Quantum Wigner Entropy

Quantum Wigner Entropy

Quantum Wigner entropy Zacharie Van Herstraeten1, ∗ and Nicolas J. Cerf1, † 1Centre for Quantum Information and Communication, École polytechnique de Bruxelles, CP 165/59, Université libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium We define the Wigner entropy of a quantum state as the differential Shannon entropy of the Wigner function of the state. This quantity is properly defined only for states that possess a positive Wigner function, which we name Wigner-positive states, but we argue that it is a proper measure of quan- tum uncertainty in phase space. It is invariant under symplectic transformations (displacements, rotations, and squeezing) and we conjecture that it is lower-bounded by ln π+1 within the convex set of Wigner-positive states. It reaches this lower bound for Gaussian pure states, which are natural minimum-uncertainty states. Our conjecture implies the entropic uncertainty relation and bears a resemblance with the Wehrl-Lieb conjecture, and we prove it over the subset of passive states of the harmonic oscillator which are of particular relevance in quantum thermodynamics. Along the way, we present a simple technique to build a broad class of phase-invariant Wigner-positive states exploiting an optical beam splitter and reveal an unexpectedly simple convex decomposition of extremal passive states. The Wigner entropy is anticipated to be a significant physical quantity, for example in quantum optics where it allows us to establish a Wigner entropy-power inequality. I. INTRODUCTION However, it is well known that the Wigner function is not a true probability distribution since it lacks positiveness. The phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics For example, all pure non-Gaussian states have a Wigner provides a complete framework that echoes classical sta- function that admits negative regions as a consequence tistical mechanics. Quantum states and quantum opera- of Hudson theorem [3]. This is the price to pay to the tors are described within this formulation by continuous uncertainty principle, which forbids the joint definition functions of the pair of canonical variables x and p. These of non-commuting variables x and p. Hence, some func- variables traditionally refer to the position and momen- tionals of probability distributions, such as the Shannon tum observables, but are also isomorphic to the conjugate differential entropy, become in general ill-defined if ap- quadrature components of a mode of the electromagnetic plied to Wigner functions. field (we use this quantum optics nomenclature in the In contrast, there exists a well-known distribution in present paper). The conversion from quantum operators quantum phase space that behaves as a genuine proba- to quantum phase-space distributions is carried out via bility distribution, namely the Husimi Q-function [2], de- the Wigner-Weyl transform [1], which maps any linear fined as Q α α ρ^ α π. It corresponds to the prob- ρ^ α operator A^ into a distribution A x; p as ability to measure state in a coherent state . Re- member that( ) a= coherent⟨ S S ⟩ ~ state α is an eigenstate of the 1 a^ x^ ip^ 2 S ⟩ α A x; p exp 2ipy h (x y) A^ x y dy; (1) annihilation operator with eigenvalue . πh Splitting the complex parameterS ⟩α√into two real param- ̵ eters x and p such that =α( x+ ip) ~gives where( h )denotes= ̵ S the Planck( ~ constant)⟨ − S (weS + set⟩ h 1 in the remainder of this paper). Accordingly, the Wigner 1 ̵ ̵ = Q x; p =x +ip ρ^ x ip : (3) function of a quantum state is the Wigner-Weyl trans- π form of its density operator ρ^, written as W x; p . The Wigner function comes as close to a probability distri- Despite lacking( the) nice= properties⟨ + S S of+ Wigner⟩ functions bution in phase space as allowed by quantum( mechanics.) such as the overlap formula (2), the Husimi function has It indeed shares most properties of a classical probabil- the advantage of being positive, hence it has a properly ity distribution. Notably, the marginal distributions of defined entropy. The Shannon differential entropy of the W x; p coincide with the probability distributions for x Husimi function is indeed known as the Wehrl entropy and p, respectively ρx x x ρ^ x and ρp p p ρ^ p , and is defined as h Q Q x; p ln Q x; p dx dp. as( it can) easily be shown that W x; p dp ρx x and This entropy is at the core of the Wehrl conjecture [4], W x; p dx ρp p .( Also,) = ⟨ theS expectationS ⟩ ( value) = ⟨ ofS anyS ⟩ ( ) = − ( ) ( ) arXiv:2105.12843v1 [quant-ph] 26 May 2021 later proven by Lieb [5,6], which∬ states that the Wehrl operator A^ in state ρ^ is straightforwardly∫ ( ) computed= ( ) from entropy is lower-bounded by ln π 1 and that the only its∫ Wigner( ) function= ( ) through the overlap formula [2]: minimizers of h Q are the coherent states. Interestingly, there is a link between+ the Husimi func- A^ Tr A^ ρ^ 2π A x; p W x; p dx dp: (2) tion and Wigner( function) of a state, as can simply be un- derstood using the quantum optics language. To this pur- ⟨ ⟩ = = U ( ) ( ) pose, recall that the vacuum state 0 [or ground state of the harmonic oscillator H^ p^2 x^2 2 in natural units] ∗ [email protected] S ⟩ 2 2 † [email protected] admits the Wigner function W0 x; p exp x p π. = + ~ ( ) = − − ~ 2 AppendixA). In general, we will denote the quantum states admitting a positive Wigner function [i.e., states such that W x; p 0, x; p] as Wigner-positive states. For such states, it is possible to compute the Shannon differential entropy( ) ≥ of their∀ Wigner function. We make the leap and define the Wigner entropy of any Wigner- positive state ρ^ as FIG. 1. Reduced output state σ^ of a balanced beam splitter (of transmittance η = 1~2) when the input state is ρ^, as de- h W W x; p ln W x; p dx dp (8) scribed in Eq. (7). The Wigner function of σ^ coincides with the Husimi Q-function of ρ^, hence it is positive. Consequently, where ( ) = − U ( ) ( ) the Wigner entropy of σ^ is equal to the Wehrl entropy of ρ^. 1 W x; p exp 2ipy x y ρ^ x y dy (9) π α Since a coherent state is a displaced vacuum state, is the Wigner( ) function= S of (ρ^. We)⟨ argue− S that,S + although⟩ it W x; p W x′; p′ its Wigner function is then α 0 , where is limited to Wigner-positive states, the Wigner entropy ′ S ⟩′ x x 2 Re α and p p 2 Im α . Using this, is the natural measure in order to characterize quantum ( ) = ( ) the Husimi√ function can be expressed√ from the overlap uncertainty in phase space : it bears information about = − ( ) = − ( ) formula (2) as: the joint uncertainty of the marginal distributions of the 1 x and p variables as well as their correlations in phase Q x; p Tr x ip x ip ρ^ π space. In contrast with the Wehrl entropy, it is not the classical entropy of the outcome of a specific measure- ( ) = 2 [SW+0 x~⟩⟨ +2x;Sp~ ] 2p W x;~ p~ d~x d~p: (4) ment, namely a joint x; p measurement (called het- √ √ erodyne detection or eight-port homodyne detection in Thus, it= appearsU that Q− is a convolution− between( ) W and quantum optics). Of course,( ) in the special case where the W0, with a rescaling factor of 2. In the language of Wigner-positive state can be prepared using the setup of random variables (and provided√W is non-negative), we Figure1, its Wigner entropy can be viewed simply as the could say that if x;~ p~ is distributed according to W Wehrl entropy of the corresponding input state, but the and x0; p0 is distributed according to W0, then x; p definition goes further and the Wigner entropy remains is distributed according( ) to Q, with relevant for Wigner-positive states that cannot be built ( ) ( ) in this way. x x~ x0 2 and p p~ p0 2: (5) The Wigner entropy h W enjoys interesting proper- √ √ ties. Firstly, unlike the Wehrl entropy h Q , it is in- This is a familiar= ( − relation) ~ in quantum= ( − optics,) ~ describing variant under symplectic( transformations) (displacement, η 1 2 the action of a beam-splitter of transmittance rotation, and squeezing) in phase space. Such( ) transfor- ρ^ σ^ onto the state and the vacuum state. Defining as mations, which are ubiquitous in quantum optics, corre- = ~ the reduced state of the corresponding output of the spond to the set of all Gaussian unitaries in state space. beam-splitter, as shown in Figure1, we conclude that We stress that a sensible measure of phase-space uncer- σ^ the Wigner function of is precisely the Husimi function tainty must remain invariant under symplectic transfor- ρ^ of , namely mations, since these are also area-preserving transforma- tions in phase space. In contrast, h Q is greater for Wσ^ x; p Qρ^ x; p (6) squeezed states than for coherent states. As it can be where ( ) = ( ) understood from Fig.1, this preference( simply) originates from the fact that one input of the balanced beam-splitter ^ ^ † is itself a coherent state. Secondly, the Wigner entropy σ^ Tr2 U 1 ρ^ 0 0 U 1 : (7) 2 2 h W can be related to the entropy of the marginal dis- tributions h ρx and h ρp , but also encompasses the ^ = ( ⊗ S ⟩⟨ S) Here U 1 denotes the beam-splitter unitary of transmit- 2 x-(p correlations.) Shannon information theory establishes tance η 1 2, while Tr2 denotes a reduced trace over one a relation between( ) the entropy( ) of a joint distribution and of the modes, say the second mode.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us