Just-In-Time Java Compilation for the Itanium® Processor

Just-In-Time Java Compilation for the Itanium® Processor

Just-In-Time Java TM Compilation for the Itanium£ Processor Tatiana Shpeisman Guei-Yuan Lueh Ali-Reza Adl-Tabatabai Intel Labs Intel China Research Center Intel Labs [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract because it is partially responsible for enforcing security (for example, by inserting checks or unwinding stack frames) – This paper describes a just-in-time (JIT) Java1 aggressive ILP optimizations (such as predication, compiler for the Intel£ Itanium£ processor. The Itanium speculation, and global scheduling) are complicated and processor is an example of an Explicitly Parallel time consuming to implement reliably. Instruction Computing (EPIC) architecture and thus In this paper, we describe lightweight code generation relies on aggressive and expensive compiler optimizations techniques for generating efficient Itanium code from Java for performance. Static compilers for Itanium use byte codes. We also describe potential pitfalls in Itanium aggressive global scheduling algorithms to extract code generation as well as optimizations that are of limited instruction-level parallelism. In a JIT compiler, however, effectiveness. Our JIT compiler relies on several the additional overhead of such expensive optimizations inexpensive techniques to generate efficient Itanium code. may offset any gains from the improved code. First, the compiler uses heuristics to model Itanium micro In this paper, we describe lightweight code architecture features (e.g., bypass latencies and execution generation techniques for generating efficient Itanium unit resources). Second, the compiler leverages the code. Our compiler relies on two basic methods to semantics and metadata of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) generate efficient code. First, the compiler uses [17] to extract ILP. Our experimental results show that the inexpensive scheduling heuristics to model the Itanium goal of inexpensive but effective optimizations on Itanium microarchitecture. Second, the compiler uses the is achievable. semantics of the Java virtual machine to extract The JIT compiler is part of the Open Runtime Platform instruction-level parallelism. (ORP) [15], an open source JVM that uses the GNU classpath Java libraries [10]. We ported ORP to run on the Itanium Processor Family (IPF) but we have not yet tuned 1. Introduction the performance of ORP’s machine-specific and performance-critical components, such as synchronization, This paper describes a just-in-time (JIT) Java byte garbage collection, and exception handling. Figure 1 code compiler for the Intel Itanium processor. The compares the performance of ORP with the IBM JDK v1.3 Itanium processor is a statically scheduled machine that Beta 2 (which is also an IPF JVM) for several benchmarks can issue up to 6 instructions per cycle – its performance, from the Spec JVM98 benchmark suite [21]. These therefore, depends on aggressive compiler techniques that measurements were gathered on a 733 MHZ Itanium extract instruction-level parallelism (ILP). Building a JIT workstation. ORP is competitive with the IBM JDK for compiler for this processor is challenging for two reasons. compute-intensive benchmarks such as 201_compress, First, the time and space taken by the JIT is an overhead 202_jess and 222_mpegaudio, all of which spend most of on program execution – applying aggressive (time and their execution time in JIT-compiled code. The IBM JDK memory consuming) JIT optimizations to obtain the last outperforms ORP significantly for benchmarks that demand few percentage of performance gain may not be justified fast synchronization (227_mtrt and 209_db) and exception because the additional compilation overhead will slow handling (228_jack). down application load time, which may offset any gains The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. from optimizations. Second, a Java JIT must be reliable Section 2 presents an overview of the IPF architecture and the Itanium processor micro architecture. Section 3 1 All third party trademarks, trade names, and other describes the optimization phases of our JIT compiler. brands are the property of their respective owners Section 4 describes the register allocator, which is based on the linear scan register allocation algorithm [19] IBM ORP and enhancements that minimize the amount of information the compiler has to store to support garbage 1.8 collection. We propose an improved linear scan allocator 1.6 that performs register coalescing without increasing the 1.4 1.2 asymptotic complexity of the allocator. 1.0 0.8 Section 5 describes the code scheduler. We show 0.6 how the scheduler models the latencies and resource 0.4 0.2 constraints of the Itanium processor, and performs 0.0 memory disambiguation and safe speculation of memory t loads by leveraging the rich metadata provided by the ss tr Normalized execution time ress e udio p 2_j 28_jack JVM. om _209_dbpega Section 6 describes Itanium-specific optimizations _20 _227_m _2 GEOMEAN 01_c 2_m that have only minor benefits (aggressive sign-extension _2 _22 optimization and predication) and describes the potential pitfall of ignoring branch hint bits on the Itanium processor. Figure 1. Performance comparison of ORP versus IBM JDK. 2. The Itanium processor extension instructions whenever the upper 32 sign bits may The IPF architecture organizes instructions into static affect program semantics. groups called bundles [13]. A bundle is 128 bits long and One of the salient features of the IPF architecture is contains 3 instruction slots. Each instruction has a type (I, predication. Most instructions have a qualifying predicate – M, F, B, A, L) corresponding to the execution unit type if the predicate is evaluated to true, the processor commits on which the instruction will execute. The I-, M-, F- and the instruction’s side effects to the architectural state; B-type instructions can be executed only on integer, otherwise, the processor discards the instruction’s side memory, floating-point or branch units, respectively. A- effects. Predication is used to remove branches, thus type (arithmetic) instructions, such as integer add, can be reducing branch misprediction penalties, increasing the executed on either memory units or integer units. L-type scope for instruction scheduling, and possibly reducing path instructions are for loading of 64-bit immediates and use lengths. the integer and floating-point units. L-type instructions Another feature of the IPF architecture is branch take two slots in a bundle; all other instructions take one prediction hint bits, which allow a compiler to specify what slot. Only certain combinations of instruction types are kind of branch prediction should be done for a branch valid inside each bundle. There are 24 valid combinations instruction. The branch prediction hint can be one of four each of which is called a template. Some templates values: statically taken, statically not taken, dynamically contain stop bits, which indicate cycle breaks between taken, and dynamically not taken. The usage of the hint is instructions – these are necessary to enforce dependencies micro architecture specific. between instructions within and across bundles. The The Itanium processor [14] is an implementation of the sequence of instructions between stop bits or between a IPF architecture. This processor can decode two bundles stop bit and a taken branch is called an instruction group. per cycle and issue up to six instructions per cycle. The The IPF architecture is a load-store architecture and micro architecture has nine execution units: two memory, has only the register indirect addressing mode for data two integer, two floating-point and three branch units. NOP access instructions. The register file contains 128 integer, instructions are assigned to execution units and are executed 128 floating-point, 64 predicate, and 8 branch registers. like any other instruction. The micro architecture will stall if The integer registers are divided into 96 stack registers the instructions inside an instruction group oversubscribe and 32 static registers. Each procedure starts by allocating the processor’s execution unit resources. The execution a register frame using the alloc instruction. The Register units have varying execution latencies and there are non- Stack Engine (RSE) ensures that the requested number of unit bypass latencies between certain execution units. registers is available to the method by moving registers between the register stack and the backing store in 3. Compiler overview memory without explicit program intervention. The IPF architecture is a 64-bit architecture and There are two kinds of compilation infrastructures that provides limited support for 32-bit integer arithmetic. are commonly adopted in JVM implementation: mixed Load instructions zero-extend 8-, 16- and 32-bit integer mode and compilation mode. The former comprises of an values. The compiler must generate explicit sign- interpreter that interprets cold (infrequently-executed) optimization phase, which performs copy propagation, methods and a compiler that compiles identified hot constant folding, dead code elimination [2], and null pointer (frequently-executed) methods [23][22]. The later check elimination. compiles methods using either multiple JIT compilers [8] The first phase of the compiler back end is code or multi-level compilation [4]. The infrastructure we use selection, which lowers high-level operations (such as field is compilation mode, which is similar to JUDO [8]. The or array

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us