Microbial Battery for Efficient Energy Recovery

Microbial Battery for Efficient Energy Recovery

Microbial battery for efficient energy recovery Xing Xiea,b, Meng Yea, Po-Chun Hsub, Nian Liuc, Craig S. Criddlea,1, and Yi Cuib,d,1 Departments of aCivil and Environmental Engineering, bMaterials Science and Engineering, and cChemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and dStanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Edited by Harry B. Gray, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, and approved August 9, 2013 (received for review April 18, 2013) By harnessing the oxidative power of microorganisms, energy can matter and other electron donors in diverse environments (4). be recovered from reservoirs of less-concentrated organic matter, Because these systems evolved under strong competitive pres- such as marine sediment, wastewater, and waste biomass. Left sures to meet microbial needs for energy (10), hijacking them for unmanaged, these reservoirs can become eutrophic dead zones human purposes requires understanding of factors that influence and sites of greenhouse gas generation. Here, we introduce a microbial competition for energy. The most important factor is unique means of energy recovery from these reservoirs—amicrobial the nature of the available oxidants. In reservoirs rich in electron battery (MB) consisting of an anode colonized by microorganisms donors, the strongest oxidant (O2 in aerobic systems) is used first, − and a reoxidizable solid-state cathode. The MB has a single-chamber followed by use of progressively weaker oxidants [NO3 > Mn fi 2− con guration and does not contain ion-exchange membranes. (IV) minerals > Fe(III) minerals > SO4 > CO2] (10). Carbon Bench-scale MB prototypes were constructed from commercially dioxide, the least powerful oxidant, is used last and is often the available materials using glucose or domestic wastewater as elec- sole remaining oxidant in electron donor-rich anaerobic envi- tron donor and silver oxide as a coupled solid-state oxidant elec- ronments. A significant fraction of the electrons removed trode. The MB achieved an efficiency of electrical energy conversion (∼90%) is transferred to methane which can concentrate in the of 49% based on the combustion enthalpy of the organic matter gas phase (11). The high efficiency of electron transfer to consumed or 44% based on the organic matter added. Electro- methane and the ease of methane recovery from water make chemical reoxidation of the solid-state electrode decreased net methane fermentation a useful benchmark for energy recovery efficiency to about 30%. This net efficiency of energy recovery via microbial biotechnology. However, use of methane fermen- (unoptimized) is comparable to methane fermentation with com- fi tation for energy generation has limitations: ef cient digestion of SCIENCES bined heat and power. biomass requires hydrolysis and fermentation at warm temper- ENVIRONMENTAL atures (>20 °C) (6, 11); inefficient capture of methane and losses bioelectrochemical system | microbial fuel cells | exoelectrogens | during transport lead to energy losses, greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy and explosion hazards; and the collected biogas often requires clean-up to remove contaminants (hydrogen sulfide and silox- urrent global energy demand is ∼5.3 × 1020 J/y (1). Most of anes), limiting applications to large-scale digesters (12). Cthis demand (>80%) is met by extraction and oxidation of Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) offer an option for direct elec- the fossil carbon present in concentrated organic reservoirs as oil tricity generation from electron donors oxidized by micro- (32%), coal (27%), and natural gas (21%) (1). About 31% (1.7 × organisms (13) and have been used to recover electricity from 1020 J/y) is used to produce 7.7 × 1019 J/y of electrical energy with domestic wastewater and marine sediment (6, 14–16). Like an energy conversion efficiency of ∼46% (1). The proven un- chemical fuel cells, oxidation occurs at an anode, and electrons × 22 tapped reserves of oil, coal, and natural gas are 9.1 10 J (2). pass through an external circuit to a cathode where O2 is re- Without carbon sequestration, these supplies would result in sig- duced. At the anode, however, chemical catalysts are replaced by nificant greenhouse gas emissions (1, 3). Identification of supplies exoelectrogens—microorganisms that oxidize the electron donors that avoid such releases is a pressing challenge (4). One prom- and transfer the electrons to an electrode (17). For MFCs, energy ising option is the use of less-concentrated reservoirs of organic recovery is limited by a voltage loss when O2 is reduced at the matter. An untapped resource is the organic matter in marine cathode. This loss is exacerbated by MFC operating conditions— 22 sediment, estimated to contain 5.2 × 10 J of stored chemical atmospheric pressure, ambient temperature, and an aqueous energy if oxidized with oxygen (5). Other reservoirs of less- — concentrated organic matter are also as yet untapped in part Significance because they are often viewed as waste, and in part because the technology needed to recover energy from less-concentrated This work introduces a microbial battery for recovery of energy reservoirs is inefficient. If not oxidized, these organics can de- from reservoirs of organic matter, such as wastewater. Micro- plete the oxygen reserves of aquatic ecosystems and stimulate organisms at an anode oxidize dissolved organic substances, release of methane to the atmosphere. An example is domestic releasing electrons to an external circuit, where power can be wastewater, a threat to aerobic aquatic ecosystems. The organic extracted. The electrons then enter a solid-state electrode that matter in domestic wastewater is theoretically sufficient to gen- remains solid as electrons accumulate within it. The solid-state erate ∼7.4 × 1018 J/y: three to four times more energy than is electrode is periodically removed from the battery, oxidized, needed to treat the wastewater (6). However, 3% of the elec- and reinstalled for sustained power production. Molecular oxygen trical load of developed countries is currently required to treat is not introduced into the battery, and ion-exchange membranes wastewater (7). Another waste example is the biomass produced are avoided, enabling high efficiencies of energy recovery. through photosynthesis, most of which is not used for human needs. Globally, 4.5 × 1021 J/y are stored in biomass generated by × 19 Author contributions: X.X., C.S.C., and Y.C. designed research; X.X., M.Y., P.-C.H., and N.L. photosynthesis (8). About 1% (5.0 10 J/y) is harvested for performed research; X.X., M.Y., C.S.C., and Y.C. analyzed data; and X.X., M.Y., P.-C.H., N.L., human energy needs (9). The remaining biomass can undergo C.S.C., and Y.C. wrote the paper. uncontrolled anaerobic biodegradation, with ensuing greenhouse The authors declare no conflict of interest. gas emissions. This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. Effective energy extraction from less-concentrated organic 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or ccriddle@ reservoirs can potentially be achieved with microbial biotechnology. stanford.edu. Self-assembled microbial communities have optimized energy This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. extraction systems that allow efficient in situ oxidation of organic 1073/pnas.1307327110/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1307327110 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 Fig. 1. Schematic of two-step energy generation process using microbial batteries (MBs). In step 1, electron donors are oxidized by microorganisms, releasing electrons to an intermediate solid-state electrode; in step 2, the solid-state electrode is regenerated by supplying a terminal electron acceptor. The key components are a microbial anode and a solid-state oxidant cathode. Organics are oxidized at the anode by the enzymatic activity of exoelectrogens. Atthe cathode, a solid-state oxidant is reduced. electrolyte at near-neutral pH. Diffusion of dissolved O2 into (e.g., carbohydrates and methane), releasing electrons that pass the anode compartment is also a problem, allowing formation through an external circuit to a cathode comprising (or con- of aerobic biomass and oxidation of organic matter without taining) a solid-state oxidant, such as silver oxide (Fig. 1, step 1). energy production. Finally, methane production is sometimes The cathode material becomes reduced. In the case of a silver- reported in the anode compartment (18). This represents yet an- oxide electrode, silver metal is produced. Step 1 is an energy ex- other energy loss and signals that methanogens are outcompeting traction process like that of the discharge process in batteries. In exoelectrogens for the available electrons. Building on previous step 2, the cathode is removed and oxidized by exposure to a ter- MFC studies, this work introduces a previously undescribed minal electron acceptor, such as oxygen, water, or carbon dioxide, microbial electrochemical device for energy recovery where the under conditions favorable for its oxidation (Fig. 1, step 2). The key difference is the use of a solid-state cathode to replace the oxidized electrode is then reinstalled—a step that differs only oxygen gas cathode of a MFC. Operation of the anode is like that slightly from the normal process used to recharge batteries—and of a MFC anode, but operation of the cathode is like that of — a rechargeable battery. We therefore refer to this device as the process is repeated. The major drawbacks of MFCs voltage a microbial battery (MB). losses at oxygen cathodes and diffusion of oxygen into the anode compartment—are avoided by single-chamber operation without Results and Discussion the introduction of oxygen. Sustained operation of the MB system requires two steps. In A design challenge for the MB is identification of a stable step 1, microorganisms at the anode oxidize electron donors solid-state electrode with a suitable electrochemical potential. Fig. 2. Carbon cloth-supported silver-oxide cathode (A and B) and carbon cloth microbial anode (C and D).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us