PROLINE-CE WORKPACKAGE T1, ACTIVITY T1.2 D.T1.2.2 Transnational best management practice report November 2017 Lead Institution HGI-CGS Contributor/s Josip Terzić, Ivana Boljat, Matko Patekar, Ivona Baniček, Daria Čupić Lead Author/s Jasmina Lukač Reberski Date last release 11. 2017 Contributors, name and surname Institution Austria Elisabeth Gerhardt Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Roland Koeck Department of Forest- and Soil Sciences, Institute of Silviculture Hubert Siegel Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management; Forest Department Christian Reszler JR-AquaConSol, Joanneum Research company Gerhard Kuschnig Municipality of the City of Vienna, MA 31 – Vienna Water Croatia Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Hydrogeology and Josip Terzić Engineering Geology Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Hydrogeology and Ivana Boljat Engineering Geology Matko Patekar Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Jasmina Lukač Reberski Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Tihomir Frangen Croatian Geological Survey, Department of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology Daria Čupić Croatian Waters Germany Daniel Bittner Technical University of Munich; Chair of Hydrology and River Basin Management Technical University of Munich; Chair of Hydrology and River Gabriele Chiogna Basin Management Technical University of Munich; Chair of Hydrology and River Markus Disse Basin Management Hungary Robert Hegyi General Directorate of Water Management Magdolna Ambrus General Directorate of Water Management Peter Molnar General Directorate of Water Management Tamas Belovai General Directorate of Water Management Barbara Bezegh Herman Otto Institute Non-profit Ltd. Matyas Prommer Herman Otto Institute Non-profit Ltd. Mihaly Vegh Herman Otto Institute Non-profit Ltd. 1 Contributors, name and surname Institution Italy Cinzia Alessandrini ARPAE Emilia Romagna Daniele Cristofori ARPAE Emilia Romagna Andrea Critto CMCC Foundation Gisella Ferroni ARPAE Emilia Romagna Sergio Noce CMCC Foundation Silvano Pecora ARPAE Emilia Romagna Vuong Pham CMCC Foundation Guido Rianna CMCC Foundation Giuseppe Ricciardi ARPAE Emilia Romagna Anna Sperotto CMCC Foundation Silvia Torresan CMCC Foundation Poland Przemysław Gruszecki Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Norbert Jaźwiński Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Marcin Walczak Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Piotr Zimmermann Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Joanna Troińska Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Andrzej Kaczorek Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Edyta Jurkiewicz-Gruszecka Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Grzegorz Żero Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Olga Sadowska Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Anna Goszczyńska-Zając Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Michał Falandysz Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Katarzyna Dycht Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Sebastian Kmieciak Krajowy Zarząd Gospodarki Wodnej Joanna Czekaj Górnośląskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów S.A. Mirosława Skrzypczak Górnośląskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów S.A. Laura Lach Górnośląskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów S.A. Marek Czechowski Górnośląskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów S.A. Sabina Jakóbczyk - Karpierz University of Silesia Sławomir Sitek University of Silesia Andrzej Witkowski University of Silesia Jacek Różkowski University of Silesia Bartosz Łozowski University of Silesia Andrzej Woźnica University of Silesia 2 Contributors, name and surname Institution Slovenia Barbara Čenčur Curk University of Ljubljana, NTF Anja Torkar University of Ljubljana, NTF Mihael Brenčić University of Ljubljana, NTF Timotej Verbovšek University of Ljubljana, NTF Primož Banovec University of Ljubljana, FGG Ajda Cilenšek University of Ljubljana, FGG Branka Bračič Železnik Public Water Utility JP VO-KA 3 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Forests ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1. Forests in general ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Best management practices – Forests – Mountain sites (MF) ................................................................................. 6 2.3. Best management practices – Forests – Plain sites (PF) ........................................................................................ 36 2.4. Review of best management practices – Forests .................................................................................................. 47 3. Grassland ...........................................................................................................................................................49 3.1. Grassland in general .............................................................................................................................................. 49 3.2. Best management practices – Grassland – Mountain sites (MG) .......................................................................... 50 3.3. Best management practices – Grassland – Plain sites (PG) ................................................................................... 72 3.4. Review of best management practices - Grassland ............................................................................................... 78 4. Wetlands ...........................................................................................................................................................81 4.1. Wetlands in general ............................................................................................................................................... 81 4.2. Best management practices – Wetlands – Plain sites (PW) ................................................................................... 82 4.3. Review of best management practices – Wetlands ............................................................................................... 93 5. Agriculture .........................................................................................................................................................96 5.1. Agriculture in general ............................................................................................................................................ 96 5.2. Best management practices – Agriculture – Mountain sites (MA) ........................................................................ 98 5.3. Best management practices – Agriculture – Plain sites (PA) ............................................................................... 123 5.4. Review of best management practices – Agriculture .......................................................................................... 138 6. Special sites ..................................................................................................................................................... 141 6.1. Dry areas .............................................................................................................................................................. 141 6.2. Riparian strips ...................................................................................................................................................... 145 6.2.1. Riparian strips in general .................................................................................................................................. 145 6.3. Best management practices – Special sites – Riparian strips .............................................................................. 145 6.4. Review of best management practices – Special sites – Riparian strips .............................................................. 159 7. General Best practices ..................................................................................................................................... 160 7.1. Drinking water quality and quantity measures .................................................................................................... 160 7.2. Flood mitigation measures .................................................................................................................................. 172 7.3. Review of general best practices ......................................................................................................................... 186 8. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................................... 187 9. References ....................................................................................................................................................... 188 4 1. Introduction The purpose of D.T1.2.2 “Transnational best management practice report” is to provide an overview of best management practices in drinking water supply areas, regarding different types of land use covering regional and national level, furthermore enhanced with EU level. Transnational best management practice report is developed within the scope of activity A.T1.2 “Review of best management practices for drinking water supply issues”, and it will provide