Disability Embodiment, Speculative Fiction, and the Testbed of Futurity Stuart Murray University of Leeds Disability Embodiment, Speculative Fiction, and the Testbed of Futurity The article analyses depictions of disability embodiment in a range of contem- porary North American speculative fiction that depicts post-crisis worlds of social and environmental breakdown. It argues that in each novel bodies are threatened and placed under pressure, particularly in terms of capacity and function. While some resolve this through recourse to humanist narratives of restitution, others imagine futures in which both bodies and societies become reformatted. Bodies remain material, but they also become metamorphized and messy; they hold charged manifestations of personhood, but also leak these conceptions of “person;” they are recognizably human, but also patterned as posthuman. The results are depictions of disability-led embodiment that, precisely because they are formed in imagined possibilities of the future, offer productive possibilities for re-visioning the present. Testbedding The phrase “testbed of futurity” appears in William Gibson’s 1996 novel Idoru, the middle text in his Bridge trilogy (also containing Virtual Light (1993) and All Tomorrow’s Parties (1999)). Idoru is a recognizable Gibson narrative, where vulnerable central protagonists pursue meaning through urban landscapes saturated with data and technological adaptations, ignorant of crucial information and under the threat of physical harm. The trilogy is also a near-future speculative fiction, with events taking place in the early twenty-first century following the outbreak of “Kansas City flu,” a new global pandemic, though in fact the virus only features in the novels in occasional references to a recent past involving necessary mask-wearing. This future is not about lockdown or social restriction; rather it is—in classic Gibson style— concerned with the promise and danger of the virtual (the idoru of the title is Rei Toei, a highly sophisticated Japanese Artificial Intelligence (AI), synthetic Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies © Liverpool University Press ISSN 1757-6458 (print) 1757-6466 (online) https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2021.21 Published open access under a CC BY licence. https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ This document was generated by CloudPublish for 86.22.195.211 on 2021-05-17, 19:05:03 1621278303GMTC OPEN ACCESS 2 Stuart Murray singer and personality, whose proposed marriage to a real-life pop star provides the narrative drama).1 Protagonist Colin Laney, a data specialist hired to trace the online lives of celebrities, becomes lost in the confusion of a real-virtual Tokyo. At one point, unsure of his role or the motivation for his actions, he bursts out in frustration during a conversation with Michio Kuwayama, an expert in the creation of Japanese AI entertainments: “What is all this about?”, Laney fulminates; Kuwayama replies, “It’s about futurity,” and continues, “‘We have never developed a sinister view of technology, Mr. Laney. It is an aspect of the natural, of oneness. Through our efforts, oneness perfects itself.’ Kuwayama smiled. ‘And popular culture […] is the testbed of our futurity’” (238). It is in the complexities of technology’s interaction with the cultural and the social, Gibson stresses, that the future will be developed and refined. In this article I ask what speculative fiction, and particularly a selection of very contemporary novels (which build on the kinds of foundations laid by writers such as Gibson), suggest disability futures are—to echo Colin Laney— about and what constitutes the testbed on which they play out their narratives, particularly in the context of the changes and uncertainties wrought by Covid-19. Because of word limitation, my method is designed necessarily to be exploratory, with an aim to point towards future work that can unpack the complexities raised here in more detail. The novels I discuss have all been published in North America in the last seven years: Emily St John Mandel’s Station Eleven (2014), Jeff VanderMeer’s Borne (2017), Cherie Dimaline’s The Marrow Thieves (2017), Ling Ma’s Severance (2018), Peng Shepherd’s The Book of M (2018), Thea Lim’s An Ocean of Minutes (2018) and Larissa Lai’s The Tiger Flu (2018). While my argument is drawn from my reading of all these, the central focus is on The Marrow Thieves, Borne, and The Tiger Flu. To undertake this enquiry is to consider the place of material bodies and cognitive difference in the imagining of possible spaces of futurity, often in terms of radically altered realities. In the novels discussed here, these can be post-apocalyptic dystopias, societies ravaged by pandemics, cartographies of ecological disaster and discarded biotechnologies, landscapes of moral and ethical challenges, and areas of psychological rejection, as well as the communities of survivors who move through them. The locations are often spaces of violence in which bodies are subjected to pressure, marked or broken, and where psychological states and fluctuations of emotion underpin narrative development. They can also be stories of the threat of potential extinction 1. Idoru is a Japanese phrase and concept that has no real translation into English but refers to a female icon of popular culture. This document was generated by CloudPublish for 86.22.195.211 on 2021-05-17, 19:05:03 1621278303GMTC OPEN ACCESS Disability Embodiment, Speculative Fiction, and the Testbed of Futurity 3 depicted as embodied contagion, what Priscilla Wald has termed “outbreak narratives.” In each, disability-as-difference is a constant, the marked body as a signifier of change and, at times, fear;2 but disability-as-becoming is also a frequent presence, where the relationship between body and self is more provisional and productive because of the details in the novels’ imagined futures. Such reformatting contests the idea that the body is inherently the host for identity and challenges normative formulations of disability (as well as gender, race, and other formations) that emerge from such a view. In my readings of the fiction, bodies appear as realist and physical, but also metamorphized and messy; they hold charged manifestations of personhood, but also leak these conceptions of “person;” they are recognizably human, but also patterned as posthuman. The results are depictions of disability that, precisely because they are formed in imagined possibilities of the future, revise formations of the dis/abled conjunction and its meaning. In the most insightful of these contemporary fictions new possibilities of bodies suggest futures in which lines between capability, agency, and social participation are negotiated. Speculating on Disability Matters Speculative fiction is, R. B. Gill observes, “a widely read but ill-defined grouping of works, [that] fits uneasily into our notions of standard literature […] speculative fiction is marked by diversity; there is no limit to possible micro- subjects and, understandably in such a mixed field, no standard definition” (71, 72; see also Booker). In the words of Margaret Atwood, it is writing that focuses on worlds that “don’t exist” and this “non-existence is of a different order than the non-existence of the realistic novel.” It “can explore the consequences of new and proposed technologies in graphic ways by showing them as fully operational […] [and] can explore the nature and limits of what it means to be human in very explicit ways, by pushing the human envelope as far as it will go in the direction of the not-quite human” (In Other Worlds 62–63). It is distracting to spend too much time on issues surrounding labelling, but I want to stress that the novels discussed here are best seen as speculative, and not science, fiction. The most incisive exploration of the representation of disability in science fiction comes in the work of Ria Cheyne, who reads disability 2. Wald makes a link to disability clear, noting how outbreak narratives often “promote […] the stigmatizing of individuals, groups, populations, locales (regional and global), behaviors, and lifestyles” (3). See also Magnusson and Zalloua, and Lynteris. This document was generated by CloudPublish for 86.22.195.211 on 2021-05-17, 19:05:03 1621278303GMTC OPEN ACCESS 4 Stuart Murray depictions through the genre’s utilization of “varieties of wonder” (87), but one of the ways in which disability in speculative fiction might be differentiated from science fiction is that the novels I examine here rarely, if ever, produce the kinds of wonder that Cheyne highlights. Embodiment or cognitive difference in these texts is far more likely to exist in spaces of contested belonging, frustrated incomprehension, and jaded indifference than awe, admiration, or curiosity. In addition—and this is crucial to my argument—such difference in speculative fiction slides away from an immediately recognizable sense of the disabled subject as disabled, where disability is seen as a straightforward signing of body or mind that signals itself to a reader as an identifiable and apprehensible entity. Rather, the most thoughtful contemporary speculative fictions of disaster and social breakdown place all bodies under pressure, and that which might be conventionally read as disabled (in terms of standard notions of absence, lack, or loss) becomes overturned, producing embodied states that consequently become markers of a re-formed futurity. The best of this fiction presents “bodyminds reimagined,” to use Sami Schalk’s provocative title from her study of disability, gender, and race in Black women’s speculative fiction, a process that “changes the rules of interpretation,” a phrase I find enabling in terms of both reading creative depictions of embodiment and forming critical approaches when exploring such creativity (3). I want to emphasize that to re-think interpretation in the ways that Schalk encourages is not to negate disabled agency and presence; rather it heralds a critical process that places innovative disability-led embodiment at the centre of futurity narratives, championing the often-radical potential of the disabled body.