The Electrodynamics of Free and Bound Charge Electricity Generators using Impressed Sources and the Modification to Maxwell's Equations Michael E. Tobar,1, ∗ Ben T. McAllister,1 and Maxim Goryachev1 1ARC Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems and ARC Centre of Excellence for Dark Matter Particle Physics, Department of Physics, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. (Dated: January 8, 2021) Electric generators convert external energy, such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical and so forth, into electricity and are the foundation of power station and energy harvesting opera- tion. Inevitably, the external source supplies a force per unit charge (commonly referred to as an impressed electric field) to free or bound charge, which produces AC electricity. In general, the external impressed force acts outside Maxwell's equations and supplies a non-conservative electric action generating an oscillating electrodynamic degree of freedom. In this work we analyze the elec- trodynamics of ideal free and bound charge electricity generators by introducing a time dependent permanent polarization, which exists without any applied electric field, necessarily modifying the constitutive relations and essential to oscillate free or bound charge in a lossless way. For both cases, we show that Maxwell's equations, and in particular Faraday's law are modified, along with the required boundary conditions through the addition of an effective impressed magnetic current boundary source and the impressed electric field, related via the left hand rule. For the free charge case, we highlight the example of an electromagnetic generator based on Lorentz force, where the impressed force per unit charge that polarizes the conductor, comes from mechanical motion of free electrons due to the impressed velocity of the conductor relative to a stationary DC magnetic field. In contrast, the bound charge generator is simply an idealized permanently polarized bar electret, where the general case of a time dependent polarized electret is the underlying principle behind piezoelectric nano-generators. In the open circuit state, both bound and free charge electricity generators are equivalent to idealized Hertzian dipoles, with the open circuit voltage equal to the induced electromotive force (emf). Analyzing the short circuit responses, we show that the bound charge electricity generator has a capacitive source impedance. In contrast, we show for the ideal free charge AC electricity generator, the back emf from the inductance of the loop that defines the short circuit, directly cancels the source emf, so the voltage across the inductor is solely determined by the magnetic current boundary source. Thus, we determine the magnetic current boundary source best describes the output voltage of an AC generator, rather than the electric field. I. INTRODUCTION or MEMS device [2, 3], which can also be configured as an AC generator capable of generating radio frequencies of The most common form of electricity generation con- 60 − 260MHz [4]. A more recent type of generator is the verts motive (or mechanical) energy into photonic or elec- nanogenerator, which uses special materials that convert tromagnetic energy described by Faraday's law and is an external strain or motion to a time-dependent elec- known as an alternating current (AC) induction genera- tric polarization of a material independent of an applied tor. In general, the creation of photons or electricity via electric field[5, 6]. Such a device can convert mechanical Faraday's law must come from another external energy energy to electricity via a piezoelectric or triboelectric source to drive the turbines into motion. The conserva- effect [7{11], or temperature variations to electricity via tion of energy is a fundamental law of physics, but only a pyroelectric effect [12{18]. applies to an isolated system. This law means that en- When considering the generation of electricity only ergy cannot be created or destroyed, but only transferred from the view point of the created electromagnetic de- from one form to another. For example, a nuclear reac- gree of freedom, the creation of electromagnetic energy tion where mass is converted into other forms of energy is a non-conservative process. Thus, when we consider through E = mc2. In this case, if the other form of en- arXiv:1904.05774v5 [physics.class-ph] 7 Jan 2021 the electrodynamics in isolation to the whole system, the ergy is electricity, then we can call this device a nuclear standard Maxwell's equations must be made more gen- generator or battery. For example, a nuclear battery uses eral to take into account the non-conservative processes. the energy from the decay of a radioactive isotope to gen- This requires the ability to add the impressed forces into erate electricity and can produces large DC electric fields Maxwell's equations, and we show in this work, that this and voltages of up to 10-100 kV [1]. The modern form of can be achieved by generalising the constitutive relations. the nuclear battery is a micro-electromechanical system The modification of the constitutive relations inevitably leads to a modification of Maxwell's equations, in a simi- lar way to what happens when we consider the difference between Maxwell's equations in Matter and in Vacuum. ∗ [email protected] For example, in a dielectric medium, the applied electric 2 field polarizes the material, which causes an opposing in- µr = 1+χm0. The free and bound currents and charges in ternal electric force, which reduces the electric field in Maxwell's equations given above are not source terms for the medium, which modifies Gauss' Law. the fields and do not add energy into the system. They The standard Maxwell's equation in differential form either propagate without loss due to the interaction with and in dielectric and magnetic media are in general given the electromagnetic fields, or can describe a dissipative by (SI units), (or resistive) system where electromagnetic energy is lost, usually by conversion to heat (in this case the electric and r~ · D~ = ρf ; (1) magnetic field phasors can become complex). @D~ r~ × H~ − = J~ ; (2) @t f The non-electric energy sources (for example, nuclear energy as discussed previously) capable of transmitting energy and hence a force to electric charges are commonly ~ ~ r · B = 0; (3) referred to as \impressed" sources of the field. Theoreti- cally, they can be represented either as an ideal current or voltage generator of electronic network theory [19]. Thus @B~ r~ × E~ + = 0; (4) in electrodynamics, an impressed electric current needs @t to be added as a current source and hence will mod- where ify Ampere's law. In contrast, we show an impressed electric voltage needs to be added as a magnetic cur- −1 rent source, and hence will modify Faraday's law. The D~ = 0E~ + P~ H~ = µ B~ − M;~ (5) 0 later does not mean that magnetic monopole particles and exists, but is a consistent way to model boundary value problems when considering the electrodynamics of a non- ρb = −∇ · P~ J~b = r × M;~ (6) conservative electricity generator [20{22]. This technique is more generally known as the Compensation Theorem Here E~ is the electric field intensity, H~ is the magnetic [19, 23, 24]. We also note the impressed sources are not field intensity, D~ is the electric flux density, B~ is the mag- influenced by Maxwell's equations because they repre- sent creation of electromagnetic energy from an exter- netic flux density, J~f is the free electric current density, nal source. Two-potential theory is summarized in the J~ is the bound electric current density, ρ is the free elec- b f appendix, which is a common way to include the non- tric charge density, ρ is the bound electric charge density b conservative impressed terms in antenna theory. and 0 and µ0 are the permittivity and permeability of free space. When an electric field is applied to a dielectric mate- rial its molecules respond by forming microscopic elec- tric dipoles, which causes a distribution of bound charge In this paper we analyse the electrodynamics of free and bound charge electricity generators using impressed dependent on the applied field E~ , which acts to reduce sources. Importantly, we have shown that the impressed the electric field in the dielectric. For a dielectric mate- sources modify the constitutive relations, which essen- rial the macroscopic polarization vector, P~ is related to tially are the same as the force balance equations be- the average microscopic bound charge density by eqn. tween the external energy source and the electrodynamic (6). In a similar way when a B~ -field is supplied to generated degree of freedom. We show that this mod- a magnetic material, magnetic moments of the atoms ~ ifies Maxwell's equations with the addition of a free or align to cause a macroscopic magnetization M related bound charge macroscopic polarization, created without to the bound current given in eqn. (6). Thus in matter, an applied electric field. Because the vector curl of this Maxwell's equations can be fully specified in terms of the polarization is non-zero, we have shown that Faraday's ~ ~ ~ ~ E and B fields along with the auxiliary fields D and H law must be modified. We then apply this technique to given by eqns. (4), combined with the constitutive re- explain the physics of some free charge and bound charge lations given by eqns. (5). However, in order to fully electricity generators. In particular we find that the def- apply these equations the general relationships between inition of the voltage, Ve, of the electricity generator is the fields in eqns. (5) must be further specified, which i i best described by, Ve = −Im, where Im is the total effec- depend on the material properties.