Hered 445 Master..Hered 445 .. Page648

Hered 445 Master..Hered 445 .. Page648

Heredity 81 (1998) 648–658 Received 19 March 1998, accepted 15 June 1998 Genetic analysis of the domestication syndrome in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., Poaceae): inheritance of the major characters V. PONCET*%, F. LAMY%, J. ENJALBERT^, H. JOLY§, A. SARR% & T. ROBERT% %Laboratoire d’Evolution et Syst´ematique, Universit´e Paris XI, Bˆat. 362, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France, ^Station de G´en´etique V´eg´etale, Ferme du Moulon, F-91190 Gif sur Yvette, France and §CIRAD-Forˆet, campus international de Baillarguet, BP 5035, F-34032 Montpellier Cedex 1, France The inheritance of domestication traits distinguishing pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) from its wild relatives (P. mollissimum) was assessed in F2 progenies derived from a cross between a typical landrace of pearl millet and a wild ecotype. Despite a high level of recombination between the two genomes, the existence of preferential associations between some characters was demonstrated, leading, in particular, to cultivated-like phenotypes. Traits determining spikelet structure showed simple Mendelian inheritance. Moreover, the genes encoding these traits mapped in a linkage group where quantitative trait loci for spike size and tillering habit were found. This linkage group could correspond to one of the two chromosome segments that have already been shown to be involved in the variation for spikelet structure in progenies from several cultivatedÅwild crosses. A synthetic map of these two regions is given. The evolutionary significance of this genomic organization in relation to the domestication process is discussed, as well as its potential use for pearl millet genetic resources enhancement. Keywords: domestication, genetic map, pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum. Introduction dormancy. Regarding plant architecture and phenol- ogy, drastic changes are evidenced by the tillering Pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum ssp. glaucum (L.) habit (low number of tillers and hierarchy in the R. Br., is one of the principal cereal crops of the flowering of tillers) and spike length (gigantism), semiarid regions of Africa and India. In these areas, both resulting from an increase in apical dominance characterized by low or erratic rainfall, high (e.g. in maize: Doebley et al., 1997). On an evolu- temperature and low soil fertility, pearl millet gives tionary scale, domestication is a recent event that stable grain yields (Gupta, 1995). The wild forms of could have been facilitated by simple Mendelian pearl millet (the P. mollissimum and P. violaceum inheritance of the major characters of the domesti- ecotypes of P. glaucum ssp. monodii) are only found cation syndrome (Ladizinsky, 1985). This has already in Africa, where they have been involved in the been shown in maize (Doebley & Stec, 1993; domestication of the crop for several thousand years Dorweiler et al., 1993), foxtail-millet (Darmency & (Brunken et al., 1977). Domestication has yielded Pern`es, 1986), barley and wheat (Hillman & Davies, genetic modifications of some original traits of the 1990) for the shedding ability. In pearl millet, Joly wild plants. These traits define the domestication (1984) has shown that shedding is controlled by the syndrome (Harlan, 1975). As for many cereals, the presence of a functional abscission layer on the most important transformations in pearl millet, rachis of the wild forms. She demonstrated that both compared with its wild relatives, are the suppression shedding and seed coating have an oligogenic of spikelet shedding, the size reduction of bristles inheritance and that the genes involved are closely and bracts leading to uncoated seed, the increase in linked. This could explain the high frequency of seed size and spikelet pedicel length and the loss of domesticated phenotypes for these traits in back- crosses and F2 progenies between wild and culti- *Correspondence. E-mail: [email protected] vated forms of pearl millet (e.g. Niangado, 1981). 648 ©1998 The Genetical Society of Great Britain. GENETICS OF PEARL MILLET DOMESTICATION 649 Harlan (1971) has suggested that pearl millet collected near Gao in Mali. The cultivated parent, P. domestication was a relatively fast process, repeated glaucum cv. Souna (5338(1)), is an early-flowering independently in several places in a so-called landrace from Mali, where sympatry with wild forms ‘noncentre’. This assumption is consistent with the still occurs. The cultivated plant was used as the regional rather than phenotypical (cultivated vs. wild female parent. The F2 population (364–87) was type) observed structuring of the isozyme genetic obtained from a single F1 plant (272–86(1)). The diversity in West Africa (Pern`es, 1985; Tostain & wild and cultivated progenitors were also self-polli- Marchais, 1989). Furthermore, pearl millet shows a nated. All these crosses were carried out at Gif sur wide variation for spike length, shape and weight, Yvette, and an F2 population of 250 plants was grain colour and plant architecture (Brunken et al., sown. Plants were grown at a 16-h photoperiod for 1977; Ouendeba et al., 1995). The wild relatives of the first 6 weeks and a 12-h photoperiod during the pearl millet are still found in sympatry with the culti- subsequent 3 weeks to induce flowering with a vated form in some areas of the Sahelian regions of temperature of 28°C during the day and 24°C at Africa. Both P. glaucum and P. mollissimum are night. The plants were then randomly planted in a diploid (2n = 2x = 14), mainly cross-pollinated, fully greenhouse with a spacing of 70 cm between plants. interfertile and have the same genome size (Martel et al., 1997). They therefore belong to the same primary gene pool (Harlan, 1975). Despite the Variables occurrence of gene flow, as witnessed by inter- Table 1 lists the morphological traits analysed. mediate phenotypes in traditional fields (Marchais, Robert & Sarr (1992) reported that spike and spike- 1994), the main phenotypical differences are main- let morphology and plant architecture highly tained. Although pollen competition has been shown discriminate these cultivated and wild phenotypes. to play a role, it could not explain this situation fully Flowering characteristics were also scored. The (Robert et al., 1992). Unravelling the inheritance of protogyny index, PI, evaluates the potential inci- the main characters distinguishing wild and culti- dence of self-pollen on receptive stigmas: when vated forms of pearl millet appears to be a funda- PIa1, all the stigmas of the inflorescence emerge mental topic for understanding the dynamics of the before anthesis; when PIR1, self-pollen as well as domestication process. cross-pollen can be present at the same time (Joly & This peculiar situation in the pearl millet gene Sarr, 1985). pool offers a remarkable framework for addressing evolutionary questions about the number of genes involved in the domestication process and their The carboxylic esterase E gene (EC 3.1.1.1) genomic organization. The above-mentioned studies Linkage between the esterase E locus and a locus have partially documented this topic. The two main involved in the expression of the length of the objectives of this study are, first, to give a synthetic pedicel (PL) has been detected previously by Pern`es view of the inheritance of characters involved in the (1986). Therefore, the Est-E gene was studied, as domestication syndrome at the spikelet level based described by Sandmeier et al. (1981). The b-esterase on crosses involving morphologically differentiated E has a dimeric structure coded by a Mendelian cultivated forms and, secondly, to unravel the gene with seven alleles scored in pearl millet. general inheritance trend for millet plant architec- ture traits. The genomic organization underlying the domestication syndrome at these two levels will be Statistical procedures inferred using an F population derived from a cross 2 Mendelian segregation and linkage analysis Vari- between a landrace of pearl millet and a wild ables with an obvious bimodal distribution in the F relative. 2 were transformed into discrete variables using the incomplete moment method (Pearson, 1915). Materials and methods Mendelian segregation (mono- or digenic models) was tested using a chi-squared test. Independence Plant material between traits was tested with a chi-squared test. An F2 population derived from a cultivatedÅwild The recombination rates were estimated by the hybrid was studied. The wild parent, P. mollissimum maximum likelihood method (Allard, 1956). (187–80(4)), referred to as ‘Molli’ in the paper, is an Our data concerning these Mendelian traits were S4 line generated from a natural wild population compared with previously published results (Joly, © The Genetical Society of Great Britain, Heredity, 81, 648–658. 650 V. PONCET ET AL. 1984) in order to build a tentative consensus map of of the Mahalanobis distances. This discriminant these characters in pearl millet. analysis was first computed for the whole F2 popula- tion, including both parents and F1 individuals as additional passive elements. Then, the phenotypic Phenotypical assessment of the F2 progenies A multi- variate analysis was carried out with all the quantita- similarity between progenies and parents was tive variables following the methodology described studied through a discriminant analysis including the in Sarr & Pern`es (1988). A principal components wild and cultivated parents as a priori groups. analysis was performed on the initial variables to generate fewer independent synthetic ones. Then, a Detection of quantitative trait

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us