Soil Management Requirements KSLA November 22, 2011

Soil Management Requirements KSLA November 22, 2011

Soil management requirements KSLA November 22, 2011 by Mats Olsson Department of Soil and Environment, SLU matlts.olsson@ @lslu.se Land use and land management must be sustainable That means e.g. • All ecosystem services have to be considered in a long term ppperspective Land use and land management must be sustainable That means e.g. • All ecosystem services has to be considered in a long term ppperspective • Use and management must be site adapted Soil is a diverse concept – and so is soil management Cryosols Leptosols Cambisols Arenosols Acrisols Calcisols Ferralsols Properties are set by: Gleyso ls Luvisols Podzols Kastanozems Lixisols 1. Topography Fluvisols Histosols 2. Climate Vertisols Albeluvisols Regosols 3. Geology Solonchaks Chernozems 4. Biota and land use Alisols Nitisols 5. Time Phaeozems Stagnosols Solonetz Planosols Andosols Gypsisols Umbrisols Global: 15 300 Mha Plinthosols Durisols Technosols From: World Reference Base for Anthrosols Soil Resources, 2006 Land use and land management must be sustainable That means e.g. • All ecosystem services has to be considered in a long term ppperspective • Use and management must be site adapted • A system analyses ppperspective should be applied Wheat production at different N fertilizing rates, SdSweden, k/h*kg/ha*yr From Lennart Mattsson, 2004 Wheat production at different N fertilizing rates, SdSweden, k/h*kg/ha*yr • Low margilinal impact on production • High negative environmental consequences From Lennart Mattsson, 2004 Fertilizer use, kg perha*yr Netherlands Vietnam Japan UK China France Brazil USA India South Africa Cuba Benin MlMalaw i Ethiopia Mali Burkina Faso NiNiger ia Tanzania Mozambique Guinea Ghana Uganda 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Kg/ha Source: FAOSTAT, July 2003; Norman Borlaug, 2004 MtManagment catitegories Soils not suitable for production; cold climate, erosion potential and/or should be protected for other reasons (provision of other ecosystem services) 17 % Soils with too much water; high groundwater table, poor drainage and/or too much ppprecipitation Soils with too low water availability; drought, low water retention capacity, thin soils Fertile soils with good nutrient availablity, good structure and good water retention Poor soils with low nutrient availabilty; caused by climate, mineralogy and/or age Soils not suitable for production % area Cryosols 11.8 Too cold (with permafrost) – extensive grazing Leptosols 10.8 Too thin, and erosion sensitive – extensive forestry, agroforestry Plin thoso ls 040.4 TilTropical soilswith hdhard subilbsoil –extitensive grazing or forestry SUM > 23 Data from World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006 Too much water – drainage needed % area Fluvisols 2.3 Flooded soils. Good natural fertility Gleysols 4.7 High groundwater table Stagnosols 1.1 (Pseudogley) Dense subsoil prevents drainage. Rather fertile. Drainage/deep ploughing needed. Planosols 090.9 Dense subsoil prevents natural drainage. Drainage and fertilisation needed Histosols 2.3 Peat soils (bogs and fens). Fertilisation needed. SUM 11.3 Data from World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006 Too low moisture availability – irrigation needed % area Chernozem 1.5 Fertile. P fertilization recommended Kastanozem 303.0 Fertile Calcisols 6.0 Fertilization needed Solonetz 090.9 Fertilization and liming needed Solonchak 1.7 Strong irrigation and fertilization needed Durisols 0.3 Strong irrigation – otherwise grazing Gypsisol 0.7 Arenosols 8.5 Strong fertilization – otherwise forestry SUM 22.6 Water availability Unmanaged Grazed Cultivated Naturally fertile agricultural soils, inherited high nutrient contents % area Cambisols 9.8 Vertisols 2.2 Phaeozem 1.2 Luvisols 3.6 Andosols 0.7 P fertilization may be needed Nitisols 1.3 P fertilization may be needed SUM 19.5 Data from World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006 Nutrient poor soils, inherited or highly weathere d. SiSuita ble for forestry and, if idimproved, agriculture % area Needed for agricultural use Ferralsols 4.9 weathered tropical soils – P and fertilizers needed, OM AilAcrisols 666.6 weathere d tiltropical soils–PdP and fer tilizers needdded, OM Alisols 1.3 Tropical soil - Al-toxicity – liming and fertilization Lixisols 282.8 Tropical soil – fertilization, OM Albeluvisols 2.1 Liming and fertilizers Podzols 3.2 Liming and fertilizers Umbrisols 0.7 Liming and fertilizers Regosol 1.7 Diverse group – needs fertilizers, OM, irregation SUM 23.3 Nutrient availability Forestry Farm land Spring wheat production data for two regions in Ethiopi a, k/h*kg/ha*yr 3000 2500 2000 North Shewa Zone 1500 1000 South Wollo Zone 500 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 From Gizaw Mengistu, data from Central Statistic Agency, Ethiopia 200 Experiments with fertilization on an Andosol in south-central Ethiopia rol) tt 150 to con ee 100 relativ %% BABC rain ( rain gg 50 Maize 0 Compost Compost/ Fertilizer Control fertilizer From: Workneh Bedada, Mulugeta Leminih, Motuma Tolera & Erik Karltun THE TIGRAY PROJECT: A Success Story in Sustainable Agriculture From: Hailu Araya & Sue Edwards The main aim of the project is to find out if a community-based approach to rehabilitating the land and improving crop production based on ecological principles can improve the livelihoods of poor smallholder farmers. Managed by the Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources ( BoANR)of) of Tigray Regional State and the Institute for Sustainable Development (ISD) in collaboration with the woreda administrations and experts, andhild their local communi iities. The Tigray project: Relative production rate; controll = 100 250 200 150 Controll Compost 100 Fertilizer Manure 50 0 Barley Maize Teff Wheat From: Hailu Araya & Sue Edwards Variation between villages, wheat kg/ha*yr From: Hailu Araya & Sue Edwards Ex. on soils that may best be used for forestry: Leptosols Plinthosols Acrisols Alisols Lixisols Albeluvisols Podzols Regosols Arenosols The annual increment of stem volume in stands of young Norway spruce ( Flakaliden, N. Sweden). From Bergh et al 1999 Control (open circle) Irrigation ( open triangle ) Solid fertilisation (filled circle) Combined irrigation and fertilisation (filled triangle). Eucalyptus plantation in Brazil: 50 mmy3/ha*yr (Acrisols) Soil: Alisols Site preparation NPK added 200-600 kg N/ha per rotation (5 years) Lime Herbicides Insecticides CONCLUSIONS Soils are different – different management All ecosystem services has to be considered in a long-term perspective Use and management must be site adapted A system analyses perspective should be applied Agricultural yields on many soils in developing countries may get doubled or tripled production rates provided idimproved soil management Higher effiency in using fertilizers in developing countries than in developed countries.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us