Comprehensive Mobility Plan Surat 2046 SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION 22nd January, 2018 Presentation Structure . Part 1- Trends and Developments affecting Mobility in Surat . Part 2- Travel behavior of Surtis . Part 3 : System Performance . Part 4: Mobility challenges for future . Part 5: People’s expectations from the Plan . Part 6: Forecasts . Part 7: Proposals . Part 8: Institutional Setup . Part 9: Project Costing Page . 2 What is Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) ? . The Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India formulated the National Urban Transport Policy in April, 2006 . NUTP envisaged the preparation of Comprehensive Mobility plans. CMP is a strategic document which provides the direction for the development of urban transportation in the city. It cover all elements of urban transport under an integrated planning process. It is a long-term vision for desirable accessibility and mobility pattern for people and goods in the city to provide, safe, secure, efficient, reliable and seamless connectivity that supports and enhances economic, social and environmental sustainability. (Preparing a Comprehensive Mobility Plan(CMP)—A Toolkit, MoUD, 2014) CMP Surat - 30 years Horizon- 2046 Page . 3 Surat CMP- Study Area Delineation Administrative Boundaries: SMC comprises of : 326.52 Sq. km area 7 Zones 89 Wards SUDA comprises of : 985.16 sq km area 121 Villages 18 Urban area with SUDA and 2 outside SUDA 2 INA within SUDA (Sachin and Hazira) Total Study area 1351 sq km Comprises of 15 Urban Area 182 Villages 2 INA (Sachin and Hazira) Page . 4 PART I: Trends and Developments affecting Mobility in Surat Growth in Surat – Spatial and Population Built up area (sq km): Year 2001 - 2016 Out side Year SMC Study Area % Growth SMC 2001 85.8 67.2 153.0 2006 94.8 70.8 165.6 8% 2011 101.7 74.2 175.9 6% 2016 138.5 95.4 233.9 33% Source: Google Image interpretation Surat Urban Decadal Incrimental Population Agglomeration Growth Rate % Increase 1961 288,026 1971 63.75 204,975 Ahmedabad Urban Agglomeration 493,001 Decadal 1981 85.36 420,805 growth rate 913,806 Year Population % 1991 66.22 605,144 1,518,950 1981 2,550,000 2001 85.09 1,292,514 1991 3,310,000 30% 2,811,464 2001 4,520,000 37% Page . 6 2011Source: Census of India, Various Years63.3 1,773,903 2011 6,350,000 40% 4,585,367 Land Use Distribution in Surat Existing Land Use 2015 Employment Density Distribution 2016 Primary: 7% Secondary: 37% Tertiary: 55% Olpad Kamrej Katargam Railway Adajan Station Udhna Kadod ara Hazira Pandesar a Palsan Sachin a Total Employment 29.3 lakh Source: Development Plan 2035, SUDA Revised 2017 Source: Derived from Activity Survey, 2016 Page . 7 PART 2: Travel behavior of Surtis Data Collection - Primary Surveys Household (HH) surveys (15700 HH surveys) Activity/ Employment surveys Cordon CVC & Road Side Interviews (8 locations - 22000 (~10%) vehicles have been (3000 Non–residential properties within SMC) interviewed ) Terminal surveys 3 large terminals, 2 small terminals (4000 passengers interviewed) Speed and Delay surveys (Journey Speed on major corridors for PT, 2w, 3w and 4w Willingness to Shift 2000 samples (Pvt. Vehicle users, 3Wh users) CVC at screen line locations (27 locations ) Page . 9 Vehicular Registrations in Surat-1990 to 2017 Vehicle Registrations 3300000 3000000 2700000 2400000 2100000 1800000 2W 1500000 3W 1200000 4W Total Vehicles Total 900000 600000 total 300000 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Sept_2017 Year (RTO, Surat, 2017). Vehicles registered per day- 604 • Total Vehicles Registered in Surat till 2017 -29 Lakh 2W 481 • 16.7 Lakh Vehicles added in the last 10 Years. 4W 97 3W 3 Goods 5 If this trend continues the total vehicles will grow by 2.5 times (29 lakh to Bus 1 63 lakh) in 2046 (RTO, Surat, 2016). Page . 10 Travel Characteristics Vehicle Ownership Trip Rates and Trip Length CRRI - Average 296 Vehicles/1000 population CRRI - 1988 CMP 2016 2w Cars 2004 Area /1000 population /1000 population Per capita Trip Rate 1.02 1.31 1.6 Surat 273 23 Motorised Trip rate 0.6 0.8 0.9 Ahmedabad 215 35 Trip Length Average Trip Length - 3.54 - 5.01 Including Walk Mode Shares Average Trip Length - 5.6 5.6 6.04 CRRI 1988 CRRI 2004 CMP 2016 Excluding Walk Walk 45% 42% 41% Bicycle 19% 12% 2% 3Wh 7% 11% 10% Bus+Rail 6% 2% 1% 2W 21% 28% 36% Average Trip Length- 5.01 km 4Wh 1% 3% 2% Average Trip Length Motorised- 6.04 km 0% 0.30% 9% Others Average Trip time: 18 minutes Source : Household survey, CEPT university 2016 Page . 11 Avg. travel time by motorised mode: 13.5 minutes Avg. Trip Length of the city(km) Work TripLengths 11.0 13.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 Mumbai-(183 L) Delhi-(163 L) Bangalore-(84 L) Hyderabad-(67 L) Ahmedabad-(55 L) Chennai-(46 L, City) Kolkata-(45 L, City) Surat-(45 L) – Pune-(31 L) Top 35 Indian Cities Jaipur-(30 L) Lucknow-(28 L) Kanpur-(27 L) Surat Trip Length: 5.5km Length: Trip Surat Page Page Nagpur-(24 L) . Indore-(19 L) 12 Bhopal-(18 L) Visakhapatnam-(17 L) Patna-(17 L) Vadodara-(16 L) Gaziabad-(16.5 L) Ludhiana-(16.2 L) Agra-(15.8 L) Nashik-(14.8 L) Faridabad-(14 L) Meerut-(13 L) Rajkot-(12.9 L) Total Source: Source: Census 2011 Varanasi-(12 L) Srinagar-(11.8 L) Aurangabad-(11.7 L) Dhanbad-(16.2 L) Male Amritsar-(11.3 L) Allahabad-(11.1 L) Female – Ranchi-(10.7 L) Travel Diary Travel Gwalior-(10.7 L) Jabalpur-(10.5 L) Coimbatore-(10.5 L) PART 3: System Performance Centre of Excellence (CoE) in Urban Transport, CEPT University System Performance – Speed Avg. 2Wh Speed – 30 KMPH Avg. 3Wh Speed – 25 KMPH Avg. PT Speed – 20 KMPH 10:00 am to 11:00 pm Page . 1407:00 pm to 08:00 pm Travel Speed Comparison Travel Speed Comparison for 8 cities 30 (Within 10km from Railway Station) 25 20 15 Speed 10 5 0 9:00 AM 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM AM AM PM Time Ahmedabad Bangalore Chennai Delhi Hyderabad Jaipur Pune Surat Page . 15 15 System Performance- Congestion Level in Surat % of Higher order VCR Category Network >0.9 72 km (14%) >0.7 64 km (12%) <0.7 382 km (74%) Page . 16 System Performance- Accidents Accidents Year Minor Fatal* Serious* Total Accidents 2011 558 240 425 1223 2012 484 225 437 1146 2013 344 213 414 971 2014 324 246 406 976 Mode 2015 266 251 386 903 Affected Mode s 2016 NA 273 327 - Others(JC Accident GSRTC/ Gran Two Three Four Truck and B, Crain, with Street Level of Service -3 Pedestrian Bicycle Private d % Wheeler Wheeler Wheeler Eicher SMC Element/B Bus Total Vehicles) reakdown As per Service Level Benchmarks in Urban Transport for Indian Cities- Round2, Centre of Excellence in Urban Transport, 2016 Two Wheeler 88 6 38 132 11% Three Wheeler 95 3 24 3 125 11% Affected Modes: Four Wheeler 90 10 79 7 4 190 16% City Bus 3 1 1 5 0% Pedestrian: 43%, Truck and Eicher 90 10 152 17 16 7 3 1 296 25% 2Wh: 40% Others(JCB, Crain, SMC 43 12 58 2 8 4 3 130 11% Vehicles) Accident with Street Responsible Modes: 72 42 10 5 2 131 11% Responsible Responsible Mode Element/Breakdown Trucks & Eicher: 25%, GSRTV/Private Bus 19 3 23 3 48 4% UnknownSource: Police Department, Surat82 2016 8 26 3 1 1 121 10% 4Wh : 16 % each Grand Total 510 53 473 77 39 16 9 0 1 1178 100% Page . 17 % 43% 4% 40% 7% 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 100% System Operations and Performance Pollution levels 2016 Emissions PM2.5 (Ton) Nox (Ton) CO (Ton) CO2 (Ton) Year 2007 0.38 1.14 6.63 256.87 Year 2016 1.36 3.84 26.67 1117.91 * Emissions from Passenger vehicles 30.00 26.67 1200 1117.91 Yr. 2007 Yr. 2007 Yr. 2016 25.00 1000 20.00 800 15.00 600 Tons/ Day Tons/ Tons/ Day Tons/ 10.00 6.63 400 256.87 5.00 3.84 200 0.38 1.36 1.14 0.00 0 PM2.5 (Ton) Nox (Ton) CO (Ton) CO2 (Ton) Emissions Emissions Transportation sectors accounts to about 1177 tonnes of Emissions every day Per capita Co2 emissions in Surat is 0.42 kg/day The Co2 emissions have increased by 4.4 times in the last 9 years Page . 18 Level of Service in Urban Transport Good Poor LoS ranges Focus areas 1 2 3 4 Public Transport Facilities ≤14 15-28 29-42 42-56 Financial Sustainability of PT ≤3 4 – 6 7 – 9 10-12 Pedestrian Infrastructure Facilities ≤4 5 – 8 9 – 12 13 - 16 Pedestrian Infrastructure Facilities (For hill Cities) * ≤8 9 – 16 17 – 24 25 – 32 Non-Motorized Transport Facilities ≤3 4 – 6 7 – 9 10-12 Application of ITS Facilities ≤5 6 – 10 11 – 15 16 - 20 Road Network Performance ≤7 8 – 14 15 – 21 22 - 28 Parking Management <2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 – 8 Road Safety ≤3 4 – 6 7 – 9 10-12 Environment ≤4 5 – 8 9-12 13 - 16 Integrated Land Use-Transport System ≤6 7 – 12 13 – 18 19 - 24 Intermediate Public Transport ≤3 4 – 6 7 – 9 10-12 Page . 19 System Operations and Performance- Overall Page .