Chapter 8 Basics of Hermitian Geometry

Chapter 8 Basics of Hermitian Geometry

Chapter 8 Basics of Hermitian Geometry 8.1 Sesquilinear Forms, Hermitian Forms, Hermitian Spaces, Pre-Hilbert Spaces In this chapter, we generalize the basic results of Eu- clidean geometry presented in Chapter 6 to vector spaces over the complex numbers. Some complications arise, due to complex conjugation. Recall that for any complex number z C,ifz = x + iy 2 where x, y R,welet z = x,therealpartofz,and z = y,theimaginarypartof2 < z. = We also denote the conjugate of z = x+iy as z = x iy, and the absolute value (or length, or modulus) of z as− z . Recall that z 2 = zz = x2 + y2. | | | | 479 480 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY There are many natural situations where a map ': E E C is linear in its first argument and only semilinear⇥ in! its second argument. For example, the natural inner product to deal with func- tions f : R C,especiallyFourierseries,is ! ⇡ f,g = f(x)g(x)dx, h i ⇡ Z− which is semilinear (but not linear) in g. Definition 8.1. Given two vector spaces E and F over the complex field C,afunctionf : E F is semilinear if ! f(u + v)=f(u)+f(v), f(λu)=λf(u), for all u, v E and all λ C. 2 2 8.1. SESQUILINEAR FORMS, HERMITIAN FORMS 481 Remark:Insteadofdefiningsemilinearmaps,wecould have defined the vector space E as the vector space with the same carrier set E,whoseadditionisthesameasthat of E,butwhosemultiplicationbyacomplexnumberis given by (λ, u) λu. 7! Then, it is easy to check that a function f : E C is ! semilinear i↵ f : E C is linear. ! We can now define sesquilinear forms and Hermitian forms. 482 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY Definition 8.2. Given a complex vector space E,afunc- tion ': E E C is a sesquilinear form i↵it is linear in its first⇥ argument! and semilinear in its second argu- ment, which means that '(u1 + u2,v)='(u1,v)+'(u2,v), '(u, v1 + v2)='(u, v1)+'(u, v2), '(λu, v)='(u, v), '(u, µv)=µ'(u, v), for all u, v, u1,u2, v1,v2 E,andallλ, µ C.A 2 2 function ': E E C is a Hermitian form i↵it is sesquilinear and⇥ if ! '(v, u)='(u, v) for all all u, v E. 2 Obviously, '(0,v)='(u, 0) = 0. 8.1. SESQUILINEAR FORMS, HERMITIAN FORMS 483 Also note that if ': E E C is sesquilinear, we have ⇥ ! '(λu + µv, λu + µv)= λ 2'(u, u)+λµ'(u, v) | | + λµ'(v, u)+ µ 2'(v, v), | | and if ': E E C is Hermitian, we have ⇥ ! '(λu + µv, λu + µv) = λ 2'(u, u)+2 (λµ'(u, v)) + µ 2'(v, v). | | < | | Note that restricted to real coefficients, a sesquilinear form is bilinear (we sometimes say R-bilinear). The function Φ: E C defined such that Φ(u)='(u, u) for all u E is called! the quadratic form associated with '. 2 484 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY The standard example of a Hermitian form on Cn is the map ' defined such that '((x ,...,x ), (y ,...,y )) = x y + x y + + x y . 1 n 1 n 1 1 2 2 ··· n n This map is also positive definite, but before dealing with these issues, we show the following useful proposition. Proposition 8.1. Given a complex vector space E, the following properties hold: (1) A sesquilinear form ': E E C is a Hermitian ⇥ ! form i↵ '(u, u) R for all u E. 2 2 (2) If ': E E C is a sesquilinear form, then ⇥ ! 4'(u, v)='(u + v, u + v) '(u v, u v) − − − + i'(u + iv, u + iv) i'(u iv, u iv), − − − and 2'(u, v)=(1+i)('(u, u)+'(v, v)) '(u v, u v) i'(u iv, u iv). − − − − − − These are called polarization identities. 8.1. SESQUILINEAR FORMS, HERMITIAN FORMS 485 Proposition 8.1 shows that a sesquilinear form is com- pletely determined by the quadratic form Φ(u)='(u, u), even if ' is not Hermitian. This is false for a real bilinear form, unless it is symmetric. For example, the bilinear form ': R2 R2 R defined such that ⇥ ! '((x ,y ), (x ,y )) = x y x y 1 1 2 2 1 2 − 2 1 is not identically zero, and yet, it is null on the diagonal. However, a real symmetric bilinear form is indeed deter- mined by its values on the diagonal, as we saw in Chapter 6. As in the Euclidean case, Hermitian forms for which '(u, u) 0playanimportantrole. ≥ 486 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY Definition 8.3. Given a complex vector space E,aHer- mitian form ': E E C is positive i↵ '(u, u) 0 for all u E,andpositive⇥ ! definite i↵ '(u, u) > 0forall≥ u =0.Apair2 E,' where E is a complex vector space and6 ' is a Hermitianh i form on E is called a pre-Hilbert space if ' is positive, and a Hermitian (or unitary) space if ' is positive definite. We warn our readers that some authors, such as Lang [22], define a pre-Hilbert space as what we define to be a Hermitian space. We prefer following the terminology used in Schwartz [26] and Bourbaki [7]. The quantity '(u, v)isusuallycalledtheHermitian prod- uct of u and v.Wewilloccasionallycallittheinner product of u and v. 8.1. SESQUILINEAR FORMS, HERMITIAN FORMS 487 Given a pre-Hilbert space E,' ,asinthecaseofaEu- clidean space, we also denoteh '(iu, v)as u v, or u, v , or (u v), · h i | and Φ(u)as u . k k p Example 1. The complex vector space Cn under the Hermitian form '((x ,...,x ), (y ,...,y )) = x y + x y + + x y 1 n 1 n 1 1 2 2 ··· n n is a Hermitian space. Example 2. Let l2 denote the set of all countably in- finite sequences x =(xi)i N of complex numbers such 2 2 n 2 that i1=0 xi is defined (i.e. the sequence i=0 xi converges as| n| ). | | P !1 P It can be shown that the map ': l2 l2 C defined such that ⇥ ! 1 ' ((xi)i N, (yi)i N)= xiyi 2 2 i=0 X is well defined, and l2 is a Hermitian space under '.Ac- tually, l2 is even a Hilbert space. 488 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY Example 3. Consider the set [a, b]ofpiecewisebounded Cpiece continuous functions f :[a, b] C under the Hermitian form ! b f,g = f(x)g(x)dx. h i Za It is easy to check that this Hermitian form is positive, but it is not definite. Thus, under this Hermitian form, [a, b]isonlyapre-Hilbertspace. Cpiece Example 4. Let [a, b]bethesetofcomplex-valued C continuous functions f :[a, b] C under the Hermitian form ! b f,g = f(x)g(x)dx. h i Za It is easy to check that this Hermitian form is positive definite. Thus, [a, b]isaHermitianspace. C The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Minkowski in- equalities extend to pre-Hilbert spaces and to Hermitian spaces. 8.1. SESQUILINEAR FORMS, HERMITIAN FORMS 489 Proposition 8.2. Let E,' be a pre-Hilbert space with associated quadratich formi Φ. For all u, v E, we have the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality: 2 '(u, v) Φ(u) Φ(v). | | Furthermore, if E,' is ap Hermitianp space, the equal- ity holds i↵ u andh v arei linearly dependent. We also have the Minkovski inequality: Φ(u + v) Φ(u)+ Φ(v). Furthermore,p if E,' is ap Hermitianp space, the equal- ity holds i↵ u andh v arei linearly dependent, where in addition, if u =0and v =0, then u = λv for some real λ such that6 λ>0. 6 As in the Euclidean case, if E,' is a Hermitian space, the Minkovski inequality h i Φ(u + v) Φ(u)+ Φ(v) shows that thep map u pΦ(u)isapnorm on E. 7! p 490 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY The norm induced by ' is called the Hermitian norm induced by '. We usually denote Φ(u)as u ,andtheCauchy-Schwarz inequality is written as k k p u v u v . | · |k kk k Since a Hermitian space is a normed vector space, it is atopologicalspaceunderthetopologyinducedbythe norm (a basis for this topology is given by the open balls B0(u, ⇢)ofcenteru and radius ⇢>0, where B (u, ⇢)= v E v u <⇢ . 0 { 2 |k − k } If E has finite dimension, every linear map is continuous. 8.1. SESQUILINEAR FORMS, HERMITIAN FORMS 491 The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality u v u v | · |k kk k shows that ': E E C is continuous, and thus, that is continuous.⇥ ! kk If E,' is only pre-Hilbertian, u is called a semi- normh . i k k In this case, the condition u =0 implies u =0 k k is not necessarily true. However, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality shows that if u =0,thenu v =0forallv E. k k · 2 We will now basically mirror the presentation of Euclidean geometry given in Chapter 6 rather quickly, leaving out most proofs, except when they need to be seriously amended. 492 CHAPTER 8. BASICS OF HERMITIAN GEOMETRY 8.2 Orthogonality, Duality, Adjoint of A Linear Map In this section, we assume that we are dealing with Her- mitian spaces. We denote the Hermitian inner product as u v or u, v . · h i The concepts of orthogonality, orthogonal family of vec- tors, orthonormal family of vectors, and orthogonal com- plement of a set of vectors, are unchanged from the Eu- clidean case (Definition 6.2). For example, the set [ ⇡,⇡]ofcontinuousfunctions C − f :[ ⇡,⇡] C is a Hermitian space under the product − ! ⇡ f,g = f(x)g(x)dx, h i ⇡ Z− ikx and the family (e )k Z is orthogonal.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us