Are the Anti-Charmed and Bottomed Pentaquarks Molecular Heptaquarks?

Are the Anti-Charmed and Bottomed Pentaquarks Molecular Heptaquarks?

Are the anti-charmed and bottomed pentaquarks molecular heptaquarks? P. Bicudo∗ Dep. F´ısica and CFIF, Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal I study the charmed uuddc¯ resonance D∗−p (3100) very recently discovered by the H1 collabo- ration at Hera. An anticharmed resonance was already predicted, in a recent publication mostly dedicated to the S=1 resonance Θ+(1540). To confirm these recent predictions, I apply the same standard quark model with a quark-antiquark annihilation constrained by chiral symmetry. I find ∗− ∗− that repulsion excludes the D p (3100) as a uuddc¯ s-wave pentaquark. I explore the D p (3100) as a heptaquark, equivalent to a N − π − D∗ linear molecule, with positive parity and total isospin I = 0. I find that the N − D repulsion is cancelled by the attraction existing in the N − π and π − D channels. In our framework this state is harder to bind than the Θ+ described by a k − π − N borromean bound-state, a lower binding energy is expected in agreement with the H1 observation. ∗ Multiquark molecules N − π − D, N − π − B and N − π − B are also predicted. I. INTRODUCTION with a binding energy of -60 MeV. In ref. [21] we also conclude suggesting the existence of similar anti-charmed uuddc¯ and anti-bottomed ex- In this paper I study the anti-charmed uuddc¯ reso- otic uudd¯b hadrons. The anti-charmed pentaquark was nance D∗−p (3100) (narrow hadron resonance of 3099 widely expected [22], and its properties will certainly con- MeV decaying into a D∗−p) very recently discovered tribute to clarify the nature of the pentaquarks. The by the H1 collaboration at HERA [1]. This extends to + state D∗−p (3100) may be similar to the Θ , with the an- flavour SU(4) the SU(3) anti-decuplet [2, 3, 4] which in- tiquarks ¯ replaced by ac ¯. In this case it is natural to con- cludes the recently discovered Θ+(1540) [5, 6, 7, 8, 9] + sider replacing the K meson by a D meson or by a D∗ me- and Ξ−−(1860) [10, 11, 12]. The Θ (1540), Ξ−−(1860) son, because the D∗ is also a narrow state. For instance and D∗−p(3100) are extremely exciting states, because in the new positive parity Ds mesons, [24] the K¯ D they may be the first exotic hadrons to be discovered, − and the K¯ D∗ multiquarks are respectively candidates with quantum numbers that cannot be interpreted as − to the scalar Ds(2320) and to the axial Ds(2460). The a quark and an anti-quark meson or as a three quark energy of the is D∗−p (3100) consistent with a D∗ π N baryon. Exotic multiquarks are expected since the early linear molecule with an energy of +15 MeV above− thresh-− works of Jaffe [13, 14, 15, 16], and the SU(3) exotic old. This case differs from the previous ones because here anti-decuplet was first predicted within the chiral soliton there is no negative binding energy. Nevertheless a sys- model [2, 3, 4]. Pentaquark structures have also been tem which energy is located slightly above threshold is studied in the lattice [17, 18, 19]. However the nature still a narrow state, and in this sense the D∗−p (3100) of these particles, their isospin, parity [20] and angular + remains in the same family of the Θ and of the Ξ−−. momentum, are yet to be determined. Moreover a natural theoretical motivation exists for We recently completed a work on the uudds¯ Θ+ [21] considering heptaquarks (or pentaquarks) and not just where we indicate that the Θ+ is probably a K π N p-wave pentaquarks (or baryons) in the exotic multiplet + molecule with binding energy of -30 MeV. In that− work− of the Θ . Supose that a given s-wave pentaquark hadron arXiv:hep-ph/0403295v1 30 Mar 2004 we first compute the masses of all the possible s-wave H is studied and one concludes that it is unstable. Nev- and p-wave uudds¯ pentaquarks, and we verify that these ertheless one may consider that a flavor singlet quark- pentaquarks are hundreds of MeV too heavy to explain antiquark pair uu¯ + dd¯ or ss¯ is created in the hadron H. + P + the Θ resonance, except for the I = 0, J =1/2 state. When the resulting heptaquark H′ remains bound, it is However in this channel we find a purely repulsive exotic a state with an opposite parity to the original H, where N K hard core s-wave interaction. This excludes, in our the reversed parity occurs due to the intrinsic parity of approach,− the Θ+ as a bare pentaquark uudds¯ state or as fermions and anti-fermions. In this sense the new hep- a tightly bound s-wave N K narrow resonance. We then taquark H′ can be regarded as the chiral partner of H. − add the π N, π K and N K interactions to study And, because H′ is expected to be aproximately stable, it the Θ+ as− a borromean− three body− s-wave boundstate of is naturally rearranged in a s-wave baryon in two s-wave a π, a N and a K [21, 25, 26], with positive parity [27] mesons. The mass of the heptaquark H′ is expected to and total isospin I = 0. In that paper, and in a very be slightly lower than the exact sum of these standard recent work [23], we also address the S= -2, Q = -2 state hadron masses due to the binding energy. This princi- + Ξ−−, discovered by the NA49 experiment with a mass of ple explains qualitatively the mass of the Θ [21] for the 1.862 GeV, indicating that this is a K¯ N K¯ molecule Ξ−− [23] and the masses of the non-exotic multiquarks − − of the Ds and Ds∗ familly [24]. In this paper I extend the techniques used in our first publications to the D∗−p (3100) and to the other simi- ∗Electronic address: [email protected] lar narrow resonances with an anti-charm or anti-bottom 2 quark. A standard Quark Model (QM) Hamiltonian is assumed, with a confining potential and a hyperfine term. Tp ✜ 1 ❭ ✚ 1 ❩ Moreover the Hamiltonian includes a quark-antiquark (a) ✜ ☛❄p ✄❈ p ✟❭ (b) ✚φ ☛❄p t ✄❈ p ✟φ❩ ✜ 2 ❈ ✄ ✻ ❭ ❩ A 2 ❈ ✄ ✻ A✚ φA φA ❩ ✚ annihilation term which is the result of spontaneous chi- ❭ ✡❄ ❈ ✄ ✠ ✜ ✏ ✡ ✄❈ ✠ ☛k k ✟✻ ❭ 3 ✄❈ ✜ T1P13 ✄ ❈ ral symmetry breaking. I start in this paper by reviewing ❭ ✡ ✠✜ h i = hEP14i = E× ✄ ❈ ψ ✚ 3 ✄ ❈ ❩ ✄ ❈ ✚φ ☛❄p p ✟φ❩ the QM, and the Resonating Group Method (RGM) [28] 4 ✄ ❈ ❩ B 4 ✻ B✚ ✚ ❩ ❩ ✡ ✠✚ which is adequate to study states where several quarks ✚φ ☛❄p p ✟φ❩ ❩ B 5 ✻ B✚ ✑ ❩ ✡ ✠✚ overlap. Using the RGM, I show that the corresponding ✜ 1 ❭ ✜ ☛❄p ❉ ☎ p ✟❭ exotic baryon-meson short range s-wave interaction is re- 1 ✜φ 2 ❉ ☎ ✻φ ❭ ✚ ❩ (d) A ✡ ✠A (c) ✚φ ☛❄p q ✄❈ p ✟φ❩ ❭ ☛❄ ❉ ☎ ✟ ✜ pulsive in exotic channels and attractive in the channels ❩ A 2 ✻ A✚ k k ✻ ❩ ❈ ✄ ✚ ❭❭ 3 ❉ ☎ ✜✜ ✡ ′ ✄❈ ✠ ✡ ❉❉ ☎☎ ✠ with quark-antiquark annihilation. The short range re- V (p−p ) hA15i = hV13P13i = ✄ ❈ ✄✄r′❈ r❈ pulsion contradicts the existence of narrow pentaquarks ✚ 3 ✄ ❈ ❩ ✚ 4 ✄✄A(p−p )❈❈ ❩ ✚φ ☛❄p′ q p′ ✟φ❩ ✚φ ☛❄p′ ✄✄ ❈❈ p′ ✟φ❩ ❩ B 4 ✻ B✚ ❩ B 5 ✄✄ ❈❈ ✻ B✚ with an anti-charm or anti-bottom quark. I proceed ❩ ✡ ✠✚ ❩ ✡ ✠✚ with the study of the linear molecules or heptaquarks D π N, D∗ π N, B π N and B∗ π N. In − − − − − − − − FIG. 1: Examples of RGM overlaps are depicted, in (a) the particular the total energy of these systems is discussed. norm overlap for the meson-baryon interaction, in (b) a ki- Finally I conclude interpreting the D∗−p (3100) and pre- netic overlap the meson-meson interaction, in (c) an interac- dicting related multiquarks. tion overlap the meson-meson interaction, in (d) the annihi- lation overlap for the meson-baryon interaction. II. FRAMEWORK and it must also be replaced by Vhyp MD∗ DK h Di ≃ − Our Hamiltonian is the standard QM Hamiltonian, . The quark-antiquark annihilation potential Ai¯j is also constrained when the quark model produces spontaneous H = Ti + Vij + Ai¯j (1) chiral symmetry breaking [33, 34]. The annihilation po- Xi Xi<j Xi¯j tential A is present in the π Salpeter equation, + + where each quark or antiquark has a kinetic energy Ti 2T + V A φ φ = Mπ (4) with a constituent quark mass, and the colour depen- A 2T + V φ− φ− − dent two-body interaction Vij includes the standard QM confining term and a hyperfine term, where the π is the only hadron with a large negative en- + ergy wave-function, φ− φ . In eq. (4) the annihilation 3 ≃ Vij = − ~λi ~λj Vconf (r)+ Vhyp(r)S~i S~j . (2) potential A cancels most of the kinetic energy and confin- 16 · h · i ing potential 2T +V . This is the reason why the pion has The QM of eq. (1) reproduces the meson and baryon a very small mass. From the hadron spectrum and using spectrum with quark and antiquark bound-states (from eq. (4) the matrix elements of the annihilation potential the heavy quarkonium to the light pion mass). The RGM are determined, was first applied by Ribeiro [29] to show that in exotic 2 N N scattering, the quark-quark potential together 2T + V S=0 (2MN M∆) h i ≃ 3 − with− the Pauli repulsion of quarks explains the N N − 2 hard core repulsion. Deus and Ribeiro [30] also showed A S=0 (2MN M∆) , (5) that, in non-exotic channels, the quark-antiquark anni- ⇒ h i ≃ −3 − hilation could produce a short core attraction.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us