Volatiles Emitted by Resistance Inducer-Treated Grapevines Affect Hyalesthes Obsoletus Behavioural Responses

Volatiles Emitted by Resistance Inducer-Treated Grapevines Affect Hyalesthes Obsoletus Behavioural Responses

Bulletin of Insectology 73 (1): 117-123, 2020 ISSN 1721-8861 eISSN 2283-0332 Volatiles emitted by resistance inducer-treated grapevines affect Hyalesthes obsoletus behavioural responses Roxana L. MINUZ, Valeria MANCINI, Sara RUSCHIONI, Massimo MOZZON, Roberta FOLIGNI, Nunzio ISIDORO, Gianfranco ROMANAZZI, Paola RIOLO Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy Abstract The planthopper Hyalesthes obsoletus Signoret (Hemiptera Cixiidae) is the main vector of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’, that cause the grapevine Bois noir disease. Amongst the alternatives to synthetic pesticides, many studies have investigated the use of resistance inducers to control plant pathogens and phytophagous insects. In this study, the planthopper behavioural responses to volatiles emitted by grapevine shoots treated with three commercial chemical elicitors were investigated in a dual-choice olfac- tometer. Each formulation was applied at one of three different times, as 0, 2, and 7 days before the bioassays. Insect behavioural responses toward grapevine volatiles differed significantly across formulations and application times. In particular, H. obsoletus were significantly (χ2 = 7.258, df = 1, P = 0.005) repelled by volatiles emitted by grapevines sprayed with a benzothiadiazole- based formulation 7 days before the bioassays. The two other formulations were based on oligosaccharides and glutathione and gave contrasting results. The planthoppers were significantly (χ2 = 3.571, df =1, P = 0.044) attracted to volatiles emitted by grape- vines treated with one of these formulations on the same day of bioassays, but not subsequently. This suggested a response to the product rather than an elicited response from the plants, so we conducted headspace analysis on samples of the three products to identify differences in volatile constituents for future experimentation. The remaining formulation had no effect at any of the post- treatment intervals. Our results indicate that the benzothiadiazole-based formulation may contribute to a novel sustainable inte- grated management strategy for the control of H. obsoletus, the main vector of the Bois noir phytoplasma. Key words: phytoplasma vector, Bois noir, elicitors, Y-olfactometer, integrated pest management. Introduction of synthetic insecticides and herbicides have been sug- gested for the management of this disease, through the Bois noir (BN) is a grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) disease control of the insect vectors on the wild vegetation with- that can represent a limiting factor for grapevine pro- in the vineyard or on the vineyard borders (Maixner, duction in Europe and the Middle East (Maixner, 2011; 2010; Mori et al., 2015), or through the control of alter- Zahavi et al., 2013). It is associated to the pathogen native host plants. However, the life history of H. obso- ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ (16SrXII-A subgroup) letus, its relationship to wild host plants, and its casual (Quaglino et al., 2013). Characteristic symptoms of this feeding behaviour on grapevines impede the efficient disease include chlorosis and downward rolling of control of this vector (Maixner, 2010). In addition, leaves, stunting of the shoots, and shriveling of berries widespread pesticide applications can have severe im- (Belli et al., 2010). pacts on non-target invertebrates (Gill and Garg, 2014). The main vector of ‘Ca. Phytoplasma solani’ is Hy- Alternative and sustainable integrated pest management alesthes obsoletus Signoret (Hemiptera Cixiidae), a strategies are thus strongly needed. phloem-feeding planthopper present in southern and Among the alternatives to synthetic pesticides, many central European vineyards (Maixner et al., 1994; Sfor- studies have investigated the use of plant resistance in- za and Boudon-Padieu, 1998). Nymphal stages are ducers to control plant pathogens and phytophagous in- linked to the root systems of their host plants where they sects (Vallad and Goodman, 2004). One approach in- feed and overwinter (Sforza et al., 1999). Planthopper volves chemical analogs (elicitors) to plant signals that adults are the aerial stage involved in phytoplasma are applied directly to the plant tissues. Elicitors include transmission through their feeding activity (Bressan et chemicals that mimic the actions of salicylic acid (e.g., al., 2007). H. obsoletus males show greater flight activi- benzothiadiazole), and compounds that can be released ty than females, suggesting that they play a key role in from plant or microbial cell walls (e.g., oligosaccha- the diffusion of the phytoplasma (Bressan et al., 2007; rides, glutathione) (Wingate et al., 1988; Hadwiger, Mazzoni et al., 2010; Minuz et al., 2013). This 1999; Mou et al., 2003; Lyon, 2014). Systemic acquired planthopper feeds on many different wild and cultivated resistance is a well-known mechanism of induced plant plants that can also host the phytoplasma (Sharon et al., defence. In most of the cases, systemic acquired re- 2005; Riolo et al., 2007; 2012; Murolo et al., 2010; sistance is associated with an increase in the activity of Landi et al., 2013; Kosovac et al., 2015; Landi et al., the salicylic acid pathway that plays a role in the ex- 2015) and act as reservoirs for the disease. pression of genes that code for pathogenesis-related pro- For BN, the application of roguing to symptomatic teins (Pieterse et al., 2014, Landi et al., 2017). plants does not contribute to any reduction in its epide- Induced responses cause phenotypic plasticity that can miology, because the infected grapevines are seldom if affect the three-way interactions between plants, her- ever a source of infection (Osler et al., 1993). The use bivorous insects and pathogens (Dicke and Hilker, 2003). However, the literature contains contradictory ingredients; Agrisystem, Italy [GO2]). Each formulation data on the effects of chemical elicitors on herbivorous was diluted with deionized water at the highest regis- insects. In the majority of case, the salicylic acid path- tered rates (0.2 g/L for Bion®, 4 mL/L for Kendal® and way associated with systemic acquired resistance has Olivis®), according to the manufacturer instructions. shown only minimal effects on herbivorous insects, alt- These were used at 1,000 L/ha for application as foliar hough detrimental effects (e.g., on survival, develop- treatments to the canopy of the grapevine plants to run- ment, reproduction, feeding) after elicitor applications off, using a motorized pump backpack liquid sprayer have been reported also for some phloem-feeding in- (GX 25; Honda, Tokyo, Japan) (Romanazzi et al., sects such as leafhoppers, aphids, and whiteflies (Bi et 2013). al., 1997; Inbar et al., 2001; Moran and Thompson, Each diluted formulation (i.e., Bion®, Kendal® and 2001; Cooper et al., 2004; Bressan and Purcell, 2005; Olivis®) was applied at one of three different times, as Boughton et al., 2006; Civolani et al., 2010). Further- 0, 2, and 7 days before the bioassays, for a total of nine more, elicitor applications can reduce leafhopper phyto- treatments (n = 4 plants for each treatment). Control plasma transmission (Bressan and Purcell, 2005; Mil- plants were sprayed with deionized water (1,000 L/ha) iordos et al., 2017). up to the point of the run-off, at the same treatment In addition to increase the direct plant defences, elici- dates (n = 12 plants). tor applications may also affect the emission of plant Terminal shoots (approximately 30 cm long with three volatile compounds (Dicke and Hilker, 2003; Sobhy et leaves) were tested immediately after being collected al., 2014). Volatiles provide important cues for insect from the control and treated grapevine plants. The cut ‘evaluation’ of their host plants (e.g., differentiation be- stems were wrapped in cotton-wool soaked with dis- tween host and non-host plants, indicator of host-plant tilled water, putted into a 6-mL vial and sealed with status) (Gripenberg et al., 2010; Bruce and Pickett, Teflon tape. 2011; Riolo et al., 2012; Ruschioni et al., 2015; Gross, 2016; Germinara et al., 2017; Riolo et al., 2017). Y-tube olfactometer bioassays Romanazzi et al. (2013) evaluated the activities of The responses of planthoppers to volatiles emitted by some elicitors for the induction of recovery of BN- the shoots treated with water (control) and the chemical infected grapevines, and they reported encouraging data elicitors (Bion®, Kendal® and Olivis®) were studied in for the use of benzothiadiazole and two different formu- a glass Y-tube (stem length, 25 cm; arm length, 20 cm; lations that contained glutathione plus oligosaccharides. arm angle, 75°; internal diameter, 4 cm). Each arm of the Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse Y-tube was connected to a glass chamber (9 × 18 cm). the behavioural responses of H. obsoletus males to vola- Control and treated shoots were then placed in one of the tiles emitted by grapevine that had been treated with a holding chambers. The airflow (flow rate 1.0 L/min−1) commercial formulation containing benzothiadiazole or passed through activated charcoal and distilled water with one of two distinct formulations containing oligo- before entering the holding chambers and the arms. The saccharides plus glutathione. Y-tube was positioned with a slope of 10° from the hor- izontal plane. One insect at a time was observed until it had moved 13 cm up one of the olfactometer arms, or Materials and methods for a total of 5 minutes. The treatments were randomly assigned at the begin-

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us