09/28/21 PR2440: International Relations Theory (2015-16) | Royal Holloway, University of London PR2440: International Relations Theory View Online (2015-16) Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). ‘Why is there No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction’ in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm012 Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2008). ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’ in International Studies Review. International Studies Review, 10(4), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00826.x Ahiakpor, J. C. W. (1985). ‘The Success and Failure of Dependency Theory: The Experience of Ghana’ in International Organization. International Organization, 39(3), 535–552. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706689 Amsden, A. H. (1979). ‘Taiwan’s Economic History: A Case of Etatisme and a Challenge to Dependency Theory’ in Modern China. Modern China, 5(3), 341–379. http://www.jstor.org/stable/188893 Appleton, J. (2007). ‘Measuring the Political Temperature’ in Spiked, Review of Books. http://www.spiked-online.com/review_of_books/article/3366#.VhvKgcJwbcs Archibugi, D. (2004). ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy and its Critics: A Review’ in European Journal of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10(3), 437–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104045543 Arrighi, G. (1999). ‘Globalization, State Sovereignty and the ’Endless” Accumulation of Capital" in States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy. In States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy. Routledge. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pack age_service_id=13404856560002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670 Ashley, R. K. (1988). ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’ in Millennium. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901 Ashley, R. K. (1995a). ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’ in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (pp. 240–253). Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pack age_service_id=13406041110002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670 Ashley, R. K. (1995b). ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’ in International Theory: 1/16 09/28/21 PR2440: International Relations Theory (2015-16) | Royal Holloway, University of London Positivism and Beyond. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (pp. 240–253). Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pack age_service_id=13406000500002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670 Barkawi, T. (1999). ‘The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization’ in European Journal of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 5(4), 403–434. http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/openurl/44ROY/44ROY_Services_page?ctx_ver=Z39.88-20 04&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2015-10-07T16:05:58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004& url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article- scopus&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The imperial peace: Democracy, force and globalization&rft.jtitle=European Journal of International Relations&rft.btitle=&rft.aulast=Barkawi&rft.auinit=T&rft.auinit1=&rft.auinitm=&rft.ausuff ix=&rft.au=Barkawi, Tarak&rft.aucorp=&rft.date=199912&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.part=&rft.quarter=&rf t.ssn=&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=403-434&rft.artnum=&rft.issn=1354066 1&rft.eissn=&rft.isbn=&rft.sici=&rft.coden=&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_id=info:oai/&rft.object_id =&svc_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:sch_svc&svc.any=yes&rft_dat=<scopus>2-s2.0-0033 474139</scopus>&rft.eisbn=&req.language=eng Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2002). ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’ in Millennium. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601 Barnett, J. (2000). ‘Destabilizing the Environment-Conflict Thesis’ in Review of International Studies. Review of International Studies, 26(2), 271–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097674 Bellamy, A. J. (2005a). International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pack age_service_id=13383312880002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670 Bellamy, A. J. (2005b). International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/e xternal/AbstractView/S9780191532702 Bieler, A., & Morton, A. (2004). ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’ in Capital and Class. Captial and Class, 82, 85–113. http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/openurl/44ROY/44ROY_Services_page?ctx_ver=Z39.88-20 04&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2015-10-12T12:56:41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004& url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article- gale_ofa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations.&rft.jtitle=Capital & Class&rft.btitle=&rft.aulast=&rft.auinit=&rft.auinit1=&rft.auinitm=&rft.ausuffix=&rft.au= Bieler, Andreas&rft.aucorp=&rft.date=20040322&rft.volume=&rft.issue=82&rft.part=&rft.quarte r=&rft.ssn=&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=&rft.pages=&rft.artnum=&rft.issn=0309-8168&rft.e issn=&rft.isbn=&rft.sici=&rft.coden=&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_id=info:oai/&rft.object_id=&svc_ 2/16 09/28/21 PR2440: International Relations Theory (2015-16) | Royal Holloway, University of London val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:sch_svc&svc.any=yes&rft_dat=<gale_ofa>114007421</gale _ofa>&rft.eisbn=&req.language=eng Bilgin, P. (2010). ‘Looking for ’the International‘ Beyond the West’ in Third World Quarterly. Third World Quarterly, 31(5), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2010.502696 Brincat, S. (2009). Reclaiming the Utopian Imaginary in IR Theory. Review of International Studies, 35(03), 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008663 Brown, C. (1994). ‘’Turtles All the Way Down': Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations’ in Millennium: Journal of International Studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230020901 Brown, C. (1995). ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ in Review of International Studies. Review of International Studies, 21(02), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619 Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. (2012). ‘Beyond State/Non-State Divides: Global Cities and the Governing of Climate Change’ in European Journal of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 18(4), 743–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111413308 Bull, H. (1971). ‘Order vs. Justice In International Society’ in Political Studies. Political Studies, 19(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x Bull, H. (1990). ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’ in Hugo Grotius and International Relations. In Hugo Grotius and International Relations (pp. 65–93). Clarendon. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pack age_service_id=13406000980002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670 Bull, H. (2012). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (4th ed). Columbia University Press. Burnham, P. (1994). ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’ in Review of International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy, 1(2), 221–231. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177100 Buzan, B. (2004a). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&pack age_service_id=13390685400002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670 Buzan, B. (2004b). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/e xternal/AbstractView/S9780511313776 3/16 09/28/21 PR2440: International Relations Theory (2015-16) | Royal Holloway, University of London Buzan, B., & Little, R. (1996). Reconceptualizing Anarchy: Structural Realism Meets World History. European Journal of International Relations, 2(4), 403–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002004001 Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001). Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium, 30(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401 Campbell, D. (1998). ‘MetaBosnia: Narratives of the Bosnian War’ in Review of International Studies. Review of International Studies, 24(2), 261–281. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097522 Carr, E. H. (1995). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939 (2nd ed). Papermac. Checkel, J. T. (1998). ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’ in World Politics.