+ with some Hamiltonian H− and such that the considered set form a basis in its kernel can be 9 uniquely found as follows, 1 Q− = X− N W (x) N '− :::'− '−0 :::'−0 ::: ('− )(N−1) ::: ('− )(N−1) (Φ−)(N) 11 1n 11 1n 11 1n 1 − − −0 −0 − (N−1) − (N−1) − (N) '21 :::'2n '21 :::'2n ::: ('21) ::: ('2n) (Φ2 ) . .. .. .. .. × . ; '− :::'− '−0 :::'−0 ::: ('− )(N−1) ::: ('− )(N−1) (Φ− )(N) nN;1 nN;n nN;1 nN;n nN;1 nN;n nN N−1 N−1 N P1 :::Pn P1@:::Pn@:::P1@ :::Pn@ In@ PlΦ = 'l; 8 Φ(x) ≡ '1(x);'2(x);:::;'n(x) ; l = 1; : : : ; n; where during calculation of the determinant in each of its terms the corresponding N−1 N−1 N of the operators P1,..., Pn, P1@,..., Pn@, P1@ ,..., Pn@ , In@ must be placed on the last position. The potential of the Hamiltonian H− intertwined with − H+ by QN can be calculated with the help of the formula from the section 1. We emphasize that the condition that the Wronskian W (x) does not vanish on the − real axis provides existence for QN and H− and smoothness (absence of pole(s)) for − − − the potential of H− and all matrix-valued coefficients X0 (x), . , XN−1(x) of QN . 10 4 Theorem on singular factorization of a matrix intertwining operator into a product of matrix intertwining operators of lower orders The following theorem takes an important part in studying of polynomial supersym- metry and minnimizability and reducibility of matrix intertwining operators. Theorem 1. Suppose that − − (1) Φl (x), l = 1,..., nN are elements of a canonical basis in ker QN renumbered − so that the set Φl (x); l = 1,..., nj for any j = 1,..., N − 1 can be divided into a chains of formal associated vector-functions of H+; − (2) Wj(x) is the Wronskian of Φl (x), l = 1,..., nj, where j = 1,..., N; (3) jm, m = 1,..., M is monotonically increasing sequence of natural numbers such that jM = N and Wjm (x) 6≡ 0, m = 1,..., M − 1; (4) Nm = jm − jm−1, m = 1,..., M, j0 ≡ 0.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us