Rocio Ir Macias Sphingoid Bases; LPC, Lysophosphatidylcholines; LPE, Rocio I.R

Rocio Ir Macias Sphingoid Bases; LPC, Lysophosphatidylcholines; LPE, Rocio I.R

SERUM METABOLITES AS DIAGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS FOR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA AND PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS J.M. BANALES1,2,3, M. IÑARRAIRAEGUI1,4, A. ARBELAIZ2, P. MILKIEWICZ5, J. MUNTANE1,6, A. LA CASTA2, L. MUÑOZ-BELLVIS7, L.M. GONZALEZ7, E. ARRETXE8, C. ALONSO8, I. MARTÍNEZ-ARRANZ8, I. MARTÍNEZ-ARRANZ8, A. LAPITZ2, A. SANTOS-LASO2, M.A. AVILA1,9, M.L. MARTINEZ-CHANTAR1,10, L. BUJANDA1,2, J.J.G. MARIN1,11, B. SANGRO1,4, R.I.R. MACIAS1,11 1 National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases (CIBERehd, Carlos III Health Institute), Madrid, Spain. 2 Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain. 3 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain. 4 Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra- IDISNA, Pamplona, Spain. 5 Liver and Internal Medicine Unit, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 6 Department of General Surgery “Virgen del Rocío” University Hospital/IBiS/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain. 7 Service of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of Salamanca, Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain. 8 OWL Metabolomics, Bizkaia Technology Park, Derio Spain. 9 Program of Hepatology, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra-IDISNA, Pamplona. 10 CIC bioGUNE, Bizkaia Technology Park, Derio, Spain. 11 Experimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEFARM), University of Salamanca, Biomedical Research Institute of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain. 1 INTRODUCTION 4 RESULTS Figure 4. Metabolic profiling workflow. (A) Metabolite extraction was Early and differential diagnosis of intrahepatic accomplished by cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and hepatocellular fractionating samples into carcinoma (HCC) by non-invasive methods pools of species with similar physicochemical Poster presented at: presented Poster represents a current clinical challenge (1,2). The properties using analysis of low-molecular weight metabolites by appropriate combinations of organic solvents. (B) new high-throughput techniques is a novel Three separate UHPLC- strategy for identifying biomarkers. MS-based platforms were B used. (C) Data pre- processing generated a list of chromatographic peak areas for the metabolites detected in each sample injection. An approximated linear detection range was defined for each identified metabolite.. (D) Once normalized, multivariate 2 and univariate data AIM C analyses were performed. (E) Selection of the best To investigate whether serum metabolome can candidate biomarkers. DOI: 10.3252/pso.eu.ILC2019.2019 provide useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of iCCA and HCC and could discriminate iCCA from HCC. Since primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a risk 5 CONCLUSIONS factor for CCA, serum metabolomic profiles of PSC and CCA have also been compared. Specific changes in serum concentrations of certain D metabolites are useful to differentiate iCCA from HCC or PSC, and could help in the early diagnosis of these diseases. 3 METHOD • Serum samples from iCCA, HCC, PSC, and Figure 2. PCA plots of human serum samples. (A) Colors represent the origin of the samples (1: Pamplona, 2: Salamanca, healthy individuals (n=20/group in the 3: San Sebastian, 4: Seville, 5: Warsaw), (B) gender, (C) age range, (D) presence or absence of cirrhosis, (E) iCCA stage E “discovery cohort” and n=14-15/group in the group, (F) HCC stage group, (G) group of sample and (H) discovery or validation cohort. Each dot represents one sample. “validation cohort”) and from non-alcoholic fatty 6 REFERENCES liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients (n=20/group) iCCA vs HCC iCCA vs PSC 1- Macias et al. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1864:1468-1477. were used. A B 2- Banales et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13: 261-80. 3- Barr et al. J Proteome Res 2012; 11: 2521-32. • Inclusion criteria for patients with iCCA and HCC included the following: 1) diagnosis Banales et al. Hepatology (in press) doi: 10.1002/hep.30319. confirmed by histopathology; 2) availability of Figure 1. Comparative serum metabolomic profiles in the discovery cohort. serum samples obtained just after diagnosis Volcano plot [-log10(p-value) and log2(fold-change)] of the serum metabolites and before patients had received any type of of iCCA patients compared to Controls (A), of HCC patients compared to treatment; and 3) availability of complete Controls (B), of iCCA patients compared to HCC patients (C), of PSC patients compared to Controls (D) and of iCCA patients compared to PSC. 7 CONTACT demographic and clinical information. AA, amino acids; AC, acylcarnitines; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BA, bile acids; Cer, ceramides; ChoE, cholesteryl esters; • Lipids and aminoacids in methanol and CMH, monohexosylceramides; DG, diglycerides; FC, fold-change; FSB, free General hepatology Rocio Ir Macias sphingoid bases; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholines; LPE, Rocio I.R. Macias chloroform/methanol serum extracts were lysophosphatidylethanolamines; LPI, lysophosphatidylinositols; MUFA, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology. Campus Miguel analysed using ultra-high performance liquid monounsaturated fatty acids; NAE, N-acyl ethanolamines; oxFA, oxidized de Unamuno E.D. Lab. B-17 chromatography (UHPLC)-Time of Flight-MS fatty acids; PC, phosphatidylcholines; PE, phosphatidylethanolamines; PI, phosphatidylinositols; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SEN, sensitivity; Figure 3. Diagnostic prediction capacity of the selected metabolites in iCCA vs HCC, and iCCA vs PSC in discovery and validation cohorts. (A) 37007-Salamanca, Spain based platforms (3). SFA, saturated fatty acids; SM, sphingomyelins; SPE, specificity; ST, steroids; Combination of aspartic acid, glycine, SM(42:3) and SM(43:2) in serum iCCA vs HCC. (B) Combination of histidine and PC(34:3) in serum Telephone: 34-666 596 621 E-mail: [email protected] TG, triglycerides. iCCA vs PSC; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity. SAT-425 ILC2019.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us