2011 Annual Report to the Legislature

2011 Annual Report to the Legislature

2011 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PREPARED BY THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOISE PROGRAM OFFICE MARCH 2012 2011 Annual Report to the Legislature Metropolitan Airports Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.0 OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN ...................................... 6 2 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) ..................................... 7 2.0 OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 MSP AIRPORT FACILITIES ................................................................................................ 8 2.1.1 Airfield ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Terminal 1- Lindbergh ............................................................................................... 10 7 2.1.3 Terminal 2-Humphrey ................................................................................................ 11 2.1.4 Light Rail and Bus Transit ........................................................................................ 14 2.1.5 MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Update ......................................................... 14 2.1.6 MSP 2020 Environmental Assessment ...................................................................... 14 2.2 AIRPORT ACTIVITY AND SERVICE TRENDS ................................................................. 23 2.2.1 Passenger Originations/Destinations and Connections ............................................. 25 2.2.2 Annual Revenue Passengers ................................................................................... 26 2.2.3 Annual Aircraft Operations ....................................................................................... 27 2.2.4 Non-stop Markets ..................................................................................................... 28 2.3 COMPARISON OF MSP FORECASTED ACTIVITY WITH ACTUAL ACTIVITY ............... 32 2.4 AIRPORT CAPACITY AND DELAY ................................................................................... 37 2.4.1 Airfield Capacity ........................................................................................................ 37 2.4.2 Airfield Delay ............................................................................................................ 38 2.5 TECHNOLOGICAL / CAPACITY ENHANCEMENTS ........................................................ 44 2.5.1 Precision Instrument Approaches .............................................................................. 45 2.6 STEWARDS OF TOMORROW'S AIRPORT RESOURCES (STAR) PROGRAM .............. 46 3 RELIEVER AIRPORTS ................................................................................................ 48 3.0 OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 48 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF RELIEVER AIRPORT FACILITIES ..................................................... 48 3.1.1 Airlake Airport (LVN) ................................................................................................. 48 3.1.2 Anoka County-Blaine Airport (ANE) .......................................................................... 50 3.1.3 Crystal Airport (MIC) ................................................................................................. 50 3.1.4 Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) ....................................................................................... 50 3.1.5 Lake Elmo Airport (21D) ........................................................................................... 54 3.1.6 St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP) .............................................................................. 54 3.2 HISTORIC AND FORECAST ACTIVITY LEVELS ............................................................. 57 3.3 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS .......................................................................................... 61 3.3.1 Airlake Airport (LVN) ................................................................................................. 61 3.3.2 Anoka County-Blaine Airport (ANE) .......................................................................... 61 3.3.3 Crystal Airport (MIC) ................................................................................................. 62 3.3.4 Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) ....................................................................................... 62 3.3.5 Lake Elmo Airport (21D) ........................................................................................... 62 3.3.6 St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP) .............................................................................. 63 2 2011 Annual Report to the Legislature Metropolitan Airports Commission LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Existing Airport Facilities ........................................................................................... 9 Table 2.2: MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW Alternative 1 - Airlines Remain ........................ 16 Table 2.3: MSP 2020 Improvements EA /EAW Alternative 2 - Airlines Relocate ..................... 18 Table 2.4: MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW No Action Alternative ....................................... 20 Table 2.5: MSP Revenue Passenger Summary ....................................................................... 24 Table 2.6: MSP Revenue Passenger Market Share ................................................................. 24 Table 2.7: Non-stop Markets by Metropolitan Area .................................................................. 30 Table 2.8: Comparison of Capacity and Delay ......................................................................... 37 Table 2.9: Top 15 Large Hub Airports with Highest Average Total Delay per Operation .......... 43 Table 2.10: Precision Instrument Approaches ........................................................................... 45 Table 3.1: Historical View of Based Aircraft at MAC Reliever Airports ..................................... 58 Table 3.2: Historical View of Operations at MAC Reliever Airports .......................................... 59 Table 3.3: Summary of Based Aircraft Forecast at MAC Reliever Airports 2010-2025............. 60 Table 3.4: Summary of Forecast Operations at MAC Reliever Airports 2010-2025 ................. 60 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: MAC Airports in the Seven-County Metropolitan Area Figure 2-1: Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Layout Figure 2-2: Terminal 1-Lindbergh Figure 2-3: Terminal 2-Humphrey Figure 2-4: MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW Alternative 1 - Airlines Remain Figure 2-5: MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW Alternative 2 - Airlines Relocate Figure 2-6: MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW No Action Alternative Figure 2-7: Annual Passenger Origination/Destination Totals, 1990-2011 Figure 2-8: Total Annual Revenue Passengers, 1990-2011 Figure 2-9: Annual Aircraft Operations, 1990-2011 Figure 2-10: Number of Non-stop Markets, 2004-2011 Figure 2-11: Non-stop Markets by Type of Aircraft, 2011 Figure 2-12: Population vs. Non-stop Service, 2011 Figure 2-13: Forecast vs. Actual 2011 Passenger Originations/Destinations, MSP Figure 2-14: Forecast vs. Actual 2011 Total Revenue Passengers, MSP Figure 2-15: Forecast vs. Actual 2011 Total Aircraft Operations, MSP Figure 2-16: MSP Flights Delayed by ATC 2002-2011 Figure 2-17: On-time Gate Arrivals, MSP vs. National Average, 2002-2011 Figure 2-18: MSP Average Delay Per Aircraft Operation, 2002-2011 Figure 3-1: Airlake Airport Layout Figure 3-2: Anoka County-Blaine Airport Layout Figure 3-3: Crystal Airport Layout Figure 3-4: Flying Cloud Airport Layout Figure 3-5: Lake Elmo Airport Layout Figure 3-6: St. Paul Downtown Airport Layout 3 2011 Annual Report to the Legislature Metropolitan Airports Commission 1. INTRODUCTION 1.0 OVERVIEW The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) was created in 1943 by the Minnesota Legislature to promote air transportation in the seven-county metropolitan area. The MAC’s 15-member board of commissioners consists of 13 appointments by Minnesota's Governor and one appointment each by the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul and sets the MAC’s policies. Those policies are implemented by the MAC's executive director and staff. The MAC airport system is comprised of seven airports: Minneapolis-St. Paul International and six reliever airports. The reliever airports include Airlake, Anoka County-Blaine, Crystal, Flying Cloud, Lake Elmo and St. Paul Downtown. Figure 1-1 shows each MAC airport location. In 1989, the Minnesota Legislature adopted the Metropolitan Airport Planning Act. This legislation required the MAC and the Metropolitan Council (MC) to complete a comprehensive and coordinated program to plan for major airport development in the Twin Cities. The planning activities were designed to compare the option of expanding Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP) at its current site with the option of building a new airport elsewhere. The analysis was completed in 1996, and the MAC and the MC formally submitted their recommendations to the Legislature on March 18, 1996. On April 2, 1996, legislation was passed by both the House and Senate and signed by Governor

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    63 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us