No Significant Mass Loss in the Glaciers of Astore Basin (North-Western Himalaya), Between 1999 and 2016

No Significant Mass Loss in the Glaciers of Astore Basin (North-Western Himalaya), Between 1999 and 2016

Journal of Glaciology (2019), 65(250) 270–278 doi: 10.1017/jog.2019.5 © The Author(s) 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No significant mass loss in the glaciers of Astore Basin (North-Western Himalaya), between 1999 and 2016 Sher MUHAMMAD,1,2,3,4 Lide TIAN,1,2,3,5 Marcus NÜSSER6 1Institute of International Rivers and Eco-security, Yunnan University, 650500 Kunming, China 2Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco–security, Kunming 650091, China 3Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environmental Change and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 4International Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal 5CAS Center of Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 6Department of Geography, South Asia Institute, Heidelberg University, Germany Correspondence: Sher Muhammad <[email protected]> ABSTRACT. Although glaciers in High Mountain Asia produce an enormous amount of water used by downstream populations, they remain poorly observed in the field. This study presents a geodetic mass balance of the glaciers in the Astore Basin (with differential GPS (dGPS) measurements on Harcho glacier) between 1999 and 2016. Changes near the terminus of Harcho glacier (below 3800 m a.s.l.) featured heterogeneous surface elevation changes, whereas the middle section shows the most negative changes. The surface elevation changes were positive above 4200 m a.s.l. The average − annual mass balance was −0.08 ± 0.07 m w.e. a 1 derived from a dGPS and DEM comparison whereas Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer DEM-based results show − a slightly positive, that is 0.03 ± 0.24 m w.e. a 1 in the same period. In contrast, the terminus indicates − a substantial retreat of ∼368 m (4.5 m a 1) between 1934 and 2016. The average mass balance of 19 glaciers (>2km2) covering ∼60% of the total glaciers in the Basin exhibit no net mass loss in the period of 2000−2016 and follow a pattern similar to adjacent Karakoram glaciers. KEYWORDS: glacier mass balance, glacier mapping, dGPS, remote sensing 1. INTRODUCTION and Tian, 2016), but recent in situ dGPS measurements The temperature rise over the past few decades (Stocker and (2014/15) are restricted to the ablation zone for the Sachen others, 2013) is alarming for glacial health globally including glacier of the Astore Basin (Muhammad and Tian, 2016). High Mountain Asia (HMA) (Bolch and others, 2012; Earlier studies investigated the Astore Valley during 1984, Gardelle and others, 2013). Accelerated warming could 1993, 1995−97, 2006 and 2010 but focused on the veloci- affect glacier mass balances at high altitudes and intensify ties, fluctuations, debris cover and mechanisms of rock glacier melting (Mountain Research Initiative, Elevation glacier formation (Shroder and others, 2000; Nüsser and Dependent Warming Working Group, 2015). Such changes Schmidt, 2017). Dynamics of the Chungphare glacier would impact future water availability; therefore, hydro- were studied for the years 1934, 1958, 1987 and 2010 logical and cryospheric projections require precise glacier using repeat photography and multi-temporal mapping mass-balance measurements (Lutz and others, 2016). (Nüsser and Schmidt, 2017). Hence, field-based glacier However, in situ glaciological studies remain insufficient mass-balance measurements are still lacking in the study due to the extreme topography and hazardous environment. region (Farhan and others, 2015; Muhammad and Tian, The valley glaciers in western Himalaya and Karakoram are 2016). mostly avalanche-fed, with no distinctive equilibrium line Available glacier observations indicate that Himalayan altitude (ELA) or accumulation zones (Hewitt, 2007, 2011). glaciers have experienced melting and retreat in recent These glaciers share similar morphologies and have exten- years (Kulkarni and Bahuguna, 2002; Fujita and Nuimura, sive debris coverage (Shroder and others, 2000), making it 2011; Gardner and others, 2013; Vijay and Braun, 2016; difficult to determine their mass balance using most Schmidt and Nüsser, 2017). Several studies have derived ground-based methods. glacier length and area changes to better understand their Direct measurements are vital for estimates of future water dynamics in response to climate change (Kulkarni and availability and food security (Kaser and others, 2006; others, 2011; Muhammad and others, 2013; Rankl and Immerzeel and others, 2013) but the only hydrological others, 2014; Khan and others, 2015), however, these mass-balance measurements in the northwestern changes represent an indirect and delayed response to Himalayan and Karakoram regions of the Indus Basin exist climate change, varying from years to decades (Pratap and for the Siachen glacier from 1986 to 1990 (Bhutiyani, others, 2016; Zhu and others, 2019). Geodetic mass 1999; Zaman and Liu, 2015). Field-based geodetic studies balance from surface elevation change data provides a using differential GPS (dGPS) and other instruments provide more direct assessment of climate-induced glacier changes consistent estimates of glacier health (Kaser and others, (Oerlemans, 2001; Bonanno and others, 2014). However, 2006; Cogley, 2009; Tian and others, 2014; Muhammad the temporal coverage of such studies using remote-sensing Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 26 Sep 2021 at 19:26:43, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. Muhammad and others: No significant mass loss in the glaciers of Astore Basin 271 data are mostly very limited (Gardelle and others, 2013; 3. DATA AND METHOD Rankl and others, 2014; Kääb and others, 2015; Bolch and We present mass-balance data for Harcho glacier and others, 2017) and have involved negligible ground valid- compare/validate these results with glaciers in the Astore ation. Although recent observations have extended the Basin (≥2km2 area), derived by Brun and others (2017), spatial coverage, detailed temporal coverage is missing for using ASTER DEM data from the same observation period. each region, and so only provide an overview of the large- The dGPS-based glacier surface elevation measurements scale regional mass balance (Brun and others, 2017). were performed from the glacier terminus upwards for a Furthermore, validation and comparison of such measure- length of 3.9 km, thereby capturing a majority of the total ments in the field are still lacking and strongly needed length (4.8 km) of the glacier. The thickness change for the (Kulkarni and Bahuguna, 2002; Bhambri and Bolch, 2009; rest of the glacier was extrapolated based on the gradient Muhammad and others, 2013; Kääb and others, 2015; of elevation change assuming surface elevation change as Khan and others, 2015). a function of altitude (Gardelle and others, 2012) to estimate Therefore, this study attempted to evaluate the current the mass balance of the entire glacier. The following sub- behaviour of glaciers in the north-western Himalaya in sections describe the methodology for processing satellite the field. A debris-covered valley glacier was selected images and DEM, dGPS survey of Harcho glacier, SRTM to represent the behaviour of regional glaciers since a penetration correction, mass-balance estimation and uncer- majority of them are debris-covered at lower elevations. tainty estimation. This study investigates Harcho glacier surface elevation changes over the past 17 years (1999−2016). We also use our results to validate the mass balance of observed 3.1. Satellite images and DEM 2 glaciers (with area ≥ 2km ) in the Astore Basin derived This study mainly utilizes SRTM 30-m non void-filled DEM by Brun and others (2017) using Advanced Spaceborne and dGPS data for the surface elevation change and mass- Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) balance estimates. The glacier boundary was derived from DEM. Furthermore, this work combined available histor- the Sentinel-2 image acquired on 28 October 2016 and pro- ical data from a 1934 topographical map with more vided by the Copernicus Programme (Copernicus). The 10 m recent photographs taken in 1994 and a high-resolution resolution of the Sentinel-2 data helped to precisely identify QuickBird image of 2016 to track terminus changes. glacier boundaries. The insignificant changes in the glacier- The study improves our understanding of the current ized area of the Astore Basin during the study period glacier mass-balance changes in the region providing (Farhan and others, 2015) was corroborated using the data on surface elevation change and mass balance. Sentinel-2 data that were appropriate for this purpose. Among the 16 bands, spectral bands 2–4 (visible) and band 8 (NIR) have 10-m spatial resolutions. The Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP) was used to process the 2. STUDY AREA Sentinel data, and the subsequent extraction of the glacier Astore Basin is in the extreme west of Himalaya and upper boundary was performed by manual digitization in ArcGIS Indus River Basin, located in the Nanga Parbat area in nor- using RGB-842. The glacier was also classified into debris- thern Pakistan. The catchment area of the Astore Basin is covered and debris-free ice using the same Sentinel-2 2 2 ∼3995 km , with glaciers covering ∼252 km (6.3% of image by manual

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us