Appendix 'A' - Final Summary List of NPR Submissions and Responses Secondary Property Address Submission Date Existing Land Proposed Existing Proposed Comment Comment Summary Staff Response Date Staff Who Formal Staff Response Date Staff Who Description of Change/Rationale for No Action Plan and Received Use Land Use Zone Zone Response Responded Response Responded Change Required? Response # Provided Provided All Various 64 10/11/2019 N/A N/A N/A N/A What is the area please? I own a few different properties. Inquiry requesting information. Good morning, 10/15/2019 Preet No further response required. N/A N/A None required. No The notice is for all seven secondary plan areas. Please visit www.kitchener.ca/NPR for detailed information on each secondary plan which include land use, zoning, cultural heritage landscape maps, related policy documents and background information. Thank you, Preet Cedar Hill 119 Cedar Street 12 10/25/2019 Low Rise Low Rise R-5 RES-5 Called to get more information on zoning. Inquiry requesting information. The existing zoning of your property is R-5 and proposed 10/25/2019 Preet No further response required. N/A N/A No changes are recommended to be made No and Conservation Residential zoning RES-5. Have a look at the comparison table and to the proposed land use designation and Schneider feel free to let me know if you have any questions. zone category to be applied to 119 Cedar Creek Street South. Cedar Hill 63 Courtland 18 11/2/2019 Low Rise Mixed Use CR-1 130R MIX-1(168) I was reviewing the proposed secondary plan & I notice Inquiry requesting more information. We have been doing some further modelling work and 11/15/2019 Tina MW Further information provided. Response Tina MW With the new proposed height and setback Yes and Avenue East Commercial 63 courtland has a mixed use designation right up to are proposing to recommend some changes to the MIX Document requirements for developments in a MIX Schneider Residential martin street. I thought that the planning department's base zones to accommodate transitions on the subject zone from a low rise residential zone, Creek intention was to restore the residential status of the properties where they abut low rise residential uses. The Planning staff will review to see if additional property abutting martin street in keeping with cultural Mixed Use land use designation and zone permits site-specific zoning regulations are required heritage landscape. I know in meetings downtown I had residential uses and their setback and height will be for the property, addressed as 63 Courtland the impression that there was to be a distinct separation regulated from Martin Street to ensure a compatible built Avenue East, to ensure an appropriate built between the courtland side of the property and the side form and transition. The new MIX regulations are a form is achieved on the site while minimizing that abuts martin street. Can you clarify the planning definite improvement to what currently exists with the impacts on the adjacent low rise department 's intentions? transitions in our existing "CR" Zones. It is challenging residential uses. to split zone an individual property and determine where exactly that zone boundary line should be in the absence of a surveyed "legal" boundary. Cedar Hill 65 Peter Street 21 11/22/2019 Low Rise Low Rise R-5 RES-3 Hi, the owners writing this letter would like specific Inquiry requesting further information. Concern about Thank you for your email and for your feedback on the 11/29/2019 Preet No further response required. N/A N/A No changes are recommended to be made. No and Conservation Residential (159)(160) answers to the following: losing a portion of their property to Sandhills Park. Neighbourhood Planning Review. Please note that you A similar land use designation and zone Schneider Limited are not losing any of your backyard and driveway land category, to what currently exists now, with Creek First and obvious is we DO NOT wish to lose ANY of our through secondary plan review. The City of Kitchener added site-specifics provisions to regulate backyard and driveway land at our property 65 Peter has the ownership of the laneway to Sandhills. the location of attached/detached Street!!! garage/carport and the requirement for a Below is the land use and zoning information for the front porch, is proposed to be applied to 65 After reading/scanning the approximately 100 pages on property addressed as 65 Peter Street as requested Peter Street. the website, we, at 65 Peter Street, need much more below: specific clarification as to this proposal of zoning - Existing Land use is Low Rise Conservation changes!!?? We will be sending detailed comments - Existing Zoning is R-5 before the meeting on December 9 and also will be - The proposed land use is Low Rise Residential Limited. attending the meeting on the same day. - The proposed zoning is RES-3 (159), (160) - Site specific text: (159): Within the lands zoned RES-3, Please e-mail us with specific answers to OUR RES-4 and RES-5 and shown as affected by this land/zoning, as mentioned above, at your earliest provision in Appendix A, an attached private garage or convenience. detached private garage shall be located 5.5 metres behind the front façade of the principal building. (160): Within the lands zoned RES-3, RES-4 and RES-5 and shown as affected by this provision in Appendix A, a new single detached dwelling, new semi-detached dwelling or new street townhouse dwelling shall include a porch on at least one street line façade and in aCivic Centreordance with Section 4.14.7. Here is the link to the pdf showing the comparison between existing and proposed residential zones with respect to permitted uses and regulations.We have included your contact information on our notification list Cedar Hill 72 Peter Street 34 10/17/2019 Low Rise Low Rise R-5 RES-3 I received the letter regarding the planning for Cedar Hill Inquiry requesting information. hank you for your email and for your interest in the 10/25/2019 Tina MW Further: Response Tina MW No changes are recommended to be made. No and Conservation Residential (159)(160) and Schneider Creek, I am concerned regarding my Neighbourhood Planning Review. The property is currently zoned “R-5”. The R-5 zoning Document A similar land use designation and zone Schneider Limited property as it clearly doesn't fit into any of the I have attached a link to a document which compares currently allows up to a multiple dwelling with 3 dwelling category, to what currently exists now, with Creek measurements stated. There is barely enough land for existing residential zones with the proposed new units. With the new Planning Act regulations which added site-specifics provisions to regulate the house, let alone parking. Last year I received a letter residential zones. ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ came into effect last year, Planning staff are required to the location of attached/detached saying that the city was considering making Peter St a https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Document‐ ‐ ‐ implement zoning which will permit a single detached garage/carport and the requirement for a one way street with parking, is this still a possibility? I s/DSD_PLAN_DSD 19 233 Appendix Gcomparison of R dwelling and 2 additional dwelling units, either 2 front porch, is proposed to be applied to 72 would be happy to sell to the city if space is needed to ES and R zones.pdf ‐ additional attached, or one additional attached and one Peter Street. accommodate changes and parking for the ‐ additional detached. A lot will have to have a minimum neighborhood. Your property is currently zoned “R 5” and is proposed lot area and frontage in order to be able to to be zoned new “RES 3”. The size requirements for a accommodate additional dwelling units, attached and single detached dwelling are not proposing to change. detached. Accordingly, all lots have been given the With respect to the Peter Street reconstruction I would new comparable zone to R-5 and are proposed to be suggest contacting Yam Bhattachan, Engineering zoned new RES-3. Services, for information/questions related to the Peter Street reconstruction. New Site-Specific Provision (159) requires an attached/detached garage or carport to be located a Thank you for your comments with respect to the sale of minimum distance of 5.5 metres from the front façade your property. I will include them in the public record and of the dwelling and new Site-Specific Provision (160) for future consideration by the City. requires new dwellings to provide a front porch. The new zoning is comparable to the existing zoning with the additional requirements to regulate the location of attached/detached parking structures and the requirement for a front porch on new construction in order to enhance and protect the character of the streetscape. Cedar Hill 137 Church Street 36 10/18/2019 Low Rise Low Rise R-5 RES-3 May I please be given specific information if the Cedar Inquiry requesting information and concern with respect Your property, 137 Church Street, is within Cedar Hill 10/22/2019 Preet Further information provided. Response Tina MW No changes are recommended to be made. No and Conservation Residential (159) (160) Hill and Schneider Creek Project will impact my home at to off-street parking. and Schneider Creek Secondary Plan area. You are‐ Document A similar land use designation and zone Schneider Limited 137 Church Street, where I have been living for 34 encouraged to visit the page for detailed‐ information.