Ibis (2019) doi: 10.1111/ibi.12715 Short communication reproductive ability probably developed as a strategy for efficiently selecting appropriate partners before individ- ual quality could be evaluated (Pagani-Nunez~ & Senar 2014). Among avian species, these cues can take the Fluorescent ornamentation form of ornamented feathers (Andersson 1992), ritual- ized behaviours (DuVal 2007) or other highly devel- in the Rhinoceros Auklet oped features advertised during periods of reproductive Cerorhinca monocerata activity (Curio 2004). 1 2 Several members of the subfamily Fraterculinae BRADLEY P. WILKINSON * MICHAEL E. JOHNS (Alcidae; hereafter ‘Auks’) have developed distinctly & PETE WARZYBOK2 1 ornamented features grown during periods of reproduc- Department of Forestry and Environmental tive activity. Auks are small to medium-sized seabirds Conservation, South Carolina Cooperative Fish and distributed in cold waters of the northern hemisphere, Wildlife Research Unit, Clemson University, Clemson, and in some species both sexes can display oversized head SC 29634, USA 2 and neck plumes as well as conspicuously marked bill Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive, plates during the breeding season (Jones & Montgomerie Suite 11, Petaluma, CA 94953, USA 1992, Jones & Hunter 1999, Sorensen et al. 2010). These ornaments are thought to relate to individual quality but could also be used to identify mates in highly social species when congregating near burrows or interacting Avian species have developed a range of markers for with conspecifics; their precise function remains uncer- transmitting information, among them ornamented plu- tain in many cases (Seneviratne & Jones 2008). mage, behavioural patterns and conspicuous bill struc- In addition to conveying information through the visi- tures. Members of the marine subfamily Fraterculinae ble light spectrum, some bird species are also able to have some of the most visibly noticeable ornaments detect cues transmitted though ultraviolet (UV) light among seabirds, and some species have been recently (Chen et al. 1984). Indeed, recent investigations have found to possess fluorescent properties in seasonally found fluorescent properties in the bill plates of multiple acquired bill plates. We examined a member of this sub- auk species when exposed to ultraviolet light, namely the family, the Rhinoceros Auklet Cerorhinca monocerata, Crested Auklet Aethia cristatella (Wails et al. 2017) and for fluorescence in the upper and lower mandibles as Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica (Dunning et al. 2018). well as the namesake horn grown in preparation for Fluorescence occurs as a result of the absorption of elec- mate selection. Fluorescence was noted primarily in the tromagnetic radiation at a certain wavelength followed horn of adults, with greater variation present among by the re-emission of typically longer, lower energy individuals than between the sexes. wavelengths (Gruber & Sparks 2015). Often, this re-emission is highly visible to the naked eye as a bright, fl Keywords: fl glowing hue. While this uorescence is not universal bio uorescence, reproductive among the taxon, it seems likely that other members of signalling, seabird, ultraviolet light. this subfamily may possess traits for fluorescence, especially species with other conspicuous forms of ornamentation. To more fully understand the prevalence of bill fluo- Organisms exhibiting intersexual selection often display rescence within the Fraterculinae, we examined the external cues intended to influence mate selection (Berg- ornamental breeding structures of adult Rhinoceros Auk- lund et al. 1996). These features can act as markers of lets Cerorhinca monocerata under UV light. We hypothe- the reproductive status (Velando et al. 2001), underly- sized that the keratinous horn grown by adults in ing physiological condition (Loyau et al. 2005) or indi- preparation for mate selection would be a source of flu- vidual quality of potential mates (Hanssen et al. 2006). orescence given the role of auxiliary ornamental struc- Selecting a reproductive partner with traits showcasing tures elsewhere in the family and the prominence of this beneficial qualities should therefore lead to increased fit- feature in the species. Finally, we also investigated ness through an improved ability to raise offspring whether bill fluorescence differs between the sexes. (Andersson 1982). As monogamous species enter into a pair prior to the commencement of duties required to raise offspring successfully, external markers of METHODS Fieldwork was conducted on Southeast Farallon Island ° 0 ° 0 *Corresponding author. (37 42 N, 123 00 W), a rocky archipelago that contains Email: [email protected] an estimated breeding population of 4500 Rhinoceros Twitter: @Pelican_Paths Auklets (Warzybok et al. 2018). Birds were captured © 2019 British Ornithologists’ Union 2 B. P. Wilkinson et al. using a 30-mm nylon mist-net deployed at four locations models was fitted in R (R Core Team 2015) with the with high auklet burrow densities. Netting sessions were package betareg (Cribari-Neto & Zeileis 2010) and com- conducted at dusk when Rhinoceros Auklets were most pared using Akaike’s information criteria with sample active, over the course of nine nights during the chick size adjustments (AICc; Burnham & Anderson 2002). provisioning period from 17 June to 7 July 2018. A ran- The model with the lowest AICc was selected as the best dom sample of netted birds were photographed under fitting model. Normality and homogeneity of variance UV light with a 4-watt T5 fluorescent bulb (253 nm) were confirmed visually with a QQ-plot and a plot of the and a Canon 6D DSLR camera (40-mm focal length, residuals against the fitted values, respectively. ISO 8000, f4 at 1/3 s). The bill of each individual was framed in the centre, with the subject approximately 30 cm from the objective element of the camera lens. RESULTS Care was taken to ensure the eyes of auklets were cov- A total of 35 Rhinoceros Auklets were photographed, ered to avoid direct UV light exposure. Photographs with sample of 20 males and 15 females based on esti- were taken in near-complete darkness with no additional mates from the sexing LDA. All individuals showed light source other than the UV light present, either out- some degree of bill fluorescence under UV light; how- side post-nautical twilight or indoors in a dark room. A ever, the patterns of fluorescence in the three bill seg- series of three photos were taken for each individual. ments examined were highly variable across individuals Upon visual inspection of the photos, there existed no (Fig. 1). Fluorescence was most prominent in the horn, discernible differences in the pattern or extent of appar- with an average proportion (Æsd) of 0.66 (Æ0.13) for ent fluorescence between images in a series. Therefore, males and 0.61 (Æ0.21) for females (Fig. 2). The gape the image with the least amount of distortion from and posterior side of the nares in the upper mandible, ‘shutter shake’ given the slow shutter speed used was and the base of the lower mandible also exhibited some retained for analysis. In addition, morphometric mea- fluorescence; however, much of the upper and lower surements of bill depth, relaxed wing chord and mass mandibles did not fluoresce (Table S1). were recorded for sexing. We found no evidence for a sex-specific difference in Preliminary exposure to UV light revealed that fluores- the amount of bill fluorescence. Modelling the propor- cence occurred in the upper mandible, lower mandible tion of fluorescence as a linear relationship with bill seg- and, most notably, the horn. These regions of the bill ment alone received the most support of the models emitted a distinct blue/green hue corresponding to the tested (lowest AIC ; Table 1), confirming what is visu- emission of longer wavelength visible light when irradi- c ally apparent, that the highest amount of fluorescence ated with non-visible light in the UV spectrum. To quan- occurs in the horn. The addition of sex as a linear pre- tify the amount of fluorescence in each of these bill dictor increased the AIC value by 1, showing weak sup- segments, their total surface area and the total area of flu- c port for a possible difference in fluorescence by sex orescence (in pixels) were measured using the program probably driven by slightly higher fluorescence of the ImageJ2 (Rueden et al. 2017), without the filtering of any lower mandible in males than females (Table 1). There specific colour channels. The total area of fluorescence was no evidence of overdispersion in the top model was divided by the total surface area of each segment, (residual deviance = 6.79, residual df = 102), and providing a unitless measure of the proportion of bill fluo- assumptions of normality and equal variance were met. rescence across individuals. Variation in the proportion of fluorescence was summarized by segment and by sex. A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) incorporating DISCUSSION bill depth, wing chord and mass was used to assign sex to each individual. The utilized function was molecu- Here we provide the first evidence of fluorescence prop- larly validated for this population using blood samples erties of another Fraterculinae, in the keratinous horn of taken from a subset of individuals in 2016 used in a pre- breeding Rhinoceros Auklets, adding to the assessment vious study by Wilkinson et al. (2018). Accuracy of sex- of occurrence within this subfamily. It also augments ing Rhinoceros Auklets using this function has been our understanding of ornamentation and individual sig- validated at 100%; however, this number should be nalling in this relatively widespread species. Of particu- viewed with caution given the relatively few individuals lar note was the presence of variation in the amount of used in the validation (n = 10). bill fluorescence between individual auklets. As causes Beta regression was used to test whether variability in for biofluorescence are often protein- or pigment-based the proportion of bill fluorescence was explained by the (Gruber & Sparks 2015, Protzel€ et al. 2018), it seems linear and interactive effects of sex and bill segment.