Meet the Press

Meet the Press

.11=111.°910PP'••••men- Xertiortal dleoacicading row-titan? AtelenZ MEET THE PRESS tc‘neoeica's Arc:44 WonA Fence oil e 214y gleofirmed kg LAWRENCE E. SPIVAK gted: DR. CHEDDI JAGAN Prime Minister of British Guiana Volume 5 SUNDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1961 Number 40 l i .../49e414 gIeetLi efi; g41;2 /era aotelf e06.51eA at ft iktirevi c90.9 Cig iannr31, g'6eef 94aiff;iy- /642 d, 10 cents per copy U I I 1,1),'111:Y. NIV -IV- ITY ()I- I) X.(1)- Al-P',11N, ii)0),', •e4)J,( JACK PERKINS, NBC Nees TED POSTON, The New York Post TAD SZULC, The New York Times 'LAWRENCE E. SPIVAK, Permanent Panel Member MEET THE PRESS -..470r4rft4y.-. NED BROOKS MR. BROOKS: This is Ned Brooks inviting you to MEET THE PRESS. Our guest today is Dr. Cheddi Jagan, the newly elected and first Prime Minister of British Guiana, gateway to South America. During his fight for power he became one of the hemisphere's most controversial figures. His recent election created inter- national interest, and it became the subject of heated discussion in the United States Senate. MR. SIP/AK: Mr. Prime Minister, in a speech he made in the U. S. Senate following your election, Senator Thomas Dodd of Connecticut, said this about your election : "What it means is that international Communism has suc- ceeded in establishing its first beachhead on the South Ameri- can continent." Since you are here for economic aid, it seems to me you would want to answer that question. Are you or are you not pro- Communist? DR. JAGAN: Well, Mr. Spivak, let me put it this way: There is a great deal of confusion about this whole question of British Permission is hereby granted to news media and Guiana. For instance, the impression over here is that we are magazines to reproduce in whole or in part. Credit moving off from a more or less democratic set up in British to NBC's MEET THE PRESS will be appreciated. Guiana into a dictatorial or Communist set up. I want to say that in British Guiana thus far we have had atic DR. JAGAN: Let inc put it this way. There is in my view it anything but a democr set up : What I am interested in is to on difference between politics and economics. In the political field set up a democratic reFime in British Guiana. I have said so my objective obviously is national independence for my country. several occasions. My party has taken the lead in seeing to it In the political field, I am wedded, dedicated to parliamentary that democratic rights—bill of rights—are written into our con- field I do not believe in capitalism. stitution. So that to Vitt my position very clearly, I would say democracy. In the econota ie that I believe, like most Americans, in the parliamentary system I do not believe that free enterprise, which may have been very sve wonderful for, say, the United States of America, will in present of democracy. We ha enshrined in our constitution a bill of rights which we expect to honor. All rights, four freedoms are day circumstances develop either my country or an under- n developed country in the world generally. preserved in this. Eve property rights are preserved in this. On the question of Corninumsin as _such tIn‘re is, as you know, a I feel that in countries such as this in the economic realm great deal of confusion as to definitions and so forth. All T can there must be perforce a great deal of planning, the government: . taking a bolder hold of the economy of the country so that they say is that, so far as I am concerned, the personal liberties of the Guianese people and democratic processes will not be sacrificed. can move forward. ve On the question of the Soviet bloc as such, there is a planned I am a Socialist. I belie in a planned economy, but I can assure you this will not take precedence over the liberties of my people. economy. In this sense I am interested in what is happening there as I am interested in what is happening everywhere. Even MR. SPIVAK: Do I understand then by what you are saying in this country economists now are concerned about this question that you are neither 1:1 Communist, nor pro-Communist, as we y today in relationship to the Soviet Union, of rate of growth, as you know. understand both word MR. SPIVAK: Do you believe there is freedom in the Soviet in relationship to Communist China? Is that correct? 1 told You what my beliefs are. T believe in the Union and in Communist China, which is the big issue? Do you parliamentaryDR. JAGAN: system of democracy and the methods which are believe there is freedom there, and do you say that you will have in your country essentially the same kind of freedom? adopted in democratic countries. MR. SPIVAK: You say you are a Socialist, and you have DR. JAGAN: All T can say I haven't been to China, I haven't Marxist. Will been to Russia, but the experts who have been there who have stated on a number of occasions that you are a you tell us in what fundamental way, for example, your Marxism said—for instance, you have this chap who is a writer on this sm of Communism? ouestion, an expert, apparently, who writes for the London differs from the Marxie Observer—I can't recall his name right now, but he has said in I hav been . a student of people like Professor Laski.DR. JAGAN:I have been greatly influenced by his. writings, and in his latest book that life in the Soviet Union is growing day by d on _several occasions that T believe in day better and better. The standards of living are improving, this sense I have sai list and as such, we are concerned. We want to know how this is done. Marxism. I am a Socia in the sense that 1 believe that the means of production should be in the hands of the State public MR. SPIVAK: I am talking about freedom, Mr. Prime Min- ownership of the means of production, exchange and distribu- ister. Do you believe that there is freedom of speech in the Soviet Union? Freedom of worship in the Soviet Union and free- tion, which will result i n greater distribution of wealth in favor of the poor and also will mean the participation of the people dom as we understand it in the Western democracies? Do you themselves in the whOle process of government in the admin- believe that? DR. JAGAN: Freedom of worship, as I am told, there is. In istration, in factories, in . other . levels of government. MR. SPIVAK: Mr. Prime Minister, you seem to be avoiding fact, I saw a picture when Nehru visited the Soviet Union which me of showed him visiting some of the outer regions a direct answer on so these questions. The Communists psist they are democrats also, that theirs MR. SPIVAK: You believe there is freedom of the press and of the Soviet Union ii is a real democracy. What we would like to get, and what is freedom of speech? r in this country to know, is DR. JAGAN: I can't say fully that there is freedom in the important, I think, fo the. people . way we understand it in the West. where you stand on seme of these issues, because you have been quoted as saying in smile of your speeches in the past, for ex- MR. SZULC: Mr. Prime Minister, now that British Guiana is ample, "My idea was to show the members of this Council that , pproaching: the point of independence, how do you visualize the y ? How in theory Socialism and Communism are the same." That is development of British Guiana socially and economicall y in terms why I ask you, where do you stand on this fundamental division do you plan to guide the development of your countr in the world today between Communism and western democracy? of general development—how do you visualize its relationship to 2 47. the inter-American system, to the United States, and how in panied by your view may the Cuban phenomenon—the presence of the economic independence." You have said that you are Cuban revolution so close to your shores—may or may not affect going to ask for independence as soon as possible—political inde- the economic and political development of British Guiana? pendence from England. DR. JAGAN: You have asked me quite a mouthful there. Is the economic position of Guiana such that political independ- However, I can say that my country is kept backward today be- ence there wouldn't be a mirage at this time? cause it has been dominated by colonialism, not only politically DR. JAGAN: Yes, I would say that because, as I said before, but also economically. Independence will give us the right to 80 percent of our economy is represented by two products and fashion our economy in the way I reel it should be done so that both of these industries are in foreign hands, which means a great the standard of living or the people can be raised. This means outflow of capital every year. Taken over a long-term period there going in for a balanced industrial and agricultimd development. may be a greater net outflow of capital compared with what is At the moment our economy rests on two products, sugar and coming in.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us