REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 20 N umber 3 May-June 2010 WILL PROXIMITY TALKS END THE OCCUPATION? By Geoffrey Aronson And the truth is, in some of these conflicts the United States can’t impose solutions The formal inauguration of proximi - unless the participants in these conflicts are willing to break out of old patterns of ty talks between Israel and the PLO antagonism. I think it was former secretary of state Jim Baker who said, in the con - signifies the high-water mark of 17 text of Middle East peace, “we can’t want it more than they do.” months of diplomacy conducted by the But what we can make sure of is, is that we are constantly present, constantly Obama administration. After a ran - engaged, and setting out very clearly to both sides our belief that not only is it in the corous false start in March precipitated interests of each party to resolve these conflicts but it’s also in the interest of the by an ill-timed announcement of settle - United States. It is a vital national security interest of the United States to reduce ment plans in East Jerusalem on the eve these conflicts because whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military of a visit by Vice President Joe Biden, superpower, and when conflicts break out, one way or another we get pulled into formal proximity talks finally com - them. And that ends up costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure. menced on May 8. So I’m going to keep on at it. But I think on all these issues—nuclear disarma - Hanan Ashrawi, the veteran Pale- ment, nuclear proliferation, Middle East peace—progress is going to be measured not stinian negotiator, on May 3 said of in days, not in weeks. It’s going to take time. And progress will be halting. And the limited process sponsored by the sometimes we’ll take one step forward and two steps back, and there will be frustra - Obama administration. “I would not call tions. And so it’s not going to run on the typical cable news 24/7 news cycle. But if them negotiations but rather diplomatic we’re persistent, and we’ve got the right approach, then over time, I think that we shuttle tours undertaken by the Ameri- can make progress. can envoy.” President Barack Obama. Press Conference by the Some terms governing the talks were President at the Nuclear Security Summit, April 13, 2010 modified in the wake of the March debacle. The United States appears to have reached agreement on two issues recent dispute between Jerusalem and Bank and Gaza Strip with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Washington over East Jerusalem settle - Notwithstanding suggestions to the Netanyahu. Although the immediate ment expansion may be a broad re- contrary, the consistent and impassioned aim of diplomacy is to move to a direct examination of U.S. policy. Two impor - articulation by top U.S. officials, includ - Israeli-Palestinian dialogue, the proxim - tant principles guiding U.S. policy ing the president, of a “vital U.S. nation - ity talks would indeed offer a forum to towards the Israel-Palestine conflict can al interest” in ending Israel’s occupation discuss, if not negotiate, “core issues”— be discerned from these recent state - and creating a Palestinian state at peace settlements, borders, refugees, security, ments by President Obama and two with Israel is unprecedented. It also sug - Jerusalem, and water; and notwithstand - senior aides: gests a new determination to solve ing insistent Israeli declarations about a I The definition of the resolution of rather than manage the problem, not as continuing commitment to settlement the conflict as “a vital national security a favor to the parties but first and fore - expansion in East Jerusalem, Israel interest of the United States” most as a consequence of a hard-headed would refrain from unspecified “provoc- I The framing of the challenge fac - determination to safeguard U.S. inter - ative” settlement activities. ing U.S. policymakers as one requiring ests. reconciling Israel’s legitimate security This central strategic conclusion is, A Policy Rethink requirements with the demands of The most important result of the Palestinian sovereignty in the West PROXIMITY TALKS , continued on page 6 TO OUR READERS FOUNDATION FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE Skeptics of all U.S. efforts to help democracy and civil society. “Shared val - Israelis and Palestinians make peace over ues,” proclaimed as the cement of the U.S.- Merle Thorpe, Jr. the years have argued that conditions have Israel alliance, is becoming a threadbare Founder not been “ripe” for a solution and that slogan, and this unique relationship is at (1917–1994) peace-making should await more favorable risk. A similar extremist trend is infecting circumstances. Yet there is overwhelming the politics of Palestinians and their sup - Philip C. Wilcox, Jr. evidence that this conflict has grown ever port for a two-state peace. President more intractable with the passage of time. A lasting two-state peace agreement will Geoffrey Aronson Advice that efforts to make peace should therefore require transforming Israel’s dete - Director, Research and wait, or even pause, underestimates the riorating political culture and institutions Publications, Editor, Report on threat that the situation may be moving and mobilizing a pragmatic, democratic lib - Israeli Settlement in the Occupied toward irreversibility. The danger is not eral, pro-peace majority. Israeli politics are Territories only that a massive, growing settlement still divided and volatile. It is not too late Nitzan Goldberger effort is physically transforming the West to achieve such change through unprece - Waseem Mardini Bank. Even more important, forty years of dented strong, sustained U.S. diplomacy, Editorial Assistants military occupation, settlement and conflict private and public, and wise use of the have changed Israel’s political culture for American-Israeli relationship. The risks to Mohammed Abdalhadi the worse. American national security of anything less Monica Kamen Interns Israeli policies today, foreign and domes - are unacceptable. There is another reason tic, are increasingly shaped by hard-line why waiting is not an option. The U.S., as TRUSTEES religious, ideological, and security leaders, Israel’s best friend, protector, and often whose devotion to land, messianic religion, enabler, is just too deeply involved to step Landrum R. Bolling and power is at odds with liberal, Enligh- back. Calvin H. Cobb, Jr. tenment values. Their right-wing ethos is James J. Cromwell penetrating Israel’s institutions, including Peter Gubser schools and the military, and threatening its Stephen Hartwell Richard S.T. Marsh —————— N —————— Richard W. Murphy Jean C. Newsom Gail Pressberg William B. Quandt Anyone who observes the Arab or Palestinian official stand in run - Nicholas A. Veliotes ning negotiations with the Zionist enemy, will unfortunately notice confusion, turmoil, persistence and even a move away from past posi - The Foundation, a non- tions. Indeed, one month ago, before the Sert [Arab] Summit, the profit I.R.C. 501(c)(3) organization, supports peace [Arab League] made a connection between returning to negotiations and security for Israelis and and freezing the settlements. The summit of Sert also stressed this Palestinians through mutual through an Arab resolution. Today, during its last meeting in Cairo recognition and a negotiated division of historic Pales- the Arab Initiative Committee backed away from this and thus the tine. It publishes the bi- condition of freezing settlements. This weakens the Arab and monthly Report on Israeli Palestinian position and entices Israel to increase its militancy and Settlement in the Occupied Territories . settlements in addition to ignoring Palestinian and Arab demands. Copyright © 2010 As to the issue of guarantees, there are no American guarantees, and Sign up to receive the no written guarantees. Any verbal guarantees, if present, are worth - Report by e-mail, to be less. Therefore we are against the return to negotiations with the notified of events in Zionists. Washington, D.C., and Khalid Meshal, Hamas leader, interview, al-Masri al-Yawm , May 12, 2010 more. Visit us at www.fmep.org. 2 O Report on Israeli Settlement May-June 2010 What Freeze? Construction Summary of 2009 reports by Amihai Attali of Ma’ariv , the day after the tree planting, Kfar Etzion settlement received a verbal message There were 1,703 housing starts in West Bank settlements from the Prime Minister’s bureau that the settlement would in 2009 according to data released by Israel’s Central Bureau not be included in the freeze, and twenty houses were of Statistics (CBS) in February 2010. This number compares removed from the list. to 1,518 starts in 2006, 1,471 starts during 2007, and 2,107 Amihai Attali, Ma’ariv , March 21, 2010 starts in 2008, during which construction was expedited in the wake of the November 2007 Annapolis conference. Construc- ————————————— tion on 2,077 housing units was completed in 2009. CBS also reported that as of December 2009, soon after the construc - Israeli Construction Company tion moratorium went into effect, a total of 2,778 housing Demands Compensation for Freeze units were in various stages of construction in West Bank Construction companies affected by the settlement freeze settlements. initiated by the Israeli government have started suing the ————————————— State of Israel for financial compensation. A construction company in Modi’in Ilit, Neot Hapisga, has filed a claim is Construction Freeze Compensation demanding $4.8 million in compensation from the govern - ment for damages. The [Israeli] cabinet will soon be asked to approve $27,000 . Neot Hapisga said it had been in the midst of con - in compensation to 3,000 settler families that were harmed as structing hundreds of housing units in the settlement of a result of the construction freeze.