Ew Test and Evaluation - Assuring Survivability and Operational Effectiveness

Ew Test and Evaluation - Assuring Survivability and Operational Effectiveness

EW TEST AND EVALUATION - ASSURING SURVIVABILITY AND OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Dr. Mike Pywell - EW Technologist & Project/Engineering Manager – Typhoon EW Rig Support Equipment Mitch Midgley-Davies – Technical Lead - Typhoon Avionics Sensors Future Capability (Radar/EW) Electromagnetic Engineering Department BAE SYSTEMS, Military Air & Information © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 1 Introduction Contents • Survival – man-made and unintentional threats • EW importance to survivability, mission success and affordability • Description of EW systems • Challenges facing the EW Test and Evaluation community • EW T&E process and capabilities • Description of significant developments to date • Moving EW T&E from flight towards modelling and simulation Security statement: Unclassified © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 2 Survival - Unintentional Threats • Lightning Strike • High intensity radiated fields (HiRF) • Electro-static discharge Bruce Fisher’s F-106B Typhoon undergoing full-threat Delta Dart was struck 714 lightning strike testing in BAE times during lightning Lightning strikes near taxying C-130 SYSTEMS EW Test Facility Hercules in Iraq research missions USAF Photo: Senior Airman James Croxon NASA Report SP-2003-4529 © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 3 Survival - Man-made Threats © Reproduced with the kind permission of Jane’s Information Group © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 4 Typical Missile Engagement Ranges vs. Missile Volume SA-21 SA-20 SA-10 SA-12 • Patriot SA-11, SA-17 SA-6 SA-3 SA-15 SA-19 SA-8 SA-16 SA-13 Roland SA-9 •SA-18 SA-14 • Rapier • Javelin SA-7 (USAF Photo by Airman 1st Class Jonathan Snyder) © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 5 Survivability and EW • EW is a vital element of survivability • Key capability of military aircraft • Assists survival to fulfil primary goal – mission success • Importance of ‘zero’ or ‘near zero’ attrition Photo: LCpl. Andrew Williams, US Marine Corps © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 6 Survivability components and terminology • Complex relationship between individual components • Applicable to land, sea and air platforms • Optimal survivability require balanced approach • Objective is best survivability needed to affordably achieve mission success / DEFENCE Source: Pywell, M., 2013. Development and management of high-fidelity test technology for comprehensive performance evaluation of electronic warfare systems in multi-threat environments. PhD. University of Central Lancashire, UK. © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 7 Survivability - The EW contribution DEFINITION: ‘Military action that exploits electromagnetic energy to provide situational awareness and achieve offensive and defensive effects.’* *North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Glossary of Terms and Definitions (English and French). AAP-06(2013) Available at http://nsa.nato.int/nsa/nsdd/listpromulg.html © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 8 EW Suite – functional block diagram © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 9 Typical Modern Defensive Aids System - Typhoon 6 5 1 2 4 1 3 1 3 1) Laser Warner 2) Avionics bay 3) Missile Warner 1 4 4) Flare dispenser 5) Chaff dispenser 6) ESM/ECM port pod 7) ESM/ECM starboard pod 5 8 8) RF towed decoy 7 © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 10 Modern EW Equipment Fit (Photos © SELEX-ES 2008-2013) © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 11 EW T&E Contribution to Challenging Solutions From ‘Improved Test Capabilities for Cost-effective Performance Evaluation of Airborne Electronic Warfare Systems’ (J. Royal Aeronautical Society, Sep-10), by these authors Challenge A S I E U Affordability Survivability Optimisation, Development and Sustainment of EW T&E Facilities Industrial Environmental Bolster chamber and laboratory test capability robustness UAS (UAV/UCAV) • To trap more problems prior to flight, saving T&E cost/time by reducing number of fly-fix-fly iterations required • To better support R&D, evaluation of prototype technical solutions and EW Technology Demonstrator Programmes • By generating more operationally realistic and measurable RF/IR/EO threat environments in laboratory/chambers Network EW T&E, Synthetic Environment (SE) and Modelling & Simulation (M&S) facilities – Benefits: • System requirements capture and optimisation, system development risk minimisation, training, tactics development Ensure long lead capabilities available in time. Anticipate: • Urgent Operational Requirements, upgrades and future EW fits • Upcoming ‘digital from back of sensor’ systems Rapid Development, Insertion & Acceptance of EW Systems Improvements Support increased EW acceptance process use of SE and M&S – provide facilities for robust validation of EW models EW Sensor placement optimisation via modelling and sub-/full-scale testing in anechoic chamber, to prevent, reduce, resolve problems with EW sensors/effectors, data links, communication systems and other RF sensors Laboratory/chamber R&D to understand mismatches between flight and ground test results Generate capability to perform mission rehearsal/optimisation in anechoic chamber’s secure RF environment Reduced Cost and Environmental Impact of EW T&E and Facilities Less flight testing and ground engine running = reduced fuel cost and carbon footprint More energy-efficient ground test facilities e.g. RF threat simulators Reduced RF environmental pollution: Radio/Radar/EW, EM Compatibility (EMC), lightning strike tests in chamber Codes Strong Contributor Medium Contributor Minor Contributor or Not Applicable © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 12 EW T&E Process From: Welch & Pywell NATO RTO AGARDograph 300 Vol.28, EW Test and Evaluation (Dec 2012). http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/AG/RTO-AG-300-V28///$$AG-300-V28-ALL.pdf © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 13 EW T&E Capabilities • Required to support system design, development and customer acceptance • Modelling and Simulation (M&S) • Sub-System and Avionics Integration Laboratories (SIL) • Hardware In The Loop (HITL) • Measurement Facilities (MF) © UK Crown copyright 2006 • Installed System Test Facilities (ISTF) • Open Air Ranges (OAR) © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 14 Modelling and Simulation M&S is: • Representation of reality via use of models and simulations • Used throughout the platform systems’ life cycle Testing EW systems can be considered a ‘simulation’ of their operational use © BAE Systems 2013 M&S examples used in EW T&E include: • Antenna pattern modelling • Full emitter scenario modelling within RF threat simulator Synthetic Environments – rising importance to EW T&E process © Northrop Grumman Amherst Systems 2006 © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 15 Systems Integration Laboratory Scenarios Emitter Library From ‘Testing Tomorrow’s EW System Today’: P.W. Richard, BAE SYSTEMS North America © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 16 Measurement Facilities Various Types of MF’s used for T&E of EW Systems: • Cover testing of: • Un-installed EW components, e.g. antennas • Platform-installed EW systems • Main types shown on this and next slides: • Radar Cross Section • Infra-Red Signatures EMC Tests on Open Air Test Site • Antenna performance © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 17 Radar Cross Section Measurement RCS Range: • 2–18 GHz ground plane range • Full polarisation – H, V and Cross • Absolute RCS data, 1D and 2D imagery • Component and full scale targets up to 35 tonnes and 15m • On 7m tall, 12 tonne Az/El low-RCS positioner Mobile RCS Measurements: • 2–40 GHz instrumentation radar system • Test articles from component to whole body targets of up to 12 m • Measure target in early and mid-life cycle, production stage and in service © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 18 Infra-Red Signature Measurement Key measurement capabilities: • Engine/plume measurements • Hotspot investigations and black body calibration • Thermal Imaging Cameras: • Medium Wave IR (3-5 μm) • Long Wave IR (8-12 μm) • Spectro-radiometer (1.25 – 14.8 μm) • Temperature range -20ºC to +1500ºC • Ground-to-Ground/-Air and Air-to-Air & -Ground © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 19 Antenna Pattern Measurement • Essential to know antenna pattern and gain • Data gathered from facilities shown Antenna Pattern Measurement • Data used to: • Support design verification • Validate Modelling & Simulation • Programme RF threat simulators © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 20 INSTALLED SYSTEM TEST FACILITIES Installed Systems Test Facilities • Large anechoic chambers • Limited examples world-wide, this is UK example • Recently upgraded: • 11 Channel CEESIM • Signal Measurement System • Infrastructure & Amplifiers RFEG ECM RMS © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 21 INSTALLED SYSTEM TEST FACILITIES Open Air Ranges www.raf.mod.uk/rafspadeadam/gallery.htm © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 22 INSTALLED SYSTEM TEST FACILITIES Significant Threat Simulator Developments to Date (1) Emitter modelling - • Fully Complex Emitters and Environment Realism • RF source improvements • RF pulse shaping • Optimal Use of RF Resources • Modelling of jammers and newer radar features • Pulse Modulator Components • Emitter antenna pattern modelling © Northrop Grumman Amherst Systems 2011 Pywell, M. ‘Developments in RF Simulator Technology – Approaching the Affordable Fidelity Limit’. The Aeronautical

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us