Phylogeography, Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Poecilosclerid Sponge Phorbas Fictitius at Oceanic Islands

Phylogeography, Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Poecilosclerid Sponge Phorbas Fictitius at Oceanic Islands

Contributions to Zoology, 79 (3) 119-129 (2010) Phylogeography, genetic diversity and structure of the poecilosclerid sponge Phorbas fictitius at oceanic islands Joana R. Xavier1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Rob W.M. van Soest2, Johannes A.J. Breeuwer1, António M.F. Martins3, Steph B.J. Menken1 1 Evolutionary Biology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 318, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, section Zoological Museum of Amsterdam (ZMA), University of Amsterdam, Mauritskade 57, 1092 AD Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 CIBIO - Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, CIBIO-Azores, Department of Biology, Univer- sity of the Azores, Rua Mãe de Deus, 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, Portugal (current address J.R. Xavier) 4 CEAB - Centre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CSIC), Camí d’accés a la Cala S. Francesc, 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain (current address J.R. Xavier) 5 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: Azores, genetic diversity, Iberia, Macaronesia, mitochondrial DNA, Porifera Abstract Sampling ................................................................................... 121 DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing ............... 121 In this study we assessed the sequence variation in the I3-M11 Data analyses .......................................................................... 122 partition of the mtDNA cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene Genetic diversity and structure ............................................ 122 (COI) in ten populations of the Atlanto-Mediterranean demos- Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships ............ 122 ponge Phorbas fictitius(Porifera: Poecilosclerida) at two spatial Results ............................................................................................. 123 scales: a regional scale comparing mainland (Iberian) and insu- Sequence variation and genetic diversity .......................... 123 lar (Macaronesian) populations, and a local (Archipelagic) scale Phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships ............ 123 focusing on different island populations of the Azores archipel- Differentiation and structure at regional and local scales ............................................................................... 125 ago. A multiple approach combining diversity measures, FST es- timates, phylogenetic inference and nested clade phylogeo- Discussion ...................................................................................... 125 graphic analysis was used to assess the genetic structure and Sequence variation and the use of an alternative elucidate the evolutionary history of this species. Genetic dif- partition of COI ....................................................................... 125 Structure of P. fictitius at regional and local scales ........ 126 ferentiation, based of FST estimates, was found among most populations at both scales revealing highly structured popula- Phylogeography of P. fictitius .............................................. 127 tions. This results of a presumably low dispersal potential and The Macaronesian refugium ................................................. 127 bathymetric range of the species, and the geographical isolation Acknowledgements ...................................................................... 128 of the studied populations. However we found evidence of long References ...................................................................................... 128 distance dispersal events between some populations. Phyloge- netic and network analyses indicate a separation of insular (Macaronesian) and mainland (Iberian) clades with only two Introduction haplotypes shared between these areas. The high genetic diver- sity and prevalence of ancestral haplotypes suggest the Macaro- nesian islands as the likely place of origin of this species with Understanding the spatial patterns of genetic diversity posterior expansion to mainland locations via current-mediated and both the historical and contemporary factors that dispersal of larvae or sponge fragments. This study adds to the have shaped such genetic structure is crucial for the growing evidence of structured populations in the marine realm development of effective conservation strategies in the and highlights the importance of the Macaronesian islands on increasingly threatened marine realm. The Northeast the evolutionary history of the Northeast Atlantic marine biota. Atlantic and Mediterranean region provides an inter- esting as well as challenging model area to study these Contents topics for several reasons: it presents an extremely di- verse and relatively well studied biota; it encompasses Introduction .................................................................................... 119 a wide range of subtropical, temperate, and subarctic Material and methods ................................................................... 121 climatic conditions; it possesses some distinguishable Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 03:30:53PM via free access 120 Xavier et al. – Phylogeography and genetic structure of the sponge Phorbas fictitius putative physical barriers (e.g. Strait of Gibraltar, Eng- Sponges constitute a dominant group in hard-bot- lish Channel); and it experienced a complex geologi- tom benthic communities both in terms of biomass and cal and climatological history in both the recent (e.g. species richness (Sarà and Vacelet, 1973). They are Last Glacial Maximum, 30-19 kyr BP) as well as the sessile in the adult phase and only disperse by means remote past (e.g. the Messinian Salinity Crisis, 5.9-5.3 of lecitotrophic larvae with a life span of a few days to Myr BP). two weeks (Maldonado, 2006). Although passive dis- Over the past decade, the phylogeography and pop- persal by water currents may occur, most sponge lar- ulation genetics of a great variety of marine organisms vae appear to remain in the immediate vicinity of the throughout the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean parental location (Mariani et al., 2005, 2006). This low has been the focus of many investigations. These stud- dispersal potential has important consequences for the ies uncovered, among other things, the influence of connectivity and structure of sponge populations. Sur- physical barriers, biological traits, and past climate on prisingly, studies addressing the population genetics the structuring of current patterns of genetic diversity and phylogeography of sponges are still scarce and and divergence among populations (see reviews in Pa- limited to a handful of species worldwide (e.g. Wör- tarnello et al., 2007; Maggs et al., 2008). However, heide et al., 2002; Duran et al., 2004a; Wörheide, most studies have focused on the mainland shores and 2006; Bentlage and Wörheide, 2007; Wörheide et al., only few examined populations of the Macaronesian 2008; Blanquer et al., 2009; DeBiasse et al., 2010). In islands (e.g. Domingues et al., 2006, 2007b, c, 2008; the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean areas, and Chevolot et al., 2006). despite a remarkable diversity of 700+ shallow-water Fig. 1. Geographical distribution of mtDNA haplotypes of Phorbas fictitius at (A) regional (Iberian/Macaronesian) and (B) local (Archipelagic) scales. Letters in parentheses refer to popula- tion codes (see Table 1). Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 03:30:53PM via free access Contributions to Zoology, 79 (3) – 2010 121 species, studies into the phylogeography of sponges Northeast Atlantic (from the West coast of Scotland to are restricted to a single species, the Mediterranean the Canaries) and Mediterranean (from Alboran to the Crambe crambe, that also occurs at some locations in Aegean Sea). No specific information is available adjacent Atlantic waters. In a first study, Duran and co- about the reproductive ecology of P. fictitius, but mem- workers reported low sequence variation of the cyto- bers of the family Hymedesmiidae, to which this spe- chrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) in sponges cies belongs, are known to release brooded larvae to (Duran et al., 2004c). In fact, with only two mtDNA the surrounding water (Maldonado, 2006). The main haplotypes detected in samples spanning over 3,000 goal of this study was to assess the extent of genetic km, Folmer’s COI fragment (Folmer et al., 1994) in differentiation and structure of P. fictitius populations sponges proved to be amongst the slowest evolving at regional [Iberian (mainland) versus Macaronesian ones reported for marine organisms. Although some (island) populations] and local (populations of differ- genetic structure was found among Atlantic and Medi- ent islands of the Azores archipelago) scales. terranean populations, this gene fragment failed to re- veal the phylogeographic history of the species. Soon after, sensitivity was increased by sequencing the nu- Material and methods clear rDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS-1 and ITS-2) and microsatellite genotyping for the same Sampling specimens and a recent origin of the species or, alter- natively, a recent bottleneck followed by a range ex- Specimens of P. fictitius (total n = 94) were collected pansion from the Mediterranean to the Macaronesian by scuba-diving at ten locations separated by distances islands by human-mediated transport was then pro- ranging from 55 to 3250 km (Fig. 1, Table 1). Speci- posed (Duran et al., 2004a, b). mens were preserved in 96% ethanol and deposited in In the present study, we examined the genetic struc- the Porifera collection

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us