Baseline study of the ArcheoDanube project Prepared within the project “Archaeological Park in urban areas as a tool for Local Sustainable Development” co-financed within the Interreg Danube Transnational Programme Edited by Katharina Zanier and Rok Ratej from the Institute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia on the basis of the contributions of the ArcheoDanube project partners: Michael Anranter, Szilvia Bíró, Andrea Csapláros, Jasmina Davidović, Nejc Dolinar, Karin Drda-Kühn, Dumitrita Efremov, Lenka Křížková, Andrea Manzin, Sergiu Musteata, Nikolay Nenov, Rok Ratej, Gabriel Rustoiu, Azra Sarić, Maria-Elena Seemann, Zsolt Simon, Thomas Stollenwerk, Simeon Stoyanov, Radek Široký, Iskren Velikov, Katharina Zanier November 2020 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) Index Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 International conventions ..................................................................................................... 5 European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage (revised) or “Valletta Convention” ........................................................................................................ 8 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 11 Charters and other doctrinal documents ............................................................................ 12 Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage or “Lausanne Charter” .......................................................................................................................... 12 ICOMOS Charter on the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites or “Ename Charter” ............................................................................................................. 14 Menorca Statement on the Development and Use of Best Practices in the Management of Archaeological World Heritage Sites .......................................................................... 16 Draft Recommendations of the First International Conference of ICOMOS on Archaeological Parks and Sites or “Salalah Recommendations” .................................... 17 Salalah Guidelines for the Management of Public Archaeological Sites or “Salalah guidelines” ...................................................................................................................... 20 International Principles of Virtual Archaeology or “Seville principles” ............................. 22 Charter of the International Association of Archaeological Open-Air Museums or “EXARC Charter” ............................................................................................................ 24 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 25 European strategies ........................................................................................................... 26 European projects .............................................................................................................. 28 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 35 National projects ................................................................................................................ 36 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 44 Research papers and publications ..................................................................................... 45 Management of the archaeological site/park .................................................................. 45 Communication on the archaeological site ..................................................................... 48 Communication outside the archaeological site.............................................................. 50 Accessibility of cultural heritage for persons with special needs..................................... 51 Reconstructions or no reconstructions ........................................................................... 51 3D-reconstructions ......................................................................................................... 53 Other selected research papers and publications........................................................... 54 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 55 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) National legislation ............................................................................................................. 56 Austria ............................................................................................................................ 56 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................ 58 Bulgaria .......................................................................................................................... 59 Croatia ............................................................................................................................ 65 Czech Republic .............................................................................................................. 67 Germany ......................................................................................................................... 70 Hungary .......................................................................................................................... 71 Moldova .......................................................................................................................... 77 Romania ......................................................................................................................... 81 Serbia ............................................................................................................................. 84 Slovenia .......................................................................................................................... 84 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 90 National strategies ............................................................................................................. 91 Country related survey ....................................................................................................... 93 Austria ............................................................................................................................ 94 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................ 95 Bulgaria .......................................................................................................................... 95 Croatia ............................................................................................................................ 96 Czech Republic .............................................................................................................. 97 Germany (region of Baden-Württemberg) ...................................................................... 98 Hungary .......................................................................................................................... 98 Moldova .......................................................................................................................... 99 Romania ......................................................................................................................... 99 Serbia ........................................................................................................................... 100 Slovenia ........................................................................................................................ 100 Partners inputs on features that should define an archaeological park ........................ 101 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 102 Regional and local legislation .......................................................................................... 104 Austria, Vienna ............................................................................................................. 104 Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo .............................................................................. 104 Germany, Baden-Württemberg ..................................................................................... 105 Moldova, Chisinau ........................................................................................................ 105 Slovenia, Ptuj................................................................................................................ 106 Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA, ENI) Summary ...................................................................................................................... 106 Regional and local strategies ........................................................................................... 107 Austria, Vienna