Forestry Commission Bulletin: Agroforestry in the UK

Forestry Commission Bulletin: Agroforestry in the UK

Forestry Commission Bulletin 122 estry in the UK Edited by Max Hislop and Jenny Claridge Forestry Commission ARCHIVE FORESTRY COMMISSION BULLETIN 122 Agroforestry in the UK Edited by Max Hislop and Jenny Claridge Silviculture (North) Branch, Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY Edinburgh: Forestry Commission © Crown copyright 2000 First published 2000 Applications for reproduction should be made to HMSO, The Copyright Unit, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ ISBN 0 85538 414 X Hislop, A. Maxwell; Claridge, Jennifer N. 2000. Agroforestry in the UK. Bulletin 122. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, xii + 136 pp. FDC 26:268.1: (410) KEYWORDS: Agroforestry, Arable crops, Environment, Farm management, Grazing, Landscape, Pigs, Poultry, Sheep, Silvoarable systems, Silvopastoral systems The editors and authors of chapters in this Bulletin should be cited as: Auclair, D. Claridge, J.N. Hooker, J.E. Sibbald, A.R. Beaton, A. Dorward, P. Incoll, L.D. Sinclair, F.L. Bell, S. Doyle, C.J. McAdam, J.H. Thomas, T.H. Brownlow, M.J.C. Eason, W.R. Newman, S.M. Willis, R.W. Camithers, P. Hislop, A.M. Sheldrick, R.D. Acknowledgements The editors’ thanks are due to all the authors whose contributions have made this publication possible and for their patience throughout the refereeing process. Thanks are also due to David Corry (Leeds University), Peter Dennis (MLURI), Richard Crowe (Greenmount College) for their helpful comments on chapters at an early draft stage. In addition, many of the authors provided useful suggestions to other authors’ chapters. Many project leaders, scientists, research workers and research students past and present have contributed to the experiments referred to in this publication and have given permission for their results to be used. James Simpson initiated the publication and thanks are due to him for the original concept and for approaching the authors for their contributions. Numerous helpful comments have been made by Bill Mason, Paul Tabbush and Jim Dewar. Finally, we are grateful to the Forest Research typists for typing various drafts, and to the staff in Communications Branch for their help with photographs, illustrations, editorial advice and references. Front cover: Upland silvopastoral Enquiries relating to this publication system with larch and sheep at Radnor, should be addressed to: Wales. (FOREST RESEARCH PHOTO LIBRARY 51404) The Research Communications Officer, Forest Research Back cover: top Lowland silvoarable Alice Holt Lodge system with poplar and winter wheat at Wrecclesham Bramham, West Yorkshire, ( l y n t o n i n c o l l , Famham u n i v e r s i t y o f l e e d s ) bottom Pigs at pannage Surrey GU10 4LH in Denny Wood, New Forest, Hampshire, ( t e r r y h e a t i i c o t e ) Contents Page Acknowledgements ii List of plates v List of figures vi Summary viii Resume ix Zusammenfassung x Crynodeb xi List of contributors xii Section One: Background 1 1 Introduction 3 Aims of the Bulletin 3 What is agroforestry? 3 Why choose agroforestry? 4 The future of agroforestry in the UK 5 2 Origins o f agroforestry and recent history in the UK 7 Introduction: origins and principles 7 Recent developments in the UK 10 The future 12 3 Understanding and management of interactions 17 Introduction 17 Complexity inherent in managing interactions 17 The need to understand interactions 19 Types of interactions 20 Resource capture 20 Biodiversity 21 Succession 21 Scale 22 Managing interactions to meet objectives 23 Section TVvo: Best Practice and Current Research 29 4 Trees in agroforestry systems 31 Introduction 31 Species choice for agroforestry systems 31 Establishment 33 Protection 38 Formative pruning 40 5 Grazing livestock management 44 Introduction 44 Sward establishment 44 Grassland management 46 Grazing systems 51 Conclusions 55 6 Alternatives to grazing livestock 58 Introduction 58 Current practice in the UK 58 Key considerations in design and management 59 Recommended practices: pigs 65 Recommended practices: chickens and turkeys 67 Recommended practices: ducks and geese 69 Conclusions 69 7 Arable crops in agroforestry systems 71 Introduction 71 Design of temperate silvoarable systems 71 Special requirements for management 73 Early silvoarable research 73 Recent silvoarable research 74 Conclusions and current recommendations 78 Section Three: Environmental and Landscape Impacts 81 8 Environmental impacts 83 Introduction 83 Wildlife and biodiversity in silvoarable systems 83 Wildlife and biodiversity in silvopastoral systems 84 The physical environment 88 Conclusions 88 9 Agroforestry in the landscape 91 Introduction 91 Characteristics of agroforestry in the landscape 91 Design of silvopastoral systems 92 Design of silvoarable systems 94 Species choice 94 Other means of achieving variety 96 Practicalities and costs of design 96 Section Four: Social and Economic Impacts 97 10 The social implications of agroforestry 99 Social and economic context 99 Farmer attitudes to forestry and agroforestry 99 Wider employment impacts of agroforestry 101 Non-market benefits 103 Pointers to the future 103 11 The economics of agroforestry in the UK 107 Background 107 Agroforestry technology 107 Current UK support arrangements for agroforestry 107 Evaluating the economics of agroforestry 108 Appendix 1 120 Appendix 2 123 Glossary 126 Abbreviations 127 iv List of plates Plates 1-26 between pages 28 and 29. 1 Radiata pine planted on steep slopes as an erosion prevention measure on a farm in New Zealand, (a) Sheep grazing in a young silvopasture; (b) a more mature silvopasture being rested from grazing. 2 Lowland silvoarable system with poplar and winter wheat at Bramham, West Yorkshire. 3 Upland silvopastoral system with sheep and 19-year-old larch at Radnor, Wales. 4 Adult fighting bulls grazing on a Spanish dehesa with holm oaks. 5 Single row of white pine acting as a windbreak on a prairie farm in Nebraska, USA. 6 Alley cropping in Cameroon: Leucaena hedge (at right) about to be cut and nutrient-rich foliage placed between maize. 7 Experiment at Glentress, Peebleshire to assess sward growth under different densities of cover, (a) Sward boxes under tall trees at medium spacing, (b) Different spacing arrangements. 8 Tree pruning in a lowland silvopastoral system with sheep and ash at Loughall, Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland. 9 Unrooted hybrid poplar set 1.5 m long and cylindrical steel bar. 10 Laying black plastic mulch strip prior to inserting a row of poplar cuttings. 11 Line of first-year poplar planted as unrooted sets through plastic mulch using a tractor-mounted spike. 12 A newly planted tree in a silvopastoral system protected from grazing sheep by a treeshelter with one robust stake and a short secondary stake to prevent turning. 13 (a) and (b) Red alder planted at the Henfaes, Bangor NNE site (400 trees ha-1) protected against sheep by an individual fence and against rabbits by a spiral guard. 14 (a) and (b) Sycamore at the Glensaugh NNE site 8 years after planting (400 trees ha1) protected against sheep by 1.8 m plastic mesh. 15 Sheep grazing in a deciduous silvopastoral system with sycamore at Loughgall, Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland. 16 Exclusion cages to monitor sward growth, (a) In a 400 tree ha1 sycamore plot at Glensaugh, Grampian, Scotland, (b) In a mature poplar silvopasture, Ballywalters, Co. Down, Northern Ireland. 17 Tractor application of fertiliser to encourage good pasture growth, ash silvopasture, Loughgall, Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland. 18 Pigs at pannage in Denny Wood, New Forest, Hampshire. v 19 Free-range turkeys in a commercial forest enterprise in northern England. 20 Shade from 4-year-old poplar over a germinating spring crop at Old Wolverton, Buckinghamshire. 21 Thinning of 4-year-old, 1 m spaced poplar trees at Old Wolverton, Buckinghamshire. 22 Harvesting of winter wheat in a silvoarable trial at Silsoe, Bedfordshire. 23 Build up of weeds at the edges of mulch strip, and in areas of strip damaged by wild animals, at Old Wolverton, Buckinghamshire. 24 Side pruning of poplar in a silvoarable trial at Silsoe, Bedfordshire. 25 (a) The carabid beetle (Pterostichus niger), commonly found in silvopasture on lowland sites in Northern Ireland, (b) The fieldfare ( Turdus pilaris), attracted to silvopasture in upland and sites across the UK. 26 Necessarily regular layout of experimental site at Bronydd Mawr (NNE site) resulting in poor landscape impact. List of figures 2.1 Origins of the Agroforestry Research Discussion Forum 1984-1986 2.2 The National Network Experiment sites 3.1 Decline of pasture productivity over time for upland silvopastoral rotations with and without tree pruning 3.2 Different tree pruning strategies 3.3 Empiral relationships between crown length and relative pasture yield for Pinus radiata in NZ 3.4 The response-effect principle 3.5 Ash tree root length at different soil depths 3.6 Different tree arrangements that cover one-quarter of a field 4.1 Planting techniques for unrooted poplar sets 4.2 Formative pruning 4.3 Time to prune 5.1 Annual profile of sward height recommended for a lowland sheep system 5.2 Model prediction of tree cover 5.3 Model prediction of pasture production vi 6.1 Fertiliser content of fresh chicken, turkey and domestic pig manures under several representative management regimes 7.1 A year in the life of a temperate silvoarable system: winter wheat and deciduous trees 7.2 The distribution of yield of winter wheat in 1.5 m strips across a 12 m alley 7.3 Effect of distance from a row of trees on yield of winter barley

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    152 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us