Caught Burbot to Estimate Population Rate Functions

Caught Burbot to Estimate Population Rate Functions

North American Journal of Fisheries Management 38:346–354, 2018 © 2018 American Fisheries Society ISSN: 0275-5947 print / 1548-8675 online DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10031 MANAGEMENT BRIEF Efficacy of Using Data from Angler-Caught Burbot to Estimate Population Rate Functions Tucker A. Brauer* Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Mail Stop 1141, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA Darren T. Rhea Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 432 East Mill Street, Pinedale, Wyoming 82941, USA John D. Walrath Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 351 Astle Avenue, Green River, Wyoming 82935, USA Michael C. Quist U.S. Geological Survey, Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish and Wildlife Sciences, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, Mail Stop 1141, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA regardless of data source. Results of this study suggest that angler- Abstract supplied data are useful for monitoring Burbot population dynam- The effective management of a fish population depends on the ics in Wyoming and may be an option to efficiently monitor other collection of accurate demographic data from that population. fish populations in North America. Since demographic data are often expensive and difficult to obtain, developing cost-effective and efficient collection methods is a high priority. This research evaluates the efficacy of using angler-sup- Population demographic data are the basis of fisheries Lota lota plied data to monitor a nonnative population of Burbot . management as they provide insight into the recruitment Age and growth estimates were compared between Burbot col- fi lected by anglers and those collected in trammel nets from two dynamics, trophic interactions, and growth of sh popula- Wyoming reservoirs. Collection methods produced different length- tions (Allen and Hightower 2010; Quist et al. 2012). Accu- frequency distributions, but no difference was observed in age-fre- rate data on fish population dynamics are important for quency distributions. Mean back-calculated lengths at age revealed monitoring sport fish populations and are especially criti- that netted Burbot grew faster than angled Burbot in Fontenelle cal for monitoring introduced fish populations prior to Reservoir. In contrast, angled Burbot grew slightly faster than net- ted Burbot in Flaming Gorge Reservoir. Von Bertalanffy growth and in response to removal efforts (Cambray 2003; Sim- models differed between collection methods, but differences in berloff 2003). Because collecting demographic data is parameter estimates were minor. Estimates of total annual mortal- expensive and time consuming, developing cost-effective ity (A) of Burbot in Fontenelle Reservoir were comparable between techniques is a high priority. A potential cost-effective A = fi angled ( 35.4%) and netted sh (33.9%); similar results were technique to monitor populations is to use information observed in Flaming Gorge Reservoir for angled (29.3%) and net- fi ted fish (30.5%). Beverton–Holt yield-per-recruit models were fit from sh caught by anglers. using data from both collection methods. Estimated yield differed Management agencies often employ anglers to gather by less than 15% between data sources and reservoir. Spawning data on fish populations and to monitor angler effort and potential ratios indicated that an exploitation rate of 20% would harvest (Willis and Hartmann 1986; Dolman 1991; Cooke be required to induce recruitment overfishing in either reservoir, *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received August 30, 2017; accepted December 10, 2017 346 MANAGEMENT BRIEF 347 et al. 2000; Park 2007). Angler-catch data provide an reduce Burbot numbers and have resulted in the removal alternative to fishery-independent data (e.g., standard pop- of approximately 34,000 Burbot since tournaments began ulation surveys) used by natural resource agencies. For in 2010 (J. D. Walrath, unpublished data). In addition to example, Travnichek and Clemons (2001) used long-term their effectiveness as a removal tool, angling tournaments data from fishing tournaments to evaluate changes in Flat- provide fish that can be used to evaluate and monitor Bur- head Catfish Pylodictis olivaris populations after the clo- bot age structure and growth. sure of the commercial harvest in the Missouri River. Age and growth data are of utmost importance to fish- Ebbers (1987) found that age-frequency distributions, ery managers. Age-structure data provide insight into the growth rates, and mortality rates estimated for Large- mortality rates and recruitment dynamics of fish popula- mouth Bass Micropterus salmoides in Minnesota lakes tions. Growth data are especially important because were similar between angler-supplied data and electrofish- growth has direct and indirect effects on recruitment, mor- ing surveys. In contrast, a number of studies suggest that tality, maturity, and length structure of a population fishery-dependent data should be used with caution. (Quist et al. 2012). Given the importance of age and Gabelhouse and Willis (1986) concluded that biases growth data, new sampling methods should be assessed to related to angling technique (e.g., gear size and type) and evaluate concordance with standardized sampling meth- season limited the use of data from Largemouth Bass ods. This study was conducted to compare age and tournaments in Kansas. Similarly, Miranda et al. (1987) growth estimates of Burbot from fishery-dependent (i.e., found that angler-catch data tended to overestimate angler-caught) and fishery-independent (i.e., standard Largemouth Bass growth rates compared with data col- trammel netting survey) data sources in two Wyoming lected using standard survey methods (i.e., electrofishing, reservoirs. Given the results of previous studies addressing cove rotenone). Substantial length bias in angler-supplied this topic, we hypothesized that fishery-dependent data data has also been reported in crappies Poxomis spp. would overestimate growth compared with estimates from (Miranda and Dorr 2000) and Northern Pike Esox lucius fishery-independent data sources, and that population (Arlinghaus et al. 2008) populations. The majority of stud- models fit to both data types would differ substantially in ies that have investigated the use of angler-catch data have their results. focused on popular sport fishes. Although less common, anglers that target introduced species have the potential to provide valuable information at a fraction of the cost of METHODS standard monitoring regimes. Angling tournaments target- Study area.— This research took place on Fontenelle ing illegally introduced Burbot Lota lota in the Green and Flaming Gorge reservoirs, both of which are located River basin of Wyoming provide an excellent opportunity in the Green River basin, Wyoming. Fontenelle Reservoir to evaluate whether data from angling can be used to is an artificial impoundment of the Green River located in monitor fish populations. Lincoln County. The reservoir is primarily used for flood Burbot are top predators, aggregate spawners, and protection with a secondary use of hydroelectric power occupy a diversity of lotic and lentic habitats (Hewson generation. At capacity, the reservoir has a surface area of 1955; McPhail and Paragamian 2000). Throughout their approximately 3,200 ha and a maximum depth of approx- native distribution in Wyoming, Burbot populations are in imately 30 m. Flaming Gorge Reservoir is located 125 km decline or have been extirpated (Krueger and Hubert downstream from Fontenelle Reservoir and is primarily 1997; Hubert et al. 2008; Stapanian et al. 2010). Despite located in Sweetwater County, Wyoming, with the south- poor status in their native distribution, a population estab- ernmost portion of the reservoir located in Daggett lished through illegal introduction is thriving in the Green County, Utah (Figure 1). As such, the Flaming Gorge River basin. The presence of Burbot in the Green River Reservoir fishery is managed by both the WGFD and the system is a concern due to their potential negative effects Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. The reservoir is pri- on socially and economically important fishes (Gardunio marily used for hydroelectric power generation. At capac- et al. 2011). In response, the Wyoming Game and Fish ity, the reservoir has a surface area of approximately Department (WGFD) has implemented regulations in the 17,000 ha and a maximum depth of 133 m. Green River basin that are designed to maximize fishing Data collection.— Tournament data were collected from mortality (WGFD 2010). The WGFD is also investigating Fontenelle and Flaming Gorge reservoirs during January the efficacy of suppression programs (Klein et al. 2015a, 2016 and 2017. Data were collected from one tournament 2015b, 2016). Anglers have become interested in partici- on Fontenelle Reservoir and two tournaments on Flaming pating in suppression efforts and have organized multiple Gorge Reservoir. The tournament on Fontenelle Reservoir ice-fishing tournaments for Burbot on Fontenelle and occurred over one night, whereas tournaments on Flaming Flaming Gorge reservoirs, the two primary reservoirs in Gorge Reservoir each spanned two nights. Tournaments the system. Tournaments were organized as a means to offered cash prizes for the largest Burbot, smallest Burbot, 348 BRAUER ET AL. counted, and TL (mm) and weight (g) were measured. Sex was determined by visual observation of the gonads. Ovar- ies were removed from up to five mature female Burbot per 5-cm

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us