Implications of Macromolecular Crowding for Signal Transduction and Metabolite Channeling

Implications of Macromolecular Crowding for Signal Transduction and Metabolite Channeling

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 10547–10552, September 1998 Biochemistry Implications of macromolecular crowding for signal transduction and metabolite channeling JOHANN M. ROHWER*†,PIETER W. POSTMA*, BORIS N. KHOLODENKO‡, AND HANS V. WESTERHOFF*§¶ *E.C. Slater Institute, BioCentrum Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 12, NL-1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Pathology, Anatomy, and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Alumni Hall, Room 271, 1020 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107-6799; and §Institute for Molecular Biological Sciences, BioCentrum Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1087, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Edited by Peter H. von Hippel, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, and approved July 6, 1998 (received for review April 10, 1998) ABSTRACT The effect of different total enzyme concen- The effect of high protein concentrations—and of high trations on the flux through the bacterial phosphoenolpyru- protein activities caused by macromolecular crowding—on vate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) in vitro equilibrium phenomena, such as the binding of proteins to was determined by measuring PTS-mediated carbohydrate DNA, is understood and documented fairly well (6). However, phosphorylation at different dilutions of cell-free extract of the effects on nonequilibrium processes such as metabolic Escherichia coli. The dependence of the flux on the protein fluxes and signal transduction have not been investigated concentration was more than linear but less than quadratic. experimentally. In vitro, biochemistry often shows reaction The combined flux–response coefficient of the four enzymes rates proportional to the enzyme concentration. Extrapolation constituting the glucose PTS decreased slightly from values of to high protein concentration then should be simple indeed. '1.8 with increasing protein concentrations in the assay. However, for fluxes through signal transduction chains, it was Addition of the macromolecular crowding agents polyethylene pointed out recently that such simplicity must not be expected glycol (PEG) 6000 and PEG 35000 led to a sharper decrease (7, 8) because most individual reactions involve two macro- in the combined flux–response coefficient, in one case to molecules rather than one. values of '1. PEG 6000 stimulated the PTS flux at lower This feature of signal transduction chains has been elabo- protein concentrations and inhibited the flux at higher pro- rated most extensively for group-transfer pathways, in which a tein concentrations, with the transition depending on the PEG chemical group is transferred along a series of carriers. The 6000 concentration. This suggests that macromolecular bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotrans- crowding decreases the dissociation rate constants of enzyme ferase system (PTS; reviewed in ref. 9) is an example of such complexes. High concentrations of the microsolute glycerol a group-transfer pathway; the two-component regulatory sys- did not affect the combined flux–response coefficient. The tems of bacteria have similar properties. When E. coli takes up data could be explained with a kinetic model of macromolec- glucose, a phosphoryl group derived from intracellular phos- ular crowding in a two-enzyme group-transfer pathway. Our phoenolpyruvate is transferred along four different PTS pro- Glc Glc results suggest that, because of the crowded environment in teins [Enzyme I (EI), HPr, IIA , and IICB ] to the glucose the cell, the different PTS enzymes form complexes that live molecule, yielding intracellular glucose 6-phosphate and pyru- long on the time-scale of their turnover. The implications for vate. On simultaneous equal fractional increases in the con- the metabolic behavior and control properties of the PTS, and centrations of all glucose PTS enzymes, the flux through the for the effect of macromolecular crowding on nonequilibrium pathway may be expected to vary almost quadratically with processes, are discussed. enzyme concentration if all of the phosphotransfer reactions are kinetically bimolecular in both directions (i.e., in the case of immediate transfer or a ‘‘hit-and-run’’ mechanism, in which Understanding the functioning of the living cell on the basis of the life-times of the ternary complexes between different PTS processes studied in vitro is a central aim of biochemistry; enzymes and the bound phosphoryl group are negligible) (7, properties of biomolecules in vitro are extrapolated to the 8). Such a quadratic dependence contrasts with the linear situation in vivo. The concentrations of macromolecules in a relationship between enzyme concentrations and rates ob- biochemical assay are much lower than inside the living cell; served for ‘‘ideal’’ (10) metabolic pathways. Of more impor- total intracellular macromolecule concentrations (RNA and tance, it suggests that the fluxes through signal transduction y protein) of 340 mg ml have been measured in exponentially pathways in vivo may be much higher than expected from a growing Escherichia coli cells, with 70–73% thereof being simple extrapolation of in vitro results. protein (1). These high concentrations can lead to macromo- Moreover, in certain metabolic pathways, direct enzyme– lecular crowding (reviewed in refs. 2 and 3). The ensuing enzyme interactions occur, notably when the product of an nonideal equilibrium behavior of hemoglobin already was enzyme is transferred to the subsequent enzyme in the pathway reported by Adair (4). To mimic cellular conditions in a test without first equilibrating with the bulk aqueous phase (11–13). tube, inert macromolecular crowding agents such as polyeth- When such ‘‘metabolite channeling’’ occurs, the flux also will ylene glycol (PEG) can be added (2, 3); this then promotes depend nonlinearly on enzyme concentrations, again complicat- association between macromolecules. For example, addition of ing the extrapolation from vitrum to vivum. Indeed, metabolite PEG can overcome the inhibition of E. coli DNA polymerase channeling may be hard to demonstrate in vitro, as the degree of I activity by high salt concentrations (5), presumably by channeling itself may decrease when moving from in vivo to in effecting the association of DNA and the enzyme, whose interaction was loosened by the high ionic strength. This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the Proceedings office. Abbreviations: PTS, phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phospho- a The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge transferase system; MeGlc, methyl -D-glucopyranoside; PEG, poly- ethylene glycol. payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in †Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Stellen- accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. bosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. © 1998 by The National Academy of Sciences 0027-8424y98y9510547-6$2.00y0 ¶To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail address: PNAS is available online at www.pnas.org. [email protected]. 10547 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 10548 Biochemistry: Rohwer et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) vitro enzyme concentrations (13, 14). In the analysis of channel- where J is the flux through the pathway at steady state ing, one normally has to consider two competing routes: the (symbolized by subscript ss), and PTS is the total concentration ‘‘normal’’ route in which the intermediate is released into the bulk of the PTS enzymes under conditions in which their relative solution and the ‘‘channeled’’ route in which it is transferred proportions remain constant. By measuring MeGlc phosphor- directly between the enzymes (see also ref. 14). Group-transfer ylation activity for a range of cell-free extract concentrations, pathways represent a special case insofar as only the latter route the PTS flux could be determined as a function of protein occurs and the transferred group is never released into the bulk concentration (which was proportional to the total PTS en- phase: channeling is complete. Hence, a group-transfer pathway zyme concentration). The combined flux–response coefficient such as the PTS may serve as a model system for metabolite of the four glucose PTS enzymes was calculated from these channeling in which the complication of a varying degree of data by two independent methods. (i) A third-order polyno- channeling is absent. mial was fitted by least squares regression through the flux vs. Theoretical analyses have suggested that the dependence of protein concentration data in double-logarithmic space. The the flux through group-transfer and channeled pathways on first derivative of this function yielded the combined flux– the total enzyme concentration may vary between linear and response coefficient directly. (ii) The flux vs. protein concen- quadratic (and, in fact, beyond either limit) (7, 14). Conse- tration data were smoothed by fitting a cubic spline in linear quently, a decisive experimental analysis requires a quantifier space. To obtain the combined flux–response coefficient, the for this dependence. Such a quantifier is the combined flux– slope was scaled in each point by multiplying with the respec- response coefficient (15, 16) of all of the enzymes in the tive protein concentration and dividing by the flux. pathway, which is the ratio between the relative increase in flux Numerical Methods. Simulations and steady-state calcula- and the relative increase in total enzyme concentration

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us