Experimental Therapies for Relapsed Myeloma

Experimental Therapies for Relapsed Myeloma

New Therapies for Relapsed Myeloma Abramson Cancer Center Update in Hematologic Cancers Dan Vogl, MD MSCE Assistant Professor of Medicine Hematology/Oncology Division Abramson Cancer Center January 22, 2016 Disclosures Consulting: • Celgene Corporation • Onyx/Amgen • Millennium/Takeda Pharmaceuticals • Karyopharm Research support: • Millennium/Takeda Pharmaceuticals • Acetylon • GSK • Constellation • Calithera Topics Proteasome Inhibitors • Carfilzomib • Ixazomib Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors • Panobinostat • Ricolinostat Monoclonal antibodies • Daratumumab • Isatuximab • Elotuzumab Other drugs • Ibrutinib, vemurafenib, filanesib, selinexor Proteasome Inhibitors carfilzomib, ixazomib Carfilzomib: ASPIRE Planned interim analysis of a randomized, open-label phase III trial Pts with relapsed or KRd progressive MM, Carfilzomib Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16/cycles 1-12, Days 1, 2, 15, 16/cycles 13-18 1-3 prior treatments Lenalidomide Days 1-21 + with ≥ PR in Dexamethasone Days 1, 8, 15, 22 ≥ 1 prior regimen, 28-day cycle ECOG PS 0-2, and (n = 396) Until PD or CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min unacceptable (N = 792) toxicity Rd Lenalidomide Days 1-21 + Stratified by β2- microglobulin, prior Dexamethasone Days 1, 8, 15, 22 bortezomib, and prior 28-day cycle lenalidomide (n = 396) Carfilzomib: 20 mg/m2 Days 1, 2 of cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter. Lenalidomide: 25 mg. Dexamethasone: 40 mg. Stewart AK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:142-152. Carfilzomib: ASPIRE Better responses Toxicity • CR 32 vs 9% • More diarrhea, cough, fever, • ORR 87 vs 67% URI, hypokalemia, muscle Better PFS and (maybe) OS spasms, dyspnea, hypertension • No increase in heart failure or renal failure Stewart AK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:142-152. Carfilzomib: ENDEAVOR Study design: Randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial Relapsed MM with 1-3 previous lines of therapy; prior Kd* V or K if response occurred (n = 464) Until PD or with no discontinuation due to unacceptable toxicity (N = 929) † toxicity Stratified by prior PI therapy, Vd prior lines of treatment, ISS (n = 465) stage, and route of V administration (IV vs SC) *Carfilzomib: 20 mg/m2 IV on Days 1, 2 (cycle 1), then 56 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 of a 28-day cycle; dexamethasone: 20 mg on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23 of a 28-day cycle. †Bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m2 IV or SC on Days 1, 4, 8, 11 of a 21-day cycle; dexamethasone: 20 mg on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 of a 21-day cycle Dimopoulos MA, et al. ASCO 2015. Abstract 8509. Carfilzomib: ENDEAVOR Response better with carfilzomib • ORR 77% vs 63% (p<0.0001) • CR 13% vs 6% (p=0.001) PFS better with carfilzomib • HR 0.53, p<0.0001 • In patients with prior bortezomib • In patients with no prior bortezomib Toxicity: • More anemia, dyspnea, fever, cough, hypertension, muscle spasms, headache, • Similar thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, edema, fatigue, nausea • Less constipation, neuropathy, dizziness Carfilzomib: Weekly dosing CHAMPION-1 • Carfilzomib over 30 min 1, 8, 15 of 28, with dexamethasone 40 weekly • Phase 1: 45, 56, 70, 88 mg/m2 (n=27) • MTD 70 mg/m2 (n=104) • 1-3 prior lines, carfilzomib-naïve, 52% Bz-refractory, 19% dual refractory • ORR: 77% (63% Bz-refractory, 55% dual-refractory) • Toxicity: fatigue (11% gr3), hypertension (8% gr3), nausea, diarrhea Berenson, ASH 2015, abstract 373. wCCyD • Newly diagnosed, transplant ineligible • Weekly dosing on days 1, 8, 15 of 28 – Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 PO – Carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 – Dexamethasone 40 mg • ORR 80% • Toxicity: neutropenia (22% gr3/4), thrombocytopenia (7% gr3/4), pulmonary edema (5%) Bringhen, ASH 2015, Abstract 1828.. Ixazomib: TOURMALINE-MM1 Oral boronate proteasome inhibitor Toxicity: thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, nausea, diarrhea, rash Single agent responses: ≥PR 27% Kumar SK, Blood 2014;124(7):1047-1055 Stratified by prior therapy (1 vs 2-3), ISS stage (I-II vs III), and prior PI exposure (yes vs no) Ixazomib 4 mg PO D1,8,15 + R/R MM pts with Lenalidomide 25 mg* D1-21 + measurable disease; Dexamethasone 40 mg D1,8,15,22 28-day cycles 1-3 prior treatments; (n = 360) CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min; until PD or not refractory to PIs or Placebo D1,8,15 + unacceptable lenalidomide Lenalidomide 25 mg* D1-21 + toxicity (N = 722) Dexamethasone 40 mg D1,8,15,22 (n = 362) *10 mg for pts with CrCl ≤ 60 or ≤ 50 mL/min. Moreau P, et al. ASH 2015. Abstract 727 Ixazomib: TOURMALINE-MM1 Responses: better with ixazomib (ORR 78 vs 72%, CR 12 vs 7%) PFS: better with ixazomib (HR 0.74, p=0.01) Toxicity: More thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, neuropathy, rash Moreau P, et al. ASH 2015. Abstract 727 HDAC inhibitors panobinostat, ricolinostat Panobinostat: PANORAMA1 Study design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial Stratified by # of prior therapies and prior bortezomib (n = 387) Panobinostat 20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 of 21 Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 4, 8, 11* Pts with measureable Dexamethasone 20 mg days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12* R/R MM after 1-3 prior treatments, excluding primary refractory or 21 day cycles bortezomib-refractory (N = 792) (n = 381) Placebo days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 of 21 Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 4, 8, 11* Dexamethasone 20 mg days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12* *After cycle 8, bortezomib given on Days 1 and 8 of 21 and dexamethasone on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 of 21 San Miguel JF, et al. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(11)1195-1206. Panobinostat: PANORAMA1 Responses: CR 11% vs 6% ≥PR 61% vs 55% Progression-free survival: 12 vs 8 months (HR 0.63, p<0.0001) Overall survival: 34 vs 30 months (HR 0.97, p=0.26) Toxicity: • Diarrhea: 68 vs 42% (gr 3/4 25 vs 7%) • Fatigue 57 vs 41% (gr 3/4 24 vs 12%) • Nausea 36 vs 21% • Edema 29 vs 19% • Fever 26 vs 15% • Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia 68 vs 31% • Gr 3/4 neutropenia 35 vs 11% Panobinostat with carfilzomib/dexamethasone Phase I trial • Panobinostat 15-20 mg TIW 3 of 4 weeks • Carfilzomib 20/27-20/45 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28 • Dexamethasone 4 mg prior to each carfilzomib dose during cycle 1 MTD: panobinostat 20 mg, carfilzomib 20/36 Efficacy: • All patients: ≥PR 46%, ≥ MR 58%, median PFS 11.4 months • Bortezomib-refractory: ≥ PR 44%, ≥ MR 50% Toxcity: • Anemia (38% gr 3/4), thrombocytopenia (38% gr 3/4), neutropenia (19% gr 3/4), diarrhea (50%, 8% gr 3/4), nausea (65%), anorexia (27%, 8% gr 3/4) Kaufman JL, et al. ASH 2014. Abstract 32. bortezomib/dex with ricolinostat (ACY-1215) Ricolinostat is a selective inhibitor of HDAC6 Phase 1b study: • Ricolinostat 40 mg qd – 160 mg bid on days 1-5 and 8-12 of 21 • Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV (cycle 1+) or SC (cycle 2+) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 • Dexamethasone 20 mg PO or IV on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 Prior therapies: • Median 5 lines • 77% refractory to most recent therapy • 88% prior lenalidomide • 100% prior bortezomib, 63% bortezomib-refractory Efficacy: • All patients: ≥PR 30%, ≥MR 34% • Bortezomib-refractory: ≥PR 14%, ≥MR 21% Toxicity: • Diarrhea (20 gr 1-2, 3 gr 3) • Fatigue (13 gr 1-2, 3 gr 3) • Thrombocytopenia (13 gr 3-4) Vogl et al, ASH 2014, Abstract 759 Vogl et al, ASH 2015, Abstract 1827 Monoclonal antibodies daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab Daratumumab Human monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 Phase 2 dose: 16 mg/kg qwk x2m, q2 wks x4m, then q4 wks Single agent activity: phase 1/2 study in rel/refr myeloma • ORR 31%, VGPR 13%, 1 year PFS 46% Usmani et al, ASH 2015, Abstract 29 Combination with len/dex: phase I/II trial in rel/ref myeloma • Phase 2 dose with len 25 mg on days 1-21 of 28 and dex 40 mg/wk • median 2 prior lines, 3/45 patients len-refractory • ORR 81%, 34% CR, 25% sCR • Toxicity: Cytopenias (c/w lenalidomide), Infusion reactions (19/45) • Updated ASH 2015 with similar results Plesner et al. ASH 2014. Abstract 84 Plesner et al. ASH 2015. Abstract 507 Daratumumab Combination with pom/dex: phase I/II trial in rel/ref myeloma • >= 2 prior lines of therapy, including len and Bz • 98 patients, refractory to Bz (66%), Cz (30%), Len (89%), dual (67%) • Phase 2 dose with pom 4 mg on days 1-21 of 28 and dex 40 mg/wk • ORR 71% overall, 67% dual refractory • Infusion reactions, cytopenias (60% gr 3/4 neutropenia), fatigue Chari, et al. ASH 2015. Abstract 508 Daratumumab: Infusion reactions 38% (1st infusion: 36%, 2nd: 2%, 3rd+: 3%) Mostly grade 1-2 Infusion Grade 3: reaction bronchospasm, prophylaxis dyspnea, chills/CRS, hypertension MonteleukastINFUSION: 101 mg qhs, days2 -1, 0, +1, +2 (x3+ 4 weeks) Volume 1000 mL 500 mL 500 mL MethylprednisoloneStart 50 mL/h 100 mg IV50 mL/h 100 mL/h Acetaminophen• increase to 200 mL/h 975 at 50mg mL/h PO intervals Diphenhydramine• with reaction: pause, restart25 mg at IV50% of previous rate PRNPremedication: famotidine 20 mg IV, lorazepam 1 mg IV Methylprednisolone 100 mg (1st and 2nd) or 60 mg (3rd +) Acetaminophen 650-1000 mg DexamethasoneDiphenhydramine 25-50 4 mgmg PO, days +1, +2 Post-medication COPD/asthma:Methylprednisolone 20 inhaled mg on days corticosteroid 2 and 3 of each days infusion 0, +1 Zoster prophylaxis Voorhees, ASH 2015, Abstract 1829. Daratumumab: RBC transfusion Binds CD38 on RBCs, agglutinates on indirect antibody testing (IAT) Delays identification of RBC units Patients can be transfused safely even with +IAT Chari et al.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us