1 Thomas Precession

1 Thomas Precession

Physics 139 Relativity Thomas Precession February 1998 G. F. SMOOT DepartmentofPhysics, University of California, Berkeley, USA 94720 1 Thomas Precession Thomas Precession is a kinematic e ect discovered by L. T. Thomas in 1926 L. T. Thomas Phil. Mag. 3, 1 1927. It is fairly subtle and mathematically sophisticated but it has great imp ortance in atomic physics in connection with spin- orbit interaction. Without including Thomas Precession, the rate of spin precession of an atomic electron is o by a factor of 2. Later we will see that there is a similar e ect for gravitational elds. The e ect is connected with the fact that two successive Lorentz transformations in di erent directions are equivalent to a Lorentz transformation plus a three dimensional rotation. This rotation of the lo cal frame of rest is the kinematic e ect that causes the Thomas precession. For the lecture we will not do the full mathematical treatment, since it is rather involved. Instead we will showby a simple example how the rotation and thus precession comes ab out. Maketwo successive Lorentz transformations in orthogonal directions: from S 0 0 00 to S with velo city v along the x axis, followed by a transformation from S to S with 0 0 velo city v along the y axis, as shown by the following diagram. 00 y 6 00 S > 00 00 O 0 0 - x > 0 6 y v 6 0 6 y 0 - - - 0 x x O O 0 v S S 00 00 The line from the origin O of S to the origin O of S making and angle in 00 00 S and an angle in S .We can calculate the angles in the two frames by applying 1 the Lorentz transformations and evaluating them in each frame. 0 0 0 x = x vt x = x + vt 0 2 0 0 2 t = t v x=c t = t + vx =c 0 0 y = y y = y 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 y = y v t y = y + vt 00 0 0 00 x = x x = x where q q 0 2 2 0 2 =1= 1v =c =1= 1v=c Combing these equations one nds: 00 0 0 y = [y v x vt] 00 x = x vt 2 Nowwe can calculate the angle made by the line b etween origins. For a Galilean transform one would have 0 0 y v t v tan = = = 3 x vt v but Sp ecial Relativity shows us that 3-D velo cities do not transform like 3-D vectors. So wemust calculate carefully. 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 00 y y + v t v t y 00 = = j = 4 tan = y =0 x vt vt vt 0 0 2 0 00 0 00 2 0 00 00 0 00 t = t + vx =c j = t + v y =c j = t 5 x =x =0 y =0 so that 0 0 00 0 v t v tan = = 6 0 00 v t v Note that this answer is very near the Galilean result but with the factor of 1/ which reminds us of ab erration. 00 Nowwe calculate : 0 0 0 0 00 [y v t ] y 00 = 7 tan = 00 0 x x 00 00 00 where x and y are the co ordinates of the origin O of system S in the S system. Thus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [y v ] v t v t v t 00 tan = j = = j = 8 y =0 x=0 0 0 x x x vt vt 0 2 t = t v x=c j = t; 9 x=0 0 0 v 00 tan = 10 v 2 0 This lo oks again similar to the Galilean angle except for the extra factor of . Now consider a particle on a curved path C C C y C C C C C C C CW X X ? x 6 v At a certain time it is at the origin O of our system S. Put the x axis parallel 0 to the path, and y axis toward the center of curvature. At t = 0, the rest frame S is 00 moving in the x direction with velo city v .At a slightly later time its rest frame S is 0 0 moving p erp endicular to x in the y direction with velo city v = v. De ne ! ! 0 0 0 v v 00 1 1 = = tan tan 11 v v For a very short time interval the motion is circular. That is t the lo cal curve with a tangent circle with appropriate radius of curvature. v = ! Rcos v = ! Rsin x y 12 0 v = v v = v = v x y so 0 v tan = v ! tan 00 1 0 1 13 = = tan tan tan Cho ose to b e very small; S vt = = R R Then ! vt 1 0 14 R ! v 1 0 ! = T t R In a circle the acceleration is 2 v v a a = so that = R R v 3 giving ! a 1 0 ! = T v Supp ose we are in a non-relativistic region v<<c, like an electron in an atom: q 0 1 1 1 v 1 v 1 v 0 2 2 2 2 q = 1 v=c 1+ 1+ 0 2 2 c 2 c 2 c 1 v =c 0 since tan = v =v << 1. Putting this backinto the expression for ! T 2 a v va ! = T 2 2 v 2c 2c 00 Thus > ,thus a counter-clo ckwise rotation, implying ~v ~a ~! = 15 T 2 2c The rigorous result is 2 ~v~a ~! = 16 T 2 +1 2c 2 Spin-Orbit Interaction of Electron with Nucleus in an Atom Nowwe are set to apply this kinematic e ect to spin precession in an atom. In its own rest frame the electron \sees" the nucleus ying by. ~ The electron's magnetic moment, ~, and spin angular momentum, S , are related by e ~ mu~ = S 17 m c c The torque on the magnetic momentis ~ dS 0 ~ 18 = ~ B ~ = dt 0 ~ where B is the magnetic eld in the e frame. ! ~v e 0 ~ ~ ~ B B = E 19 c ~ ~ Where B is the magnetic eld and E is the electric eld in the nucleus rest frame. v=c << 1 so that 1, ! ~ ~v dS e ~ ~ B 20 = ~ E dt c 4 arises from the interaction energy ! ~v e 0 ~ ~ U = ~ B E 21 c ~ If E is due to a spherically symmetrical charge distribution { as for a one- electron atom or one outside a closed shell { then dV ~r ~ ~ eE = rV r : 22 r dr Then ! dV e e ~r 0 ~ ~ ~ U = S B + S ~v 23 2 m c m c r dr e e ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~v r =+Sf~v e e 1 dV 0 ~ ~ ~ U = SB+ S~r~v 2 2 m c m c r dr e e e e 1 dV ~ ~ ~ ~ = S B + S L 24 2 m c m c r dr e e ~ since m~r ~v = L angular momentum. This second term is the spin-orbit interaction. Now, if the electron rest frame is rotating { Thomas angular velo city ~! , 0 ~ ~ dS =dt 6= ~ B . The general kinematic result from classical physics is: @ @ j = j ~! 25 rotation co ordinates inertial co ordinates @t @t as an op erator on any vector. So ~ ~ @ S @ S ~ j = j ~! S 26 rotation co ordinates inertial co ordinates @t @t With this expression the interation energy is changed to: 0 ~ U = U S ~! 27 T where ~! is prop ortional to the centrip etal acceleration due to E . T r 0 1 ~ eE 1 1 @ A ~v ~a = ~v ~! T 2 2 2c 2c m e ! 1 ~r dV = ~v 2 2mc r dr 5 ~ dV 1 dV 1 1 L = ~r ~v = 28 2 2 2 2m c r dr 2m c r dr e e Thus dV 1 1 0 ~ ~ U = U S L 2 2 2m c r dr e e dV 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ = S B +1 S L 29 2 2 m c 2 m c r dr e e The -1/2 is the famous one half. Including it, the observed ne-structure spacings in atomic sp ectra, due to electron spin, are correctly predicted. This schematic gives a heuristic indication of how the torque arises. ~ E 6 +q s ~ ` -q The force on eachcharge p ositive and negative is F = qE . The magnetic momentis =g`. The net torque is = q E `sin = E sin The energy relativeto = is ` ~ cos = ~ E E = 2qE 2 6 3 A Simple Derivation of the Thomas Precession The follwoing derivation is based up on a suggestion by E.M. Purcell. Imagine an aricraft ying in a large circular orbit. Approximate the orbit bya p olygon of N sides, with N avery large numb er. As the aircraft traverses eachofthe N sides, it changes its angle of ightby the angle =2=N as shown in the gure. BM Z} Z B Z W B Z BM B B B B side of L B polygon B B B B B B 6 After the aircraft has own N segments, it is back at its starting p oint. IN the lab oratory frame, the aircraft has rotated through an angle of 2 radians. However in the aircraft's instantaneous rest frame, the triangles shown have a Lorentz-contraction along the direction it is ying but not transversely.Thus at the end of each segment, in the aircraft frame, the aircraft turns by a larger angle than the lab oratory =2=N , 0 but by an angle = = W=L= =2 =N .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us