Penicillins and Cephalosporins to Penicillinase of Staphylococcus Aureus

Penicillins and Cephalosporins to Penicillinase of Staphylococcus Aureus

J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.30.1.35 on 1 January 1977. Downloaded from J. clin. Path., 1977, 30, 35-39 Susceptibility of the 'penicillinase-resistant' penicillins and cephalosporins to penicillinase of Staphylococcus aureus R. W. LACEY AND ANNE STOKES From the Department of Bacteriology, North Cambridgeshire Hospital, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire SUMMARY The activities of some semisynthetic penicillins and cephalosporins have been tested against clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. The apparent activity in vitro varies with the method of testing used. Determination of MICs using light inocula fails to detect the destructive effect of penicillinase on the antibiotic. This was, however, demonstrated reproducibly by the use of a technique in which a heavy inoculum was pre-incubated for two hours before application of antibiotic to wells. This method of testing probably represents most of the clinical situations in which the drugs are used since both in vitro and in vivo a growing culture is exposed to an antibiotic gradient. Flucloxacillin was inactivated by penicillinase considerably more than either methicillin, cloxacil- lin, or nafcillin. Cephaloridine was the most vulnerable of the cephalosporins. Cephazolin, cepha- copyright. lothin, and cephalexin were intermediate. Cephradine was the least hydrolysed by staphylococcal penicillinase. It is recommended that the activities of all penicillins and cephalosporins against staphylococci should be tested by diffusion at 37°C with pre-incubation of the culture for two hours at this temperature. http://jcp.bmj.com/ Determination of minimum inhibitory concentra- These enzymes are released into the media with little tions (MIC) has become accepted as the ideal method residual protein adherent to the cell. In this category by which laboratories express antibiotic sensitivity the enzyme that is of paramount clinical importance and resistance. This method has the advantage that is the ,B-lactamase which, to varying degrees, most of the conditions of the test can be controlled hydrolyses all the penicillins and cephalosporins (see accurately and reproduced easily, so that different below). Although a large proportion of the fl-lacta- laboratories can, by reference to standard organisms mase synthesised by Gram-negative bacteria is still on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected and antibiotics, obtain confidence in the accuracy of cell-associated after subculture of the organism to their sensitivity testing. fresh media, the amount of lactamase retained by the In most clinical situations the MIC level obtained staphylococcal cell is small. Thus, MIC methodology in vitro is thought to correlate well with the outcome may fail to detect much ofthe effect ofstaphylococcal of antibacterial therapy in vivo. That laboratories do lactamase on penicillins and cephalosporins. not express routinely many results as MICs is an This phenomenon was well recognised in the 1940s indication of the length of time that this method and 1950s when resistance to benzyl penicillin in takes compared to diffusion methods. vitro was usually identified by diffusion testing, since There is probably, however, one serious drawback determination of MIC was thought to give a falsely in the use of MIC methods to report antibiotic optimistic view of the activity of this drug against sensitivity. Under certain conditions (particularly penicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. when a dilute inoculum is used) the assessment of However, with the arrival of the 'penicillinase- sensitivity obtained by MIC methods will fail to take resistant' penicillins and cephalosporins throughout into account the production of certain enzymes. the 1960s and 1970s, this shortcoming of MIC assessment has apparently been forgotten. The Received for publication 27 May 1976 activity of each new penicillin or cephalosporin has 35 J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.30.1.35 on 1 January 1977. Downloaded from 36 R. W. Lacey and Anne Stokes been assessed primarily by MICs. The possibility that incubated aerobically for 18 hours at 37°C and the the drug may be significantly hydrolysed by end point was taken as no visible growth. staphylococcal penicillinase has usually been dis- counted, at least in the promotional literature. DIFFUSION TESTING There is, however, mounting evidence, derived These experiments were performed using a standard both from the chemotherapy of experimentally surface seeding technique with a neat overnight induced infections in animals and from clinical culture in peptone water that was applied to the experience in man, that certain of these new 'penicil- surface ofplates containing DST agar (Oxoid). These linase-resistant' penicillins are indeed vulnerable to were drained for 10 minutes and then allowed to dry staphylococcal penicillinase in vivo. for a further 10 minutes. Solutions of antibiotics Thus, cephaloridine fares poorly in the treatment were applied in wells, 8 mm diameter, either im- of induced staphylococcal osteomyelitis in rabbits, mediately or after incubation of the seeded plates at probably because ofits destruction by staphylococcal 37°C for various intervals, usually two hours. The penicillinase (Norden and Dickens, 1973). Burgess diameters of the inhibition zones were measured after and Evans (1966) found that cephaloridine failed in incubation at 37°C for a further 18 hours. In general, the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis in eight replicas of each antibiotic solution for each seemingly adequate dose, again due to the production test organism were allocated randomly to the plates. of staphylococcal penicillinase. Relative antibiotic activities for each strain were We have found that flucloxacillin was unable to calculated by reference to a standard curve. This was eliminate penicillinase-producing staphylococci in obtained by measuring the inhibition zones resulting two patients (Lacey and Lewis, 1975, 1976). In each from various concentrations of each antibiotic and a instance detailed evidence was presented which 'standard' penicillinase-negative culture. This organ- indicated that the therapeutic failure was due to ism was used throughout. The reproducibility of the destruction of flucloxacillin in vivo by staphylococcal technique was established as follows. were for activity against penicillinase. Six antibiotics assessed copyright. A large number of authors have described an four different strains. The experiments were then 'inoculum effect' with cephaloridine, ie, the MIC for repeated 'blind' after randomising of strains, and the a particular strain rises with increasing numbers of absolute activities were calculated on each occasion. bacteria in the inoculum. We have found that such an The standard error between the two sets of results effect occurs only with penicillinase-producing was 30%. strains. Controls included the checking of the variation in These observations suggest that both cephalo- the surface seeding, examination for possible ridine and flucloxacillin are significantly inactivated differences in the growth rate of the inoculum oncehttp://jcp.bmj.com/ in vivo by staphylococcal penicillinase. applied to the plate, and measurement of inhibition The purpose of this paper is to identify the condi- zones obtained with other antibiotics, including tions in vitro under which this inactivation occurs, tetracycline and gentamicin. It was concluded that and to assess which of the penicillins and cephalo- variations in zone size attained were unlikely to be sporins are likely to be least vulnerable to staphylo- due to factors other than variation in the ability of coccal penicillinase in vivo. the culture to produce penicillinase. Penicillinase was demonstrated both chemically (starch-iodine Material and methods method) and by the effect on benzyl penicillin in disc on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected testing. STRAINS Strains of Staph. aureus were isolated consecutively Results from lesions ofinpatients and outpatients at Wisbech and King's Lynn District Hospitals during 1975. In The MICs of 'single cell' inocula (ie, an inoculum of addition, three pairs of strains isolated in Bristol in about 50-200 discrete colony-forming units when 1971 were investigated; the latter were constructed applied to the surface of antibiotic-free medium) are so that they were isogenic except for variation in their shown in Table 1. For each antibiotic the range of ability to produce penicillinase (see results). MIC was narrow among the 60 strains and was not affected by the ability of the culture to produce SENSITIVITY TESTING penicillinase. As many other workers have found, MICs were determined by inoculating dilutions of methicillin was the least potent of the penicillins. Of overnight peptone water (Oxoid) cultures on to the the cephalosporins, cephaloridine was the most surface of agar (Oxoid blood base No. 2) containing active and cephalexin and cephradine the least. appropriate levels of antibiotic. The plates were Since several reports have indicated that the MICs J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.30.1.35 on 1 January 1977. Downloaded from Susceptibility ofthe 'penicillinase-resistant'penicillins and cephalosporins to penicillinase ofStaph. aureus 37 Table 1 MICs ( Fg/ml) ofpenicillins and cephalosporin clinical situation in which an antibiotic is admin- for penicillinase-positive andpenicillinase-negative strains istered to a patient with a developing bacterial ofStaph. aureus infection. Pre-incubation beyond two hours gave more marked differences

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us