Evaluation of UNDP's Earthquake Programme Final Report (Draft) Javed A.Malik (Team Leader) Salma Omar Krishna Vatsa December 2008 Table of contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... - 4 - SECTION ONE: OVER ALL EVALUATION SUMMERY ........................................................... - 5 - 1. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... - 6 - 2. SCOPE AND RATIONALE OF THE EVALUATION.............................................................................. - 6 - 3. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF ANALYSIS ............................................................................ - 7 - 4. TOOLS USED FOR THE EVALUATION EXERCISE ............................................................................. - 9 - 5. FINDINGS........................................................................................................................... - 11 - Relief Phase ...................................................................................................................... - 11 - Early Recovery .................................................................................................................. - 14 - SECTION TWO: PROJECT WISE ANALYSIS ......................................................................... - 17 - OVERALL COORDINATION IN THE INITIAL PHASE ........................................................................... - 18 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 18 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 18 - Efficiency ......................................................................................................................... - 19 - Change Factor .................................................................................................................. - 19 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 20 - COOKING AND HEATING PROJECT ..................................................................................... - 21 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 21 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 21 - Efficiency ......................................................................................................................... - 22 - Change ............................................................................................................................ - 22 - Evaluations, Guidelines and Gaps ......................................................................................... - 22 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 22 - EMERGENCY AND TRANISTIONAL SHELTER ..................................................................... - 24 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 24 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 24 - Efficiency ......................................................................................................................... - 25 - Change ............................................................................................................................ - 25 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 25 - RUBBLE REMOVAL ............................................................................................................ - 27 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 27 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 27 - Efficiency ......................................................................................................................... - 27 - RECOVERY PHASE .............................................................................................................. - 28 - EARLY RECOVERY CLUSTER AND UNDP'S ROLE ........................................................................... - 29 - DETAILED EVALUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ - 29 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 29 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 30 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 31 - TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR MANAGEMENT OF EARTHQUAKE EARLY RECOVERY (TAMEER) .............. - 32 - DETAILED EVALUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ - 32 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 32 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 33 - Efficiency and Change ........................................................................................................ - 35 - Sustainability .................................................................................................................... - 36 - Other Evaluations and Lessons Learnt ................................................................................... - 37 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 38 - BEGIN-ER ........................................................................................................................... - 39 - DETAILED EVALUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ - 39 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 39 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 40 - Efficiency ......................................................................................................................... - 42 - Change ............................................................................................................................ - 44 - - 2 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 44 - COMMUNITY BASED LIVELIHOOD RECOVERY PROGRAM ................................................................. - 45 - DETAILED EVALUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ - 45 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 45 - Effectiveness & Efficiency.................................................................................................... - 47 - Change ............................................................................................................................ - 53 - Sustainability .................................................................................................................... - 54 - Recommendation ............................................................................................................... - 55 - SUPPORT TO VOLUNTEERISM IN PAKISTAN ................................................................................... - 57 - DETAILED EVALUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ - 58 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 58 - Efficiency ......................................................................................................................... - 58 - Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................... - 59 - Change ............................................................................................................................ - 60 - Recommendations .............................................................................................................. - 60 - ENVIRONMENT RECOVERY PROGRAMME (ERP) ................................................................ - 61 - DETAILED EVALUATION ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ - 61 - Relevance ......................................................................................................................... - 61 - Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................