Open issues in neutrino astrophysics 1, Cristina Volpe ∗ 1AstroParticule et Cosmologie (APC), UMR 7164-CNRS, Universit´eParis Diderot-Paris 7, 10, rue Alice Domon et L´eonieDuquet, 75205 Paris cedex 13, France Neutrinos of astrophysical origin are messengers produced in stars, in explosive phenomena like core-collapse supernovae, in the accretion disks around black holes, or in the Earth's atmosphere. Their fluxes and spectra encode information on the environments that produce them. Such fluxes are modified in characteristic ways when neutrinos traverse a medium. Here our current under- standing of neutrino flavour conversion in media is summarized. The importance of this domain for astrophysical observations is emphasized. Examples are given of the fundamental properties that astrophysical neutrinos have uncovered, or might reveal in the future. I. INTRODUCTION R. Davis' pioneering measurement of electron neutri- nos emitted by the sun has opened the era of neutrino astronomy [1]. A significant deficit, compared to the standard solar model predictions, was rapidly measured, triggering several decades of experiments of solar neu- trino experiments [2{6] to investigate, if unknown neu- trino properties, or solar model uncertainties [7{10], were at its origin. Electron antineutrinos produced by a mas- sive star were first detected during the SN1987A explo- sion. A burst was first seen in Kamiokande, the electron direction pointing to the Large Magellanic Cloud at 50 FIG. 1. Electron anti-neutrino events measured by the kpc from the Milky Way. The occurrence probability Kamiokande, Baksan, IMB and LSD experiments during the of having 9 events per 10 seconds was determined to be supernova 1987A, in the Large Magellanic Cloud [11]. 8 less than 5.7 10− [11]. Altogether the Kamiokande, IMB, Baksan× and Mont Blanc detectors observed about twenty events [12{15], in the 40 MeV energy range dur- Super-Kamiokande experiment solved the atmospheric ing 13 seconds (Figure 1). Their angular dependence and anomaly and brought a milestone in the solution of the energy distribution are reasonably consistent with expec- "solar neutrino deficit” problem [23]. In fact, a deficit tations from core-collapse supernova simulations (see e.g. of upgoing atmospheric muon neutrinos traversing the [16] for a recent analysis). The detection of these events Earth was observed, compared to down-going ones, that constitute the first experimental confirmation of the pre- was shown to be consistent with the hypothesis that up- dictions from supernova simulation. In 2002, R. Davis going muon neutrinos convert into tau neutrinos (Figure arXiv:1303.1681v2 [hep-ph] 28 Jun 2013 and M. Koshiba were awarded the Nobel Prize, for "pi- 2). This discovery has fundamental implications for high- oneering contributions to astrophysics, in particular for energy physics, astrophysics and cosmology. For exam- the detection of cosmic neutrinos". The prize was shared ple, neutrinos from the sun give us direct confirmation with R. Giacconi for "for pioneering contributions to as- of the energy production mechanisms in stars (see the trophysics, which have led to the discovery of cosmic X- seminal works [24, 25]). ray sources". At the same epoch of the solar puzzle, The neutrino oscillation phenomenon occurs if neutri- experiments searching for proton decay were measuring nos have non-zero masses and mixings. The possibil- an anomaly in the atmospheric neutrino background [17{ ity to have ν-¯ν oscillations was first pointed out by B. 22]. In 1998 the discovery of neutrino oscillations by the Pontecorvo in analogy with K K¯ mesons [26]. Neu- 0 − 0 trino oscillations require that the flavour να and the mass νi basis are related by να = Uαi∗ νi with U being the ∗ [email protected] Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMSN) unitary ma- 2 3 2 2 trix [27]. In the three-flavour framework the U matrix 0:12) 10− eV , as well as the mixing angles sin (2θ12) = 2 reads 0:857 0:024, sin (2θ23) > 0:95 [28]. An indication for a nonzero± third neutrino mixing angle has been found by U = VD (1) the T2K [30] and the Double-Chooz collaborations [31]; while RENO [32] and Daya-Bay have measured θ13 to be with a possible parametrization given by [28] : sin2(2θ ) = 0:092 0:016(stat) 0:005(syst) [33]. 13 ± ± While the experimental progress is impressive, numer- 0 c c s c s e iδ 1 12 13 12 13 13 −ous features remain unrevealed. First, the mechanism V = s c c s s eiδ c c s s s eiδ s c @ 12 23 12 23 13 12 23 12 23 13 23 13thatA gives a mass to the neutrino is unknown. Depend- s− s −c c s eiδ c s − s c s eiδ c c 12 23 12 23 13 12 23 12 23 13 23 13ing on the neutrino nature, introducing a neutrino mass − − − (2) might require a right-handed neutrino singlet (that does where c = cos θ and s = sin θ and ij ij ij ij not couple to the gauge bosons) or, for example, more 0 1 complex mechanisms of the see-saw type(s) which need e iφ1 0 0 − significant extensions of the Standard Model. There is D = 0 1 0 (3) @ A the mass hierarchy problem. In fact, there are two ways 0 0 e iφ2 − to order the mass eigenstates since one of the ∆m2 signs is unknown. The case ∆m2 > 0 corresponds to the The V matrix is analogous to the Cabibbo-Kobayashi- 13 normal hierarchy, while ∆m2 < 0 corresponds to the Maskawa matrix, in the quark sector, although the mix- 13 inverted. Tritium beta-decay experiments give informa- ing angles are there measured to be small. The φ ; φ are 1 2 tion on the absolute mass scale. The current upper limit two extra phases that appear in case neutrinos are Majo- is of about 2 eV for the electron neutrino effective mass rana particles. Therefore the PMNS matrix depends on [28]. This will be significantly improved by the KATRIN three mixing angles, two Majorana-type and one Dirac- experiment that has a discovery potential for a neutrino type phases. (Here we will not discuss the Majorana mass of 0.35 eV at 5 σ [34]. Moreover, key open issues are phases, since they do not influence neutrino oscillations the existence of leptonic CP violation, of sterile neutri- in vacuum and in matter.) If the Dirac-type phase is nos and the identification of the ν Dirac versus Majorana non-zero, the PMNS matrix is complex, introducing a nature. difference between the neutrino oscillation probability, and the corresponding ones for antineutrinos, implying Interestingly, the ensemble of experimental data CP violation in the lepton sector (for a neutrino physics' present a few anomalies that cannot be cast in the three- overview, see the recent comprehensive book [29]). active neutrino framework. The neutrino flux measure- 37 51 Oscillations in vacuum is an interference phenomenon ment from intense static Ar and Cr sources in the among the matter eigenstates, which is sensitive to their GALLEX and SAGE experiments present an anomalous mass-squared differences and to the mixing angles. In the deficit of electron neutrinos (the "Gallium anomaly"). A two-flavour framework, the oscillation appearance prob- recent analysis finds a statistical significance at 3 σ [35]. ability for relativistic neutrinos is given by The LSND collaboration has found evidence for oscilla- tions at δm2 = 1 eV 2 (for small mixing angles) using 2 2 2 P (να νβ) = sin (2θ) sin (∆m12L=4E); (4) decay-at-rest muons [36] and decay-in-flight pions [37]. ! Most of the parameter regions identified by LSND have E being the neutrino energy, L the source-detector dis- been excluded by the KARMEN experiment based on the 2 2 2 tance and ∆m21 = m2 m1. While the oscillation am- same method [38]. The MiniBooNE experiment has been plitude depends on the− mixing angle, the squared-mass built to clarify the controversial LNSD results. However, differences determine the oscillation frequency1. In the at present, MiniBooNE anti-neutrino and neutrino oscil- last decade, reactor, accelerator and solar experiments lation data combined show an excess of events at 3.8 σ have precisely measured the two mass-squared differences [39, 40]. Besides a recent re-evaluation of the electron 2 5 2 2 to be ∆m21 = (7:50 0:20) 10− eV , ∆m32 = (2:32 + anti-neutrino flux from reactors has shown a shift in the ± j j flux renormalization by 3 % compared to previous pre- dictions. The re-analysis of all reactor experiments using this new flux has shown a 3 σ inconsistency with the stan- 1 For three flavours only two independent ∆m2 can be built. Any dard oscillation framework (the "reactor anomaly") [41]. extra ∆m2 requires the addition of more mass eigenstates. These unexplained features might point to new physics sub-GeV multi-GeV 250 250 50 75 e-like e-like e-like e-like 200 p < 0.4 GeV/c 200 p > 0.4 GeV/c 40 p < 2.5 GeV/c 60 p > 2.5 GeV/c 150 150 30 45 100 100 20 30 3 50 50 10 15 0 0 0 0 neutrinos, like PINGU [52] in IceCube or ORCA [53] in 200 300 100 125 µ-like µ-like µ-like PartiallyANTARES, Contained might reach the required sensitivity to de- 160 p < 0.4 GeV/c 240 p > 0.4 GeV/c 80 100 termine the mass hierarchy. If an (extra)galactic super- nova explosion occurs, the time and energy signals of su- 120 180 60 75 pernova neutrinos will have characteristic imprints from 80 120 40 50 the mass ordering. This would be seen by a network of detectors, such as Super-Kamiokande, KamLAND [54], 40 60 20 25 Borexino [5], or by dedicated supernova observatories 0 0 0 0 like HALO [55{58] and LVD [59]; while some constitute -1 -0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.6 1 -1 -0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.6 1 -1 -0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.6 1 -1 -0.6the -0.2 "SNEWS: 0.2 0.6 SuperNova 1 Early Warning System" aim- cos cos cos cos ing at alerting observers! if a galactic supernova occurs [60].