Validation of Immune Cell Analysis in Whole Blood by Flow Cytometry For

Validation of Immune Cell Analysis in Whole Blood by Flow Cytometry For

Redx Pharma Plc Block 33 Mereside Alderley Park, Cheshire SK104TG [email protected] +44(0)1625 469937 Introduction Liquid biopsies are important samples for providing biomarkers in clinical studies in a non-invasive manner. They are particularly relevant for immuno-oncology trials, where regulation of circulating immune cells may reflect immune changes in tumours in response to immune targeting therapies. For example, RXC004, a potent and selective inhibitor of the Wnt pathway regulator porcupine is hypothesised to have immunomodulatory anti-cancer functions 1-5. Therefore as part of an RXC004 safety and tolerability study in cancer patients with solid tumours (NCT03447470), we aim develop methods to analyse immune response liquid biomarkers. This includes analysis of whole blood by flow cytometry to quantify a range of immune cell subsets and functional markers. Methods Flow cytometry analysis is carried out in house using 7 multi-colour panels, analysed on the ACEA Biosciences Novocyte 3000 flow cytometer (Fig 1). Antibodies included in these panels have been validated using healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), healthy donor whole blood and Biolegend VeriCellsTM. A B C Figure 1. Summary of immunophenotyping panels A General immune cell subsets: Exclusive expression of CD14, CD3, CD19 and CD56 identify monocytes, T and B lymphocytes and natural killer cells respectively. CD56 and CD3 co-expression identifies natural killer T cells. Granulocytes are identified based on FSC/SSC. B Dendritic cells (DCs): High expression of HLA-DR and no lineage marker (CD14/CD3/CD19/CD56) expression identifies DCs. CD11c expression within this population identifies myeloid DCs, while lack of CD11c with CD123 expression identifies plasmacytoid DCs. Further myeloid DC subsets can be separated based on exclusive expression of CD1c, CD141 and CD16. C Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs): Expression of CD33 and lack of HLA-DR and lineage marker (CD3/CD19/CD56) expression can be used together with additional markers to identify polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSCs (CD15+ CD11b+), monocytic (M)-MDSCs (CD14+ CD11b+) and early (e)MDSCs (CD14-CD15-). D E F D-F T cell subset analysis: Expression of CD3 together with exclusive expression of CD4 or CD8 identifies the main T cell subsets D Functional markers: CD69 and CD25 expression can indicate activation status, Ki67 denotes proliferating cells, and CD154 (CD40L) expression indicates activated antigen-specific T cells. CD279 (PD-1) and CD152 (CTLA-4) can indicate exhausted T cells. The activation markers make up one panel and exhaustion markers another panel. E T cell memory: CD45RA and CD45RO can be used to identify naïve and memory T cell subsets respectively. CCR7 and CD62L expression can separate further memory subsets, central (double positive) and effector (double negative). F Regulatory T cells ( ): Expression of CD25, FoxP3 and lack of CD127 expression identifies Results A PBMC Dendritic cell panel T cell memory panel validation A PBMC validation Figure 3. Healthy donor purified PBMCs enriched Figure 2. Healthy donor for naïve CD4 T cells, identified by T cell memory purified PBMCs enriched for flow cytometry panel (as shown in Fig 1E). DC populations, identified by A PBMCs stained with the panel identify a mixed DC flow cytometry panel (as population of CD4 and CD8 T cells, expressing shown in Fig 1B). CD45RA (naïve marker) and CD45RO (memory A DCs are a rare subset in B DC enrichment marker) PBMCs, and more so in whole B A magnetic bead based enrichment kit for naïve B Naïve CD4 T cell enrichment blood, making accurate gating CD4 T cells was used to validate the panel, which of sub-populations a challenge identifies only CD4 T cells expressing CD45RA E Cytotoxic T Cells B A magnetic bead based following purification. enrichment kit for specific DC subsets (CD1c mDC, CD141 mDC and pDC) was used to validate the gating strategy for DCs. Functional T cell marker A B C Healthy donor whole blood A CD3+ TD ocellsnors C D 3 B CD14+D monocytesonors CD14 100 100 s s l l Week1 Week1 l l e validation e c Whole blood samples were c 80 80 Week 3 Week 3 e e l l b b Week 6 Week 6 a a i Figure 4. Healthy donor purified PBMCs cultured in collected from 3 healthy donors i 60 60 v v + vitro to induce expression of functional markers + 5 5 40 40 4 every 3-4 weeks to generate a 4 D A-E PBMCs were cultured without stimulation (blue) D C C f f 20 20 o or with CD3/CD28 tetramer stimulation (green) and o longitudinal dataset. % % stained with the T cell activation or exhaustion 0 0 panels (as shown in Fig 1D). Stimulation for 6 hours D E F Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3 Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3 induces upregulation of activation markers CD69 (A) Samples were stained with all 7 C CD4+ T cells D CD8+ T cells and CD25 (B) but not the antigen-specific activation Donors CD4 Donors CD8 marker CD154 (C). Stimulation for 96 hours induces flow cytometry panels (Fig 1) to 100 100 expression of proliferation marker Ki67 (D) and Week1 Week1 s s 80 80 Week 3 Week 3 l l l exhaustion marker CD152 (E). assess detectable immune cell l e e c c Week 6 Week 6 60 60 + F PBMCs were cultured with superantigen toxic + 3 populations in whole blood and 3 D shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1, red) for 6 hours. D C C 40 40 f f o variability over time in healthy o Unlike CD3/CD28, TSST-1 induces upregulation of % CD154 in a small population. donors. % 20 20 G H I 0 0 G-I Naïve CD4 T cells (as shown in Fig 2B) were Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3 Donor 1 Donor 2 Donor 3 cultured without stimulation (G), with CD3/CD28/IL- Figure 5. Healthy donor whole blood immune cell subset 2 and IL-12 (H) or CD3/CD28/IL-2 and TGF-β (I) for All populations described in Fig 1 analysis by flow cytometry 96 hours then stained with the T panel (Fig 1F). REG are detectable, with the exception Healthy donor whole blood was stained with the 7 flow CD3/CD28/IL-2 stimulation induces upregulation of cytometry panels described in figure 1. The summarised data activation marker CD25, while inclusion of polarising of MDSCs, CD141 mDCs and T . REGS show stability of key immune cell subsets over time quantified cytokine TGF-β stimulates in vitro-derived T , REGS The expression levels of across multiple panels (mean+SD). indicated by CD25 and FoxP3 co-expression. A CD3+ T cells (5 panels) and B CD14+ monocytes (2 panels), as functional T cell markers are also a percentage of CD45+ viable cells (2 panels). C CD4+ T cells, T cells PBMCs low. and D CD8+ T cells (4 panels) as a percentage of CD3+ T cells. TM A 80 VeriCells ) CD3 n o i CD4 TM t 60 a Conclusion VeriCells are lyophilised unstimulated l s u CD8 l l p e or activated PBMCs, batch produced in o c p 40 t T lots with specified proportions of n e % We have established a protocol for the analysis of immune cell subsets by flow r a 20 p immune cell subsets. These cells are f cytometry, suitable to assess potential therapy-induced changes in circulating immune o included in each staining protocol as ( 0 T cells act markers cells as an exploratory end-point in patients with solid tumours enrolled in the RXC004 quality control for staining reagents and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 B 100 clinical study. CD25 ) flow cytometer performance. n s o l i 80 CD69 l t e TM a Figure 6. Biolegend VeriCells immune cell subset analysis by l c Ki67 u d flow cytometry p 60 e o t References p Stability of key immune cell subsets over 10 staining dates, a v + i t 40 quantified across multiple panels (mean+SD). 3 c D a A CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as a percentage of parent C 1. Li X et al; Front Immunol, 2019, 10:2293; 2. Phillips C et al; AACR; Cancer Res, 2019, 79(13 Suppl), Abstract nr 506; 3. Luke et al; Clin f population (4 panels) in PBMC VeriCellsTM % 20 o ( Cancer Res, 2019, 10:1158; 4. Spranger S, Gajewski T; Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2018, 18: 139-147; 5. Wang et al; Trends Pharmacol Sci., 2018, 39 B Activation marker expression on CD3+ T cells; CD25 (2 panels), (7):648-658 CD69 and Ki67 in activated PBMCs VeriCellsTM. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Staining date ELRIG Drug Discovery 2019.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us