The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Clients of Prostitute Women: Deterrence, Prevalence, Characteristics, and Violence Author(s): Devon D. Brewer ; John J. Potterat ; Stephen Q. Muth ; John M. Roberts, Jr. ; Jonathan A. Dudek ; Donald E. Woodhouse Document No.: 218253 Date Received: April 2007 Award Number: 2003-IJ-CX-1036 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. 2003-IJ-CX-1036 Final report S-1 Final report Clients of Prostitute Women: Deterrence, Prevalence, Characteristics, and Violence National Institute of Justice research grant no. 2003-IJ-CX-1036 Devon D. Brewer, Ph.D., Interdisciplinary Scientific Research, Principal Investigator Executive summary Prostitution is often associated with illegal drug markets, crime, violence, other negative impacts on neighborhoods, and sexually transmitted disease. Despite the problems of public safety, order, and health linked to prostitution, there is remarkably little good empirical information on key facets of the problem, especially regarding male clients of prostitute women. We carried out a multi-stranded project to address some of these gaps in knowledge. The goals of this project were to: 1) assess the specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing a prostitute; 2) estimate the prevalence of clients overall and the subset of clients who are violent toward prostitutes; 3) compare clients with the general population of men in terms of demographics and geography; and 4) compare clients who are violent toward prostitute women with clients overall in terms of demographics, geography, and criminal history. We discuss the project components and results corresponding to each of these goals in turn. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. 2003-IJ-CX-1036 Final report S-2 Goal 1: Assess the specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing a prostitute (chapter 1) Prior research suggests that arrest, compared with no police detection, of some types of offenders does not decrease the chances they will reoffend. We assessed the specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing a street prostitute in Colorado Springs by comparing the incidence of arrest for clients of prostitutes first detected through public health surveillance with the incidence of rearrest for clients first detected by police arrest. Although these sets of clients were demographically and behaviorally similar, arrest reduced the likelihood of a subsequent arrest by approximately 70%. In other areas of the US, arrest did not appear to displace a client’s patronizing. Thus, our results suggest that apprehending clients decreases their patronizing behavior substantially. Given the large specific deterrent effect of arrest, any special post-arrest intervention or extra penalty for patronizing (such as “john school” programs) may not have a noticeable impact, as there may be little additional deterrence that could be achieved. Goal 2: Estimate the prevalence of clients overall and the subset of clients who are violent toward prostitutes (chapter 2) The only prior estimates of client prevalence have been based on surveys, although methodological investigations indicate that men substantially underreport patronizing. Therefore, we sought to use alternate methods, such as capture-recapture techniques, for this estimation problem. Capture-recapture methods are often used to estimate the size of populations that are difficult or impossible to find and count. One basic capture­ This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. 2003-IJ-CX-1036 Final report S-3 recapture approach involves observing one sample of individuals over a period of time and noting the number of times each individual in the sample is encountered or “captured”. Features of the frequency distribution of captures can indicate the number of individuals in the population not observed, thus providing the means to estimate the overall population size. Arrest data constitute this sort of one-sample capture-recapture data. We requested prostitution arrest data from approximately 30 local US jurisdictions and all 50 states. We analyzed suitable data on men arrested for patronizing a prostitute from 6 metropolitan communities (Dallas county, TX, Harris and Galveston counties, TX, Indianapolis, IN, Kansas City, MO, Portland, OR, and Yakima, WA). We applied a capture-recapture analytic method that can incorporate a deterrence factor (we used our estimate of the specific deterrent effect of arrest for patronizing, as reported in chapter 1). We supplemented these capture-recapture estimates with a prevalence estimate from Colorado Springs derived algebraically from a unique combination of local data on the prevalence of prostitutes, their number of clients, and clients’ number of prostitute sex partners. We also compared these estimates to those from the General Social Surveys (GSS), a regular national probability sample household survey. In addition, we analyzed data on reported frequency and settings of patronizing from a Colorado Springs study that included many clients. Client arrests occurred in the same areas as prostitute arrests, confirming other indications from police arrest and sting procedures that arrested clients constitute a representative sample of clients of street prostitutes, weighted by frequency of patronizing. Capture-recapture analyses of arrest data indicated that about 2-3% of This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. 2003-IJ-CX-1036 Final report S-4 local male residents in large metropolitan areas in the US patronized local street prostitutes during observation periods of 2 to 5 years. The independent estimate from Colorado Springs, based on the prevalence of local prostitutes, their mean number of their client sex partners, and clients’ mean number of prostitute sex partners, showed a similar client prevalence of 3.5% for a 1-year period. These prevalence estimates were almost twice as large as those based on self-reports in the GSS, adjusted for the size and type of municipalities in the corresponding local metropolitan areas. The capture- recapture estimate for the smallest metropolitan area, Yakima, pointed to a client prevalence about half that of the larger communities, and the GSS estimate for a small metropolitan area was also substantially lower than GSS estimates for larger communities. There was no increasing or decreasing trend in client prevalence over the last two decades in either the capture-recapture and survey estimates. Almost three- quarters of clients identified in a Colorado Springs study patronized on the street, suggesting that the off-street sector accounts for a fairly small portion of commercial sexual partnerships. Furthermore, the very large majority of the clients were not arrested during observation periods as long as 10-years. Our results bolster prior methodological research that men underreport their patronizing activity in surveys. Furthermore, not only do capture-recapture analyses of arrest data appear to produce more accurate estimates of client prevalence, such procedures are much quicker and far less costly to implement than large-scale probability sample population surveys. Given that most clients were not arrested, especially intensive enforcement against patronizing (with the corresponding large deterrent effect of arrest on subsequent patronizing) and/or wider publicity about the risk This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. 2003-IJ-CX-1036 Final report S-5 and consequences of arrest may be necessary to reduce the extent of prostitution substantially. We were unable to estimate the prevalence of clients who are violent toward prostitutes because the data we gathered for this objective were too incomplete for meaningful analysis. Goal 3: Compare clients with the general population of men in terms of demographics and geography (chapter 3) One of the first steps toward understanding the forces that underlie prostitution is to determine factors that differentiate men who patronize prostitutes from those who do not. Prior research on this topic has involved inadequate sampling and ascertainment of clients. Thus, we compared clients arrested for