Complaint for Injunctive Relief in City of Lancaster V NRC Filed in DC US

Complaint for Injunctive Relief in City of Lancaster V NRC Filed in DC US

, .. D . - .. ... .i.,.7. N , * ,.g ..=, **. ,ga s.. .. .:*v ....3~~. - s- <...ee...,,, ms .*y aa ..ama m ..v. a. es +. a, . e.w .* . e. a... a.v, 4 .;. ,. .; . ...._a....,.< c.a A..., a . .- R. 3. e,..., .e w. .. ..,,r b, l .s .es a......- . , .0. f. .....w....: .e . _ cse . i.0 _-..R.ww u d- ." CL RY C OS. ;S S 10.N , t Oe f e nir .. ..., . ....L.............._.._.;.. ~ , ..._m.-. , , , . , , . eCR. , . .. ine p l a i n t .< .a .ss are: (a) ~n e City c: 'ancaster, 1 e nsy.va .ia :=i:: pal :or;c ration -ith .:s princ;;al office located at .00 ';c r t h Oue Street, 'ancaster, i Fennsylvania, phone 717-397-3501; ' ( 2) .ne hty of e c m er Ausuvc.; , a Tannsylv:ni: :=ic . ; = li t y ' authority, .b.ose :ailin;; addrers is :/o O'.arles ? Merr, Esqui e, 33 2rth . , 3.,t.., <.e o. v,.ca.;. .. Ae Street, . sncaster, .c t=sy3vania,. v., pnene (c) A.lbe r 3. achlsen, Jr. , an adult individual no resides a: 0;7 , East Orange Street, La nc a s t e r , tennsylvania, 176',2, . no .e 7!7-39:-49a3 , 2 ~he defendant is the United States Wu: lear Regula: cry O:nission t .(hereafter 'iRC), an agency of :he United States Oavert=ent, 4:5 its head- uar:ers in Washington, DC, and .: s facilities for service of process a r.d , : papers located a 1717 R Street '4, '.;4 s hing :c a , DC. , | )~ Jurisdiction of this ac:icn is based upon- 3 , ! (a) Section 102 cf :'.e ::4:ional Envir: ..enta; ?clicy s:: (hereaf ter ''E?A), 4 2 U. S. C. 14322. (b) Section 12 o f :he A:c=1: Iner:y A:: of 1946, is t=enced, ;; ,f 1 74, a; . ! . 0. $2:01, Se :io . 201 :: Me Ener;;- teor 3r. i:atia. .- 5. 0. :!el, and *itle 13, ?te:S '. 9 , O', f 0 and !! cf : e -:de cf Te:ers. -3;ulatians; (c) 2 5 e. S. C. $1:31(a). Th s se: en is 'c:au; .: a;ains- an spc.c y :he United 2:a:es. t. ' 90e n80 9/' ' o-390 256 018 G . , .... , - - . .: - . .. .. i r. rt.- H ~._ -- - e 0 a:rt:: of Saicanta. 5 he muni;ipal pis.-:iffs are 3 .ars in: pe ra t or s f a cc:_ _ i: < pu:lic wa:e - drinking sys tem se rving in excess of 105,000 people :hr: -hou: .ancaster Osun:y, Pennsylvania. "S.e individus1 plaintif f is a user an; : ens;:er cf public drinking water provided by the 2cnicipal plainr* fis. The ,:unicipal miaintiffs' source of raw drinking sater to se rv e their cus:c=ers is the Susquehanna River. i 6. As a result of a nuclear a:ciden: be; inning on March 23, 1979, d e f endan: assumed operational control -f reactor No. O at the nuclear powered - / ,( , .- - J |" >1e::rt: genera: ion pla n: owned and operated by Me:ropoli:an Edison Cc:pany and - leneral Outlic .tilities Curporation and located 4: Three 3dle island, laupnin The NR0 is exercising par- Coun: , ?ennsylvania (herein referred to as 21I). i :icular centrol over all plans and operations concerning deconta=ina:1on of -he ' i rea::cr buildings and the disposal of was:ewater. ! 7. Shortly af ter the acciden: began, approxi=ately 400,000 gallons of j radioactive was:ewater from Cat: No. l'a industrial ste syste=, contacinated in the accident, was dumped in:o :he 3usquehanna Rive r eithout any prior ! . no: ice )! such iamping to the plaintiffs or :ne general public. Addi:ionally, there were significan: releases of radicactive.todine into the Susquehanna River i ' in the five we e ks after M. arch 18, 1979. J . i s- ', $. The accident is the worst commercial nuclear reactor accident in 0.5. 1 .; his tory. The reactor No. I containment building is too radioactive to enter, I | and approximately 950,000 gallens of radioactive wastewater are presently i centained in the reac tor No. 2 buildings a: 7t!. According to the NEC, about i ' 250,000 gallons of " intermediate level" contaminated wastewater are in the .- u s u . e.- a uxiliary building , a pproxi=ately '600,000 gallons of 'hign level * radioa :ive eastewater see an :he floor of the reac:ar con:aineen: builcir.g and approxi- a:a;y *00,^^;. gal;ons of "-igh level" radioactive waste-ater are i- the rea::or'4 -rinary coling systen. The la:.e <rs:e has canv leais snich are td;;ns be: ween 1, ^00 and 1,500 ;allens a day of a;hly ra cioac tive , paten:ia;.s . - 1. .- * : the was:cwater a; ready in :he*contain=en: building. e - , . ...:ely - ''l di. na rge s wa s :e-2 :e r i :o the Sust enanna Live r a: five f. 5 ? ziles upstreas of the rav r in:ake of the =unicipal plain:tif s' __ , urinking water filter plant. 3 j 10. Unit i radioactive was:ewater released or discharata fro: T'il sould j 1 Jflow downstream, perhaos with only slight nixiag with the river water, and I - - j - . water fil: ration plant and systes owned and operated f , enter and contaminate :he i 1 by the municipal plaintif f s , and thereby contasinate drinking water consumed , i il t Aby the individual plain:1ff. Such conta=1 nation woulu * eae ''- municipal i l incur substantial expenses to obtain replace:ent water and to I flaintiffsto- b:I 'dec ontasina t e , if po s s ible , the wa:er filtration plan: and syste=, and would .. !\ (**T ! fcause bodily injury by radiation to the individual plaintif f and other cus- . I a j > | I somers of municipal plaintiffs. i 7 4 11* The defendant has control cver the decentamina: ion process and :he l g groposed d=nping over a number of soc:hs of the 950,000 gallons of partially- --- V f r*,v e ag i } decontaminated wastewater into the Susquehanna River. gf j * .; y 11. So systes has ever been designed or installed tn decontaminate a com- 1:ser ial nuclear reactor under the condi: ions currently existing at *y. I . ' 1 d 13. In sid-April, 1979, without any opportanity for public co=nen: or . ireview, the defendant approved a plan to at:empt :o decontamina:e outside the t I ; auxiliary building and dumo the 150,000 gallons of radioac:ive sastesater )"now contained in the aaxiliary building. The defendant approved the purchase ..acd installation of an EPICOR Il decontamination system of shielded ion ' exchangers which has been ordered and is currently being installed outside the !"i 9 Such ion exchange involves the use sf, resins ;in_ .lon - - auxiliary building..- - - _- - . - ::.- .. cexchange cartridges through which the radioactive wastewater would be passed in d I jordertoremove radioactive ions in solution. The cartridges would become 4 lsaturs ted with highly radioac:ive ions and would have to be removed and replaced i ' frequently. plaintif f s believe tha t :he used car:rtdges will 'oe handled and . : stored in a sanner which will no: prevent the release of highly radioactive j ; waste or resin into the Susquehanna Rive r. The defendants in:end to begin i l i.du= ping wa s tewater trea t ed by E?!OOR II in early June , 1979. j i 14. The defendant has no t yet received or approved a plan to attempt | 1 . 9 i -3- . * -. - . .o.vos , . rs - a: ;ve - ne dec: taninat:an :f :ne 72,::s gal. ns . ; n.f- .ar . :he prisar" coolant system and the contain en: building. _ --1 : he u: ;rior :: ice to - 15 The defendan: intends to auth: ize J;: ping 1 or approval by the plaintiffs. - i - | 16. Plaintif f s have not had a eaningf ul opportunity to review or i i t 3o cc ment upon any deconta:ination plans and, in particular, the E?l00R II plan e * 4 wnich has already been approved. ! I . ' 17. During the course of the accident, a high percentage of the nuclear . J " i j f uel rods located in the reactor core were oxidized and da= aged. Sc=e e the j i k wastewater currently 12 the reactor buildings has been directly exposed to ; , ' i ] damaged cladding and fuel pellets. ' + i 13. The waste currently in the reactor buildings centains very high and i a a i potentially lethat amoun s of biologically significant radioactive isotopes, , i l including bu: not limited to plutonic =-238, strontien-90, cesic=-137, iodice- , i ! . < 121, tricium, and carbon-14. ! I 4 - 19. Due to the accident and the ' resul:ing levels of highly toxic radioac-| ' 2 ~ tivity, reactor building No. 2 has been sealed. i i s Lefendant 710 estimates that the level of radioactivity attributable: j 20. !!1 solely to the gases in :he c.atainment building is about /=100 per *= hour , a ;4 although. the appropriate monitor is reading about 8,500 res per hour. Oefe: dant i . # , has publicly stated that many plant instruments have been disabled by high | I radiaticn and flooding; 'urther, defendant VRC has admitted it vill not be ablel ! | co check these instruments until it is safe to enter the containment building.f I ^- ! ! . 21. : De f endant NRC's regulations set the maximum permissible-levels I 1 of radiation in unrestricted areas at 0.5 rem per year. ! 4 E ~. In addition to the gases in the building, there are other sources nff - radioactivity within the wastewater, which has not been sa= pled because it is 4 4 2nsafe to enter the containment building.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    80 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us