Response of Fishes to Algae Reduction on Glovers Reef, Belize

Response of Fishes to Algae Reduction on Glovers Reef, Belize

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 206: 273–282, 2000 Published November 3 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Response of fishes to algae reduction on Glovers Reef, Belize T. R. McClanahan1,*, K. Bergman2, M. Huitric3, 4, M. McField5, T. Elfwing3, M. Nyström3, I. Nordemar3 1The Wildlife Conservation Society, PO Box 99470, Mombasa, Kenya 2Department of Zoology, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden 3Department of Systems Ecology, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden 4Beijer International Institute for Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Sweden 5Department of Marine Sciences, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA ABSTRACT: Many Caribbean coral reefs have experienced an increase in erect brown algae (species of Sargassum, Turbinaria and Lobophora) over the past 18 yr. We explored the effects of fleshy algal overgrowth on coral reef fishes by reducing erect algae by ~2.5 kg(wet) m–2 on 8 patch reefs (aver- age size ~1000 m2) whereby half were in a new no-fishing zone and half in an unrestricted fishing zone. Another 8 reefs were left as unmanipulated controls in the respective zones. Multivariate ordi- nation indicated that the algal removal had marginal effect on whole-fish assemblages but that effect was highly significant on the biomass of common herbivores. The reduction of erect algae resulted in a rapid increase in the abundance of the blue-headed wrasse Thalassoma bifasciatum (Labridae), in the biomass of the blue tang Acanthurus coeruleus (Acanthuridae), and in both the abundance and biomass of the spotlight parrotfish Sparisoma viride (Scaridae). Bite rates and intra- and inter-specific aggressive encounters were used as measures of resource quality, and we found that these measures increased for surgeonfishes and damselfishes after the algal reduction, particularly in the center of the patch reefs, where most erect algae was originally located. Increased accessibility, net production and palatability of the early successional turf algae on the manipulated reefs are likely to account for the increased numbers, biomass and feeding rates of the dominant herbivorous fishes. KEY WORDS: Acanthuridae · Algal-fish interactions · Brown algae · Herbivory · Labridae · Manage- ment interactions · Sargassum · Scaridae · Turbinaria Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION (Aronson et al. 1998) and of an important grazing sea urchin (Diadema antillarum) (Lessios 1988, Hughes et Coral reefs in the Caribbean have experienced a al. 1999), coral bleaching (Porter & Meier 1992, Glynn large-scale change in their ecology over the past 2 1993, Shulman & Robertson 1997, Winter et al. 1998), decades resulting in the loss of hard coral cover and cyclones (Woodley et al. 1981, Done 1992, Rogers 1993, reefs dominated by various forms of fleshy algae (Car- Mumby 1999), and increased fishing pressure (Koslow penter 1990, Hughes 1994, Connell 1997, Shulman & et al. 1988, Hughes 1994) and seawater nutrient con- Robertson 1997, McClanahan & Muthiga 1998, McCla- centrations (Cockey et al. 1996, LaPointe 1999). The nahan et al. 1999a). This ecological change has been consequences of this large-scale macroalgal over- associated with the disease-induced die-offs of corals growth for coral reef fishes have been poorly explored, apart from a study in the Watamu Marine National Park, a 25 yr-old unfished park in a Kenyan reef *E-mail: [email protected] lagoon, which found that increased abundances of her- © Inter-Research 2000 274 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206: 273–282, 2000 bivorous and invertebrate-eating fishes followed the were that macroalgae inhibit the feeding rates of her- experimental reduction of fleshy algae (McClanahan bivorous fishes, while invertebrate-feeders, such as et al. 1999b). The considerable age of the Watamu Park wrasses (Labridae), grunts (Haemulidae) and snappers assured sufficient time for the recovery of fishes from (Lutjanidae), would have variable or delayed re- fishing disturbances, and the response may differ in sponses (McClanahan et al. 1999b). The greater net areas more recently closed to fishing. The recovery of production and palatability of early successional turfs herbivore populations could help restore reefs domi- (Choat 1991, Steneck & Dethier 1994) was hypothe- nated by fleshy algae to coral domination. Therefore, sized to increase accessible algal resources, which in studies of the interaction between fishing, reduction of turn should lead to greater feeding rates and aggres- macroalgae, and time since initiation of management sion between ecologically similar individuals (Carpen- should be useful in planning restoration of reefs domi- ter & MacMillen 1976, Eakin 1987, van Rooij et al. nated by macroalgae. 1996a). This study was undertaken to determine if the Ecological interactions combined with fishing may generally positive response of fishes to the reduction of produce complex responses to ecological changes or algae in the Kenyan study is also applicable to the perturbations (Knowlton 1992, McClanahan 1995, 1999, Caribbean, where the largest recent increases in McClanahan et al. 1995). For example, increases in fleshy brown algae have been reported (Connell 1997). late successional macroalgae may increase the struc- tural refuge for small invertebrates (Duffy & Hay 1991, Wahl & Hay 1995, Stachowicz & Hay 1996), which METHODS could enhance resources for invertebrate-feeding fishes if fishing is not strongly influencing their popu- Study sites and management. Glovers Reef is a lations. Late successional algae may, however, have 260 km2 atoll located approximately 15 km east of the lower photosynthetic rates and net production, as well Belizean Barrier reef — the largest reef in the Atlantic as a reduced nutritive content and increased chemical (see Stoddart 1962, Wallace & Schafersmann 1977, defences, resulting in lower palatability than early suc- Gischler 1994 for further geologic descriptions). The cessional opportunistic turf algae (Littler & Littler 1980, atoll is an almost continuous reef, with 3 large tidal Birkeland et al. 1985, Steneck & Dethier 1994). Late channels and ~850 patch reefs within the lagoon. The successional algae could, therefore, reduce the benthic outer edge of the atoll drops into deep water (>500 m), production available to consumers directly (to herbivo- while the central lagoon seldom exceeds 20 m in rous) and indirectly (to invertebrate-consumers) (McCla- depth. Patch reefs, the focus of the study, occur in the nahan et al. 1999b). The immediate response of fishes lagoon and vary in size from ~25 to ~10 000 m2. The to a reduction in late successional algae is likely to be patch reefs are separated by sand and seagrass beds manifested first in herbivorous fishes, as these are most at a depth of 4 to 20 m, with the distance between likely to respond to an increase in their preferred turf the nearest-neighbor patch reef seldom exceeding algal food (Choat 1991, van Rooij et al. 1996a, Lawson 30 m. Patch reefs consist of massive coral species (the et al. 1999). The response may, however, depend on genera Montastrea, Diploria, Siderastrea, Porites) with the species’ feeding behavior and the morphology of occasional thickets of Agaricia agaricites and A. cervi- the feeding apparatus (Bellwood 1990, Bruggemann et cornis. Sea fans (Gorgonia ventalina), sea whips (gen- al. 1994b, Polunin et al. 1995). Therefore, the succes- era Eunicea, Plexaurella, Pseudoplexaura) and brown sional state of algae is likely to influence the distribu- algae (genera Lobophora, Dictyota, Turbinaria, Sar- tion and abundance of herbivorous species according gassum) are abundant on most patch reefs (McClana- to their feeding behavior (e.g. browsing, scraping, han & Muthiga 1998). excavating) (McClanahan et al. 1999b). Despite the remoteness of the atoll, fishing is prac- This study reports the results of an experiment ticed by a small number of residents and a larger num- whereby macroalgae were reduced on patch reefs ber of transient fishers. Fishers collect lobsters, in the lagoon of the remote Glovers Reef atoll (Belize, conches and finfishes using spear, hook and line. The Central America). These patch reefs have experienced Belizean Fisheries Department zoned the atoll into 4 a large increase in macroalgae over the past ~20 yr, fisheries management zones and began management particularly by late successional brown algae (Mc- in June 1996. The southern half of the atoll is divided Clanahan & Muthiga 1998). The southern end of this into 3 zones: ‘wilderness’, ‘conservation’ and ‘general atoll was closed to fishing in 1996. Our study focused use’ zones. The wilderness and conservation zones on the immediate response of fishes to the algal reduc- exclude all forms of fishing except by a small number tion with particular focus on the response of herbivo- (<10) of residents who can fish only for personal con- rous surgeon (Acanthuridae), damsel (Pomacentridae) sumption in the conservation zone. The general use and parrotfishes (Scaridae). Our working hypotheses zone allows the controlled continuation of existing McClanahan et al.: Fish response to algae reduction 275 fisheries practices. The fourth zone is a seasonal clo- search-sampling period of 5 min. During the total sure area of a grouper spawning ground on the north- 35 min sampling period, the investigator swam haphaz- east end of the atoll. ardly over each patch reef, and recorded the number of Experimental design and algal reduction logistics. species and individuals

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us