Riparian and Woodlot Landscape Patterns and Migration of Neotropical Migrants in Riparian Forests of Eastern South Dakota1

Riparian and Woodlot Landscape Patterns and Migration of Neotropical Migrants in Riparian Forests of Eastern South Dakota1

Riparian and Woodlot Landscape Patterns and Migration of neotropical Migrants in Riparian Forests of Eastern South Dakota1 David L. Swanson,2 Kurt L. Dean,3 Heather A. Carlisle,4 and Eric T. Liknes2 ________________________________________ Abstract Introduction Woodland habitat types in the northern Great Plains Woodland habitats in the northern Great Plains are compose only a very small fraction of the total land scarce, making up less than 4 percent of the total land surface. These woodlands occur primarily as natural surface area in southeastern South Dakota (Castonguay riparian forests or as scattered anthropogenic woodlots 1982). Two principal types of woodland habitats and shelterbelts. Natural riparian woodlands have been currently exist in this area, natural riparian corridor markedly reduced over the past century, but anthropo- woodlands and human-planted farmstead woodlots and genic woodlands have increased during this same peri- shelterbelts. Historically, woodlands in eastern South od. In this paper, we review and synthesize mist net Dakota existed almost exclusively along riparian and point count data from riparian corridor woodlands corridors (Van Bruggen 1996). The extent of these (Missouri and Big Sioux rivers) and farmstead wood- natural woodlands has been markedly reduced by lots in southeastern South Dakota to compare neotropi- clearing for agriculture and inundation behind dams. cal migrant abundance, species richness, diversity, and For example, Hesse et al. (1988) documented reduc- community similarity in these two habitats during tions of at least 41 percent in riparian woodland area spring and fall migrations. We hypothesized that the along the Missouri River from the mouth to Ponca, larger and more contiguous woodland area and greater Nebraska, since the late 1800s. The section of river vegetative diversity of riparian corridor woodlands rel- studied by Hesse et al. (1988) is downstream from the ative to woodlots would attract higher numbers and dams, so does not include woodland area lost by more species of neotropical migrants. Point count inundation under reservoirs. Natural woodland area in abundances were higher in woodlots than in riparian eastern South Dakota, however, has been supplemented corridors in both spring and fall, whereas capture rates since the time of European settlement by human- were similar in spring, but higher in Missouri River planted woodlands around agricultural fields and woodlands than at other sites in fall. Species richness farmsteads. Such artificial woodlands occur in narrow and diversity were similar in riparian corridors and linear strips (shelterbelts) or as larger, less linear, woodlots at both seasons. Community overlap between woodlots. The size and vegetative diversity of shelter- riparian corridors and woodlots was high in spring, but belts and woodlots are lower than those for natural was lower in fall. In general, these data suggest that riparian woodlands (Martin 1980, Dean 1999). overall abundance and diversity of neotropical migrant communities are similar between riparian corridors and neotropical migrants occur in both natural and artificial farmstead woodlots, despite some differences for indi- woodlands during migration through eastern South vidual species. In addition, recaptured migrants were Dakota (Martin 1980, Tallman et al. 2002). Populations capable of gaining mass during stopover in woodlots. of many of these species are declining (e.g., Robbins et Farmstead woodlots appear to effectively supplement al. 1989). Reductions in available stopover habitat al- natural riparian corridor woodlands as stopover sites ong the migratory route potentially contribute to these for neotropical migrants. Thus, conservation of even population declines because migration is a period of small woodland parcels may benefit neotropical wood- the annual cycle where energy demands peak (Moore land migrants during migration. et al. 1995). Since marked reductions in available rip- arian corridor woodlands in the northern Great Plains have occurred concomitantly with increases in artificial woodland habitats, artificial woodlands might serve, at least partially, to substitute as stopover habitat for lost riparian corridor woodlands. No previous studies have __________ compared neotropical migrant use of these two habitats 1A version of this paper was presented at the Third Interna- during migration. We studied migrant use of these tional Partners in Flight Conference, March 20-24, 2002, woodland habitats using both mist nets and point Asilomar Conference Grounds, California. 2 counts to determine if abundance, species richness, and Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, diversity of neotropical migrants during migration dif- SD 57069. E-mail: [email protected]. 3Department of Biology, Central Missouri State University, fer between natural riparian corridor woodlands and Warrensburg, MO 64093. farmstead woodlots in southeastern South Dakota. We 4SCE NRO NALF SCI, P.O. Box 35704, San Diego, CA 92135. reasoned that the greater woodland area, more contig- USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. 2005 541 Wooded Lanscapes and Migration – Swanson et al. uous nature of woodland habitats, and higher vegeta- were pooled. In neither riparian corridors nor the tive diversity of riparian corridor woodlands should woodlot was sampling conducted on days with rain or make them more favorable as stopover habitat for with winds in excess of 35 km/h. For captured birds we neotropical migrants than farmstead woodlots. Thus, measured mass to the nearest 0.1 g (Ohaus LS200 we hypothesized that neotropical migrant abundance, Model portable scale), wing chord, tarsus, and visible species richness, and diversity should be higher in fat (on a scale of 0-5, Helms and Drury 1960). Birds natural riparian corridor woodlands than in were then banded with a standard U.S. Geological Sur- anthropogenic farmstead woodlots. vey aluminum leg band and released. Methods Mist Net and Point Count Sampling N Vermillion River Vermillion C la y C * UCSP re 10 km We review here point count and mist net data for ek k e * e r neotropical migrants from Dean (1999) for riparian r e C v i * ** R corridors in southeastern South Dakota and from e l u r * B Carlisle (1998) and Swanson et al. (2003) for farmstead MYGR woodlots in the same area. Dean (1999) studied four CLAY Vermillion BSR riparian corridor woodland sites in Clay and Union Mis sour i Clay County Union County Union counties, South Dakota, two in the Missouri River rip- x u o i arian corridor, one in the Big Sioux River riparian cor- S R ridor, and one on a tributary (Brule Creek) of the Big iver Sioux River (fig. 1). Prominent neotropical migrants in southeastern South Dakota are flycatchers, vireos, Big thrushes, warblers, and tanagers (Tallman et al. 2002). Other neotropical migrant species, such as cuckoos, Gray Catbird (Dumetella carolinensis), grosbeaks, Ind- igo Buntings (Passerina cyanea), and orioles, migrate Figure 1— Map of the study area in southeastern South through and also nest in the area; and resident and mig- Dakota showing the locations of the four riparian corridor rant birds of these species are difficult to distinguish. and the six woodlot (asterisks) study sites. MYGR and For this study, we limited analyses to flycatchers, vir- CLAY are study sites in the riparian corridor woodlands of eos, thrushes, warblers, and tanagers to reduce the con- the Missouri River. The BSR study site is in the riparian founding effects of residents in the analyses. corridor of the Big Sioux River and the UCSP study site includes riparian woodland along Brule Creek (a tributary Dean (1999) conducted point counts and mist net of the Big Sioux River) and adjacent (and contiguous) upland deciduous forest. Modified from Dean (1999). sampling (5-7 9-m nets, 30-mm mesh) daily, weather permitting, during both spring (15 April-2 June) and Swanson et al. (2003) surveyed seven points in six fall (15 August-5 October) migration periods in 1993- different farmstead woodlots (fig. 1), which ranged 1995. Sampling was rotated among the four study sites from about 0.7 to 3.5 hectares in area. The largest on a 4-d cycle. Spring and fall sampling periods cov- woodlot had two points separated by over 200 m. All ered the bulk of the neotropical migrant movement other woodlots had a single survey point. Woodlot through eastern South Dakota (Tallman et al. 2002). points were surveyed three times per week during the Point counts and mist net sampling (7-10 9-m nets, 30- migration periods. Each riparian corridor study site had mm mesh) were conducted during the same dates in 5-10 survey points established at 200-m intervals along spring and fall in 1996 and 1997 in woodlots in Clay roughly linear transects (Dean 1999). Fixed radius (25- and Union counties, South Dakota (Carlisle 1998, m) point counts were used in both studies (Hutto et al. Swanson et al. 2003). Farmstead woodlot mist netting 1986). Surveys at each point lasted 10 min and all birds was conducted in a single woodlot of about 3.5 hec- detected by sight or by sound, and their distances from tares in area for at least six days per week, weather per- the point center (inside or outside of 25 m), were rec- mitting, during the migration periods. In riparian orded. Birds observed while walking between points corridor woodlands, nets were opened from sunrise un- were also identified and counted as beyond 25 m from til approximately 1100 CST. Mist nests were opened the point center. Point counts in both studies were con- during the same time period in the farmstead woodlot, ducted between 0600 and 1000 CST and survey routes but nets were also often opened for 2-3 h prior to sun- were traversed in opposite directions on successive set. Capture rates did not differ substantially for morn- counts to reduce possible temporal variation. Point ing and evening capture periods in woodlots, so data count surveys were not undertaken on days with rain or USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us