Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics Williams College

Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics Williams College

Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics Elissa Watters, MA ’18, Guest Curator, with Kevin M. Murphy, Eugénie Prendergast Senior Curator of American and European Art Williams College Museum of Art Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics Elissa Watters, MA ’18, Guest Curator, with Kevin M. Murphy, Eugénie Prendergast Senior Curator of American and European Art Williams College Museum of Art Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics Director’s Preface This publication accompanies the exhibition Art, Five years in the making, this exhibition would not Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics, have been possible without the generous support of organized by and displayed at the Williams College innumerable individuals. We are grateful to Merrill Museum of Art in the summer of 2021. The exhibition Berman and Tom Strong for lending posters from puts graphic materials, particularly posters, from their personal collections, as well as to Jolie Simpson, the 1972 Munich Olympic Games in conversation assistant to Mr. Berman. We are also grateful to with graphic materials from earlier in the twentieth the three institutional lenders to the exhibition, century. In doing so, it traces both the visual aesthetic Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum, LA84 and the underlying ideology of the Olympic graphic Foundation, and Sterling and Francine Clark Art design to earlier avant-garde art and design while Institute Library, and all attendant staff, including also acknowledging the unique sociopolitical context Caitlin Condell, Associate Curator and Head of the of the years during which these materials were Department of Drawings, Prints and Graphic Design conceived. Although for many the most indelible at Cooper Hewitt, Karen Goddy, Manager, Collections memory of these Games is the terrorist attack that and Operations at LA84, and Karen Bucky, Collections occurred in the middle of the event, on September Access & Reference Librarian at the Clark. In addition, 5–6, 1972, numerous visual design materials intended we would like to thank the International Olympic to present the Federal Republic of Germany as Committee and United States Olympic Committee for a modern, happy, and inclusive nation predated their support. Finally, we are indebted to the entire the catastrophic attack during which eleven Israeli staff at the Williams College Museum of Art, including athletes and one German police officer were killed. Joellen Adae, Lisa Dorin, Rebecca Dravis, Diane This exhibition and publication bring attention to Hart, Kevin M. Murphy, Nina Pelaez, Brian Repetto, the complex interactions between art, politics, and Elizabeth Sandoval, Noah Smalls, Rachel Tassone, propaganda that underlay the Munich Games from and Christina Yang, as well as the security staff and the initial stages of planning in 1966. The exhibition many others. We also recognize Christopher Swift and is scheduled to coincide with this summer’s Olympic Teresa Waryjasz from the Williams College Office of Games in Tokyo, similarly delayed a year because of Communications, both of whom were instrumental the COVID-19 pandemic, and raises issues, themes, in the design and realization of this publication. and questions of continued relevance today, such as the role art can play in promoting particular This exhibition marks a unique moment in our agendas and identities—nationalist or otherwise. institutional history, as it heralds the reopening of the museum to the public after a pandemic closure The seeds of this project began in 2017 when the lasting more than a year. While terrorism, racism, guest curator, Elissa Watters, MA ’18, then an and injustice are still part of our national and global intern with Elizabeth Gallerani, Curator of Mellon realities, we again look to the ideals of the Games— Academic Programs, first saw several of the 1972 international cooperation, goodwill, and celebration Munich Olympic art posters when she pulled them of humanity’s physical achievements and triumphant out for a music class visit to the Rose Study Gallery spirit—as reasons for hope in this moment of new at the Williams College Museum of Art. Thanks beginnings. For this spirit of resilience and shared to a gift from Williams alumnus Lewis Scheffey, optimism for the museum moving forward, I am Class of 1946, the museum owns most of the thirty- grateful for the visionary leadership and support five art posters commissioned from international of Williams College President Maud Mandel and artists to advertise the Munich Games. Elissa first Provost Dukes Love, the dedication and diligence pursued research in a seminar paper for a class of the entire museum staff, and the unflagging with Jay Clarke, now Rothman Family Curator in support of WCMA friends around the world. the Department of Prints and Drawings at the Art Institute of Chicago. Later, with the encouragement of Marc Gotlieb, Halvorsen Director of the Williams College Graduate Program in the History of Art, Pamela Franks and the support of Lisa Dorin, Deputy Director of Class of 1956 Director Curatorial Affairs and Curator of Contemporary Art, and Kevin M. Murphy, Eugénie Prendergast Senior Curator of American and European Art, the idea developed into this exhibition and publication. Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics is a wonderful example of the generative relationship between the Grad Art program and the museum since the MA program’s inception five decades ago. 3 Art, Sport, and Propaganda: 1972 Munich Olympics Essay by Elissa Watters, MA ‘18 The official poster of the 1972 Summer Olympics, The design program of the Munich Games was which took place in Munich, Germany, from August intended to convey joyousness, openness, and 26 through September 11, 1972, presents the Games’ freedom, supporting the motto “Die heiteren Spiele” sleek, technologically advanced architecture in (The Happy Games). Moreover, it contributed to the abstracted artistic form (fig. 1).1 Composed of planes NOC’s aim of “creating a place of understanding, of purple, green, blue, and white, it depicts the 955- of genuine communication” between individuals, foot, concrete and steel Olympic Tower, which was, regardless of race, ethnicity, or nationality.5 These at the time, the tallest television and radio tower in utopian goals would, however, be shattered when Germany, rising above tent-like structures made of nine members of the Palestinian terrorist group Black a lightweight cable mesh. Members of the National September breached the walls of the Olympic Village Olympic Committee (NOC) believed that the bright and murdered eleven members of the Israeli team and color palette presented the Federal Republic of one German police officer on September 5–6, 1972. Germany (FRG, commonly known as West Germany) as a place of “peace and casual carefreeness.”2 The attack inevitably impacted the perception and legacy of the visual materials designed for Designed by Otl Aicher (1922–1991), a renowned the Games. However, the styles, standards, and German graphic designer appointed Visual Design objectives of these objects had been established Commissioner for the 1972 Munich Olympics, this several years earlier. The artistic skill and visual poster is just one example of the program of graphic power of the graphic materials and their context art and design that sought to instill “an image within a highly intentional, albeit somewhat utopian, of Germany in foreign countries” which would ideological framework is often forgotten. Abstract “help to eliminate or to correct bad memories, imagery, associated with Western conceptions reservations, mistrust and skepticism in regard to of modernism, internationalism, and democracy, Germans.”3 Specifically, the NOC hoped to overturn was especially important for the organizers, as its ongoing associations with the ideology of the roots lay in styles of avant-garde art and design Nazi regime. This agenda aligned with the efforts that had been condemned by the Nazis. An of Willy Brandt, Chancellor of the FRG from 1969 abstract aesthetic pervaded all visual aspects of to 1974, to strengthen the nation’s relationships the Games, including the architecture, uniforms, with the United States and Western European publications, sports and cultural posters, pictograms countries while also seeking reconciliation with and signage, and informational graphics.6 Eastern European countries through his Ostpolitik policy. A letter written in 1970 by Vice Chancellor The graphic design of the 1936 Berlin Games and Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs Walter demonstrates the realist-figurative imagery typical Scheel to West German embassies and consulates of Nazi propaganda, with which abstraction and other around the world demonstrates the perceived avant-garde artistic styles came to be juxtaposed opportunity and stakes of the Munich Games in and from which the 1972 organizers wanted to repositioning the FRG on the international stage: distance the Munich Games. The 1936 Games—the only occurrence of the Olympics in Germany prior More than ever before, the 1972 Summer to 1972—were politically tense. Several countries, Olympics in Munich and Kiel [where the sailing including the United States, had considered events took place] will attract the attention of the boycotting the event for fear that their participation world to the Federal Republic of Germany. We would signify an endorsement of the Third Reich, must be aware that other nations will be more despite the Berlin Olympic Committee’s promise to interested in and critical

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    40 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us