Biodiversity and Habitat Characteristics of Intertidal and Estuarine Mudflats of the Fleurieu Peninsula and Gulf St

Biodiversity and Habitat Characteristics of Intertidal and Estuarine Mudflats of the Fleurieu Peninsula and Gulf St

Biodiversity and habitat characteristics of intertidal and estuarine mudflats of the Fleurieu Peninsula and Gulf St. Vincent Report for the DEH and AMLNRM Sabine Dittmann Flinders University, School of Biological Sciences 29. Aug 2008 Contents 1. Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Material and Methods ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Study sites and sampling design ................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Sampling methods and sample analysis ....................................................................................... 7 3.3 Data analysis ................................................................................................................................. 9 4. Results ........................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Environmental conditions ............................................................................................................ 10 4.1.1 Water quality ......................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.2 Sediment characteristics ...................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Benthic diversity, abundances and communities ........................................................................ 17 4.2.1 Fleurieu Peninsula ................................................................................................................ 17 4.2.1.1 Diversity .......................................................................................................................... 17 4.2.1.2 Abundances .................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.1.3 Communities ................................................................................................................... 24 4.2.2 Gulf St Vincent ...................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2.1 Diversity .......................................................................................................................... 26 4.2.2.2 Abundance ...................................................................................................................... 30 4.2.2.3 Communities ................................................................................................................... 38 4.2.3 Comparison of mudflat communities between the Fleurieu peninsula and Gulf St. Vincent .............................................................................................................. 44 4.2.3.1 Diversity .......................................................................................................................... 44 4.2.3.2 Abundances .................................................................................................................... 45 4.2.3.3 Communities ................................................................................................................... 46 4.3 Biomass ....................................................................................................................................... 47 5. Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 48 6. References .................................................................................................................................... 50 i 1. Executive summary • The objectives of this investigation were to assess the biodiversity of benthic macrofauna in intertidal soft sediments of estuaries and mudflats of the Fleurieu Peninsula and Gulf St. Vincent in conjunction with characterising the habitats at the respective sampling sites. Four estuaries and five tidal flats were selected for this study. This was the first comprehensive survey of intertidal soft-sediment biodiversity in this region and will provide a baseline for future studies and monitoring. • Sampling was carried out in the summer of 2006/07, with additional sampling in the estuaries of the Fleurieu Peninsula and on Section Bank in spring 2007. This was necessary as, apart from the Onkaparinga, estuaries were closed during the dry summer; however the winter rainfall had not been sufficient for the rivers to breach the barriers to the adjacent sea. A stratified random sampling design was chosen to investigate the benthic assemblages associated to specific sediment types or biogenic structures. In total, 160 benthic samples were taken. Several parameters for water quality and sediment characteristics were measured and analysed to characterise the habitats. • Salinities ranged from brackish in some of the estuaries to values above marine salinities in some of the mudflats. Oxygen concentrations and saturation were lower in the estuaries than the exposed mudflats. Ammonium and phosphate concentrations in the water exceeded the ANZECC values for stressors in almost all cases. Sediments were mainly fine to medium sands, with variable contents of organic matter and low microphytobenthic biomass. • In total, 93 morphospecies were differentiated at the studied sites, but diversity was significantly higher in the tidal flats of the Gulf St. Vincent than in the estuaries of the Fleurieu Peninsula. Polychaetes and molluscs were richest in species, and several insect larvae were found in the estuaries. The highest species diversity index was recorded for Section Bank, which also had the highest species richness together with Coobowie. • Abundances varied greatly between sites, from almost no macrofauna found in the Inman River estuary in September 2007 to 17618 individuals m-2 recorded at Coobowie. The estuary of the Hindmarsh River as well as the mudflats at Port Gawler and Coobowie had the highest abundances, partly due to the occurrence of mussel beds at the latter two sites. Capitellid polychaetes, chironomid insect larvae, amphipods and the micromollusc Arthritica helmsi accounted for differences in abundances of the estuaries. Larger polychaete specimens of the family Nereididae and the large bivalve Soletellina alba were found at the Hindmarsh estuary. The mudflats around the Gulf St.Vincent were much more particular in their species composition, especially for the polychaetes, and a greater range of taxa was recorded (Nemertinea, Sipunculida, endobenthic anthozoa and holothurids). There were inconsistent patterns of species diversity and individual densities found at the sites, as some sites characterised by higher diversity were poor in abundances. 1 • Multivariate community analyses showed no significantly different assemblages at the estuaries around the Fleurieu Peninsula, whereas the mudflats around the Gulf St. Vincent were quite distinct. The occurrence of mussel beds caused a higher similarity of benthic communities between Port Gawler and Coobowie, and Section Bank was also very distinct to the other sites. Characteristic species for the five mudflat sites are detailed in this report. Analysed across all 11 sites, significant differences emerged in benthic communities of the estuaries and open mudflats of the Gulf St Vincent. Insect larvae, several polychaete families, and the snail Salinator fragilis contributed to these differences. • Benthic biomass was determined only for the sites sampled in spring 2007. The biomass at Section Bank was 16 x higher than at the estuaries, which had partly negligible amounts of biomass. • This study revealed idiosyncrasies of tidal flat communities on a regional scale, which has implications for the design of a comprehensive and representative network of reserves. Within site heterogeneity also implies the need to protect extensive areas of tidal flats. 2 2. Introduction Marine sediments constitute the largest habitat on Earth with an as yet unknown diversity of organisms (Snelgrove 1998). Nearshore soft sediments have been more intensively studied than the deep sea and revealed important links between benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functions (Snelgrove et al. 1997; Hall et al. 2000; Raffaelli et al. 2003). In estuaries and tidal flats in particular, benthos contributes to biogeochemical exchange processes in such critical transition zones (Levin et al. 2001). An understanding of species and functional diversity in coastal sedimentary environments is therefore crucial to evaluate linkages between catchments and coastal seas. Furthermore, assessing benthic communities is an important step for the protection of coastal wetlands and planning of Marine Parks (Banks & Skilleter 2002, Roff et al. 2003, Stevens & Connolly 2004). This is specifically relevant in an area like the Gulf St. Vincent where wetlands are subject to a range of environmental pressures (Edyvane 1999). Intertidal habitats around the Gulf St. Vincent comprise rocky shores, beaches and tidal flats, which have a unique flora and fauna each (Benkendorff et al. 2008). The estuaries around the Fleurieu Peninsula and Gulf St. Vincent are river-, wave-

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    56 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us