I Departamento De Arquitectura Y Construcción Navales Escuela Técnica Superior De Ingenieros Navales Doctoral Thesis Fishing E

I Departamento De Arquitectura Y Construcción Navales Escuela Técnica Superior De Ingenieros Navales Doctoral Thesis Fishing E

DEPARTAMENTO DE ARQUITECTURA Y CONSTRUCCIÓN NAVALES ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS NAVALES DOCTORAL THESIS FISHING EFFORT CONTROL REGULATIONS INFLUENCE ON STABILITY, SAFETY AND OPERABILITY OF SMALL FISHING VESSELS: STUDY OF A SERIES OF STABILITY RELATED ACCIDENTS OCCURRED IN SPAIN BETWEEN 2004 AND 2007 AUTHOR Francisco Mata Álvarez-Santullano Ingeniero Naval por la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Máster universitario en Alta Dirección Pública por la Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo DIRECTOR Antonio Souto Iglesias Doctor Ingeniero Naval 2014 I II To mi wife / A mi mujer 2014/02/01 III IV Many persons have contributed in several ways to this thesis. While it is not possible to mention all of them, the author wishes to thank specially the following persons, for the valuable work, ideas and discussions contributing to this thesis: Professor Antonio Souto Iglesias, from the Technical University of Madrid Ander Lasa-Gallurralde, from LASANAVAL OTN Enrique Orero-Oms, from OREMAR S.A. Dr Gabriele Bulian, from the University of Trieste Professor Luis Pérez Rojas, from the Technical University of Madrid José L. Cercos-Pita, from the Technical University of Madrid Hugo Gee, from the Technical University of Madrid Clara Mata Álvarez-Santullano V VI CONTENTS CONTENTS................................................................................................................. VII LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ IX LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... XI GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................ XIII RESUMEN .................................................................................................................. XV ABSTACT ................................................................................................................ XVIII 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1. General ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Fishing effort ............................................................................................... 2 1.3. Influence of the tonnage limitation on stability ......................................... 4 1.4. Characteristics of the fishing sector in Spain ............................................. 5 1.5. Mortality of the fishing sector .................................................................. 10 1.6. Stability and safety ................................................................................... 14 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE THESIS .............................................................................. 21 2.1. Fishing effort control regulation influence on ship stability .................... 21 2.2. Regulatory stability criteria aptitude to assess the probability of capsizing 21 2.3. Assessment of stability in rough weather ................................................ 22 3. METHODOLOGY OF THE THESIS ...................................................................... 23 4. FLOODED FISHING VESSELS CASE STUDIES ...................................................... 25 4.1. General ..................................................................................................... 25 4.2. Vessels F1 (25057 – NUEVO PILIN) and P1 (16060 – LETICIA) .................. 29 4.3. Vessels F2 (24593 – ENRIQUE EL MORICO) and P2 (11830 – MARIA DOLORES) 31 4.4. Vessels F3 (24391 – O BAHIA) and P3 (5969 – AMEIXA) .......................... 33 4.5. Vessels F4 (24358 – SIEMPRE CASINA) and P4 (251 – SIEMPRE HERMANOS CASINA) ................................................................................................... 35 4.6. Vessels F5 (24199 – NUEVO PEPITA AURORA) and P1 (5154 – PEPITA LA AURORA) 37 VII 4.7. Comparison between lost vessels and predecessors ............................... 39 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE PERFORMED ANALISES ................................................. 41 5.1. General ..................................................................................................... 41 5.2. Fishing fleet accident rate assessment ..................................................... 41 5.3. Regulatory stability ................................................................................... 42 5.4. Seakeeping and operability ...................................................................... 44 5.5. Stability in rough weather ........................................................................ 48 6. RESULTS – ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 61 6.1. Fishing fleet accident rate assessment ..................................................... 61 6.2. Regulatory stability ................................................................................... 63 6.3. Operability ................................................................................................ 66 6.4. Stability in rough weather ........................................................................ 77 6.5. Joint Results analysis ................................................................................ 85 7. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................. 90 7.1. General ..................................................................................................... 90 7.2. Accident rate in the Spanish fishing fleet ................................................. 91 7.3. Fishing effort ............................................................................................. 91 7.4. Stability and operability ............................................................................ 91 7.5. Stability in rough weather – Weather criterion and SGISC ...................... 93 7.6. Future work .............................................................................................. 93 7.7. Final remarks: a reflection on ship safety and stability ............................ 94 8. THESIS PUBLICATIONS...................................................................................... 99 8.1. Refereed papers ....................................................................................... 99 8.2. Conference papers ................................................................................... 99 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................... 101 VIII LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Historical Spanish fishing fleet distribution, by length and fishing gear type (Source: SFFR) ................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2. Distribution of the current fishing fleet, as of May 2013, per length and fishing gear (Source: SFFR) ............................................................................................... 8 Figure 3. Mortality rates in Spain (Source: ILO) ....................................................... 11 Figure 4. Ratio of mortality rate in fishing sector to global mortality in all labor sectors in Spain, from 1999 to 2008 (Source: Author from ILO data) ............................ 12 Figure 5. Discrimination analysis diagram for parameter GZ30 (MSC.1/Circ.1281) . 17 Figure 6. Fishing vessels F1 (left) and P1 (right) (source: SFFR) ............................... 30 Figure 7. Fishing vessel F2 (source: SFFR) ................................................................ 32 Figure 8. Fishing vessels F3 (left) and P3 (right) (source: SFFR) ............................... 34 Figure 9. Fishing vessels F4 (left) and P4 (right) (source: SFFR) ............................... 36 Figure 10. Fishing vessels F5 (left) and P5 (right) (source: SFFR) ............................. 38 Figure 11. Graphical representation of the Weather Criterion................................ 49 Figure 12. Conceptual scheme of the assumed simplified physical modelling for the short-term assessment (source: IMO) ............................................................................ 51 Figure 13. Simplified effective wave slope function ................................................ 54 Figure 14. Effective wave slope function obtained from the Froude-Krylov roll moments calculated with PRECAL. Bretschneider wave spectrum with Hs=1.88 m, To= 8,8 s ................................................................................................................................. 55 Figure 15. Water on deck over a 4 m long section of the vessel, to estimate GZ loss ........................................................................................................................................ 57 Figure 16. Typical curves showing the GZ loss due to shipment of water on deck, depending on the amount of water and heeling angle .................................................. 57 Figure 17. Sunk vessels distribution in Spain (Source: author, from MAGRAMA and CIAIM data) ..................................................................................................................... 61 Figure 18. Cumulative distribution function of vessels sunk in Spain (Source: author, from MAGRAMA and CIAIM data) .................................................................................. 62

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    123 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us