Vol. 77 Wednesday, No. 100 May 23, 2012 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Rule To Remove the Morelet’s Crocodile From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 May 22, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\23MYR3.SGM 23MYR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 30820 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Executive Summary On May 26, 2005, the Service received a petition from the Government of (1) Purpose of the Regulatory Action Fish and Wildlife Service Mexico’s Comisio´n Nacional para el We are delisting the Morelet’s Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad 50 CFR Part 17 crocodile throughout its range due to (CONABIO) to remove the Morelet’s recovery under the Endangered Species crocodile from the List of Endangered [Docket No. FWS–R9–ES–2010–0030; Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and Threatened Wildlife at 50 CFR 92210–1113–0000–C6] Conservation actions by the three range 17.11. countries of Mexico, Belize, and Based on the information provided, RIN 1018–AV22 Guatemala have eliminated or the Service’s 90-day finding on the significantly reduced the threats to the petition, which was published in the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife species to point that it is no longer Federal Register on June 28, 2006 (71 and Plants; Final Rule To Remove the endangered or threatened. Wild FR 36743), stated that the petition Morelet’s Crocodile From the Federal populations have increased provided substantial information to List of Endangered and Threatened substantially since restrictions on indicate that the requested action may Wildlife commercial harvest and trade were be warranted. In that finding, we instituted in the 1970s. Species experts announced that we had initiated a status AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, now widely characterize Morelet’s review of the species as required under Interior. crocodile populations as healthy. section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act, and that ACTION: Final rule. we were seeking comments on the (2) Major Provision of the Regulatory petition, as well as information on the Action SUMMARY: Under the authority of the status of the species, particularly in Endangered Species Act of 1973, as This action is authorized by the Belize and Guatemala. The Service also amended (Act), we, the U.S. Fish and Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), solicited comments or additional Wildlife Service (Service), are removing as amended. information from counterparts in the Morelet’s crocodile (Crocodylus We are amending § 17.11(h), Mexico, Belize and Guatemala. moreletii) throughout its range from the subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the On April 27, 2011, the Service Federal List of Endangered and Code of Federal Regulations by published in the Federal Register a rule Threatened Wildlife due to recovery. removing the entry for ‘‘Crocodile, proposing to delist the Morelet’s This action is based on a thorough Morelet’s’’ from the List of Endangered crocodile from the Federal List of review of the best available scientific and Threatened Wildlife. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (76 FR 23650). With publication of the and commercial data, which indicate (3) Costs and Benefits that the species’ status has improved to proposed rule, we implemented the This is a delisting action, and the Service’s peer review process and the point that the Morelet’s crocodile is Office of Management and Budget not likely to become threatened within opened a 60-day comment period to (OMB) has designated it as not solicit scientific and commercial the foreseeable future throughout all or significant. Therefore, we have not information on the species from all a significant portion of its range. After analyzed the costs or benefits of this interested parties. For more detailed the effective date of this final rule, the rulemaking action. information on previous Federal Morelet’s crocodile will remain actions, please refer to the April 2011 protected under the provisions of the Previous Federal Actions proposed rule. Convention on International Trade in The Morelet’s crocodile was listed as We based this action on a review of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and endangered throughout its entire range the best scientific and commercial Flora. under the predecessor of the Act via a information available, including all DATES: This rule becomes effective June rule published in the Federal Register information received during the public 22, 2012. on June 2, 1970 (35 FR 8491). Import comment period. In the April 27, 2011, ADDRESSES: This final rule is available into, export from, or re-export from the proposed rule, we requested that all on the Internet at http:// United States, as well as other interested parties submit information www.regulations.gov and comments and prohibitions, including movement in that might contribute to development of materials received, as well as supporting the course of a commercial activity and a final rule. We also contacted documentation used in the preparation sale in interstate or foreign commerce, appropriate scientific experts and of this rule, will be available for public of endangered species and their parts organizations and invited them to inspection, by appointment, during and products, are prohibited under the comment on the proposed delisting. We normal business hours at: U.S. Fish and Act unless otherwise authorized. received comments from five Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Authorizations for endangered species individuals; two of those comments Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22203. can only be made for scientific purposes were from peer reviewers. or to enhance the propagation or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: survival of the species. On July 1, 1975, Summary of Comments and Janine Van Norman, Chief, Branch of the Morelet’s crocodile was listed in Recommendations Foreign Species, Endangered Species Appendix I of CITES. These protections We reviewed all comments we Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, were put in place because the species received from the public and peer 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420, had suffered substantial population reviewers for substantive issues and Arlington, VA 22203; telephone 703– declines throughout its range due to new information regarding the proposed 358–2171; facsimile 703–358–1735. If habitat destruction and overexploitation delisting of this species, and we address you use a telecommunications device through the commercial crocodilian those comments below. Overall, the for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal skin trade. CITES Appendix I includes commenters and peer reviewers Information Relay Service (FIRS) at species that are ‘‘threatened with supported the proposed delisting. Belize 800–877–8339. extinction which are or may be affected and Guatemala did not submit SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: by trade.’’ comments. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 May 22, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23MYR3.SGM 23MYR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 100 / Wednesday, May 23, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 30821 Peer Review as killing, subsistence hunting, and Our Response: We revised that section In accordance with our policy fishing net entanglement are unlikely to to reflect this correction. published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR constitute significant impacts to (6) Comment: One peer reviewer 34270), we solicited expert opinions population persistence or even to asserted our statement pertaining to from six individuals with scientific recovery. ‘‘Nests, usually constructed of leaf expertise that included familiarity with Our Response: We agree, and have mounds * * *’’ was incomplete. They the species, the geographic region in included revised language in this rule. stated that Morelet’s crocodile nests are which the species occurs, and (3) Comment: One peer reviewer constructed of various types and conservation biology principles. We stated that although the finding refers to components of vegetation such as received responses from two of the peer a ‘‘rule,’’ there were very few rules grasses and sedges, leaves and soil, as reviewers from whom we requested governing this species, unlike other well as other materials, such as woody comments. They generally agreed that crocodilian species such as the saltwater debris. the description of the biology and crocodile, some caimans, and Nile Our Response: We revised that section habitat for the species was accurate and crocodile, in which there are to include the other nesting materials based on all relevant literature. Some requirements governing trade, use, highlighted by the peer reviewer. new information was provided, as well marking, etc. (7) Comment: One peer reviewer as technical clarifications, as described Our Response: Those particular noted that the proposed rule had a below. Technical corrections suggested crocodilians were reclassified to number of repetitious sections where by the peer reviewers have been ‘‘Threatened’’ status under the Act with the same information was presented incorporated into this final rule. In some a special rule under section 4(d) of the almost word for word (e.g. the sections cases, it has been indicated in the Act, governing crocodilians (see 50 CFR describing Mexico’s 2010 CITES citations by ‘‘personal communication’’ 17.42(c)). The Service notes that the proposal.) (pers. comm.), which could indicate Morelet’s crocodile is being delisted, Our Response: We agree, and have either an email or telephone and will no longer fall under the limited the CITES 2010 discussion to conversation; in other cases, the provisions of the Act, and therefore will Factor D., Inadequacy of Existing research citation is provided. Public have no further requirements under the Regulatory Mechanisms, Mexico’s Comments Act. However, this species will be Proposal To Transfer the Morelet’s The Service only received substantive subject to the requirements of 50 CFR Crocodile to CITES Appendix II.