18CV337830 Santa Clara – Civil 1 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Electronically Filed Richard B. Lapp (SBN 271052) by Superior Court of CA, 2 E-mail: [email protected] County of Santa Clara, Camille A. Olson (SBN 111919) 3 E-mail: [email protected] on 4/2/2019 5:14 PM Robin E. Devaux (SBN 233444) Reviewed By: R. Walker 4 E-mail: [email protected] Case #18CV337830 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor Envelope: 2709539 5 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 6 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 7 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Jeffrey A. Wortman (SBN 180781) 8 E-mail: [email protected] 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3300 9 Los Angeles, California 90017-5793 Telephone: (213) 270-9600 10 Facsimile: (213) 270-9601 11 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Reiko Furuta (SBN 169206) 12 E-mail: [email protected] 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 13 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 14 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 17 18 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 19 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 20 R. ROSS and C. ROGUS, individually and on Case No. 18 CV 337830 behalf of all others similarly situated, 21 DEFENDANT HEWLETT PACKARD Plaintiffs, ENTERPRISE COMPANY’S 22 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND v. AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 23 DEMURRER HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 24 COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, (formerly Date: June 28, 2019 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY), Time: 9:00 a.m. 25 Department: 1 Defendant. 26 Complaint Filed: November 8, 2018 Trial Date: Not Set 27 28 DEFENDANT HPE’S MPA IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER / CASE NO. 18 CV 337830 53729353v.12 1 TABLE OF CONTENT 2 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 4 II. RELEVANT BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 2 5 III. ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 3 6 A. Legal Standard .................................................................................................................... 3 7 1. A Complaint Is Subject To Demurrer Where It Fails To State Facts Sufficient To Constitute A Cause Of Action .......................................................... 3 8 2. The Class Issue May Properly Be Disposed Of By Demurrer Because The 9 Invalidity Of Plaintiffs’ Class Allegations Is Revealed On The Face Of The Complaint. ....................................................................................................... 4 10 B. Plaintiffs Cannot Sustain Their Claims Premised On Allegations Made “On 11 Information And Belief.” .................................................................................................... 4 12 C. Plaintiffs’ Allegations Regarding The Elements of Labor Code Sec. 1197.5 Do Not Meet California’s Minimum Pleading Standard .......................................................... 6 13 1. Plaintiffs’ Individual Fair Pay and Equal Pay Act Claims Fail .............................. 6 14 2. Plaintiffs’ Fair Pay And Equal Pay Act Claims Fail On A Class-Wide 15 Basis. ....................................................................................................................... 8 16 3. Plaintiffs’ Remaining Claims Are Derivative of the FPA and EPA Claims........... 9 17 D. Plaintiffs’ Class Allegations Do Not Meet California’s Minimum Pleading Standard ............................................................................................................................ 10 18 1. Plaintiffs Fail To Allege Facts That Demonstrate The Common Questions 19 Of Law And Fact Predominate ............................................................................. 10 20 2. Plaintiffs Fail to Allege Facts That Show Their Claims Are Typical ................... 14 21 IV. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 15 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i DEFENDANT HPE’S MPA IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER / CASE NO. 18 CV 337830 53729353v.12 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Page(s) 3 Federal Cases 4 Banawis-Olila v. World Courier Ground, Inc., 2016 WL 2957131 (N.D. Cal. May 23, 2016) .......................................................................................7 5 Beauperthuy v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc., 6 2007 WL 707475 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2007)........................................................................................11 7 Becker v. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., 8 10 Fed. App’x. 135 (4th Cir. 2001) ...................................................................................................8, 9 9 Carey v. Foley & Lardner LLP, 577 Fed. App’x 573 (6th Cir. 2014) ..............................................................................................7, 8, 9 10 E.E.O.C. v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 11 768 F.3d 247 (2d Cir. 2014)...................................................................................................................8 12 Foco v. Freudenberg NOK-General Partnership, 13 892 F.Supp.2d 871 (6th Cir. 2012) ........................................................................................................9 14 Forsberg v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co., 840 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir. 1988) ...............................................................................................................8 15 O’Connor v. Boeing N. Am., Inc., 16 184 F.R.D. 311 (C.D. Cal. 1998) .........................................................................................................10 17 Ovieda v. Sodexo Operations, LLC, 18 2012 WL 1627237 (C.D. Cal. May 7, 2012) .......................................................................................13 19 Schneider v. Space Systems/Loral, Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19001 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2012) ...................................................................12 20 Spencer v. Virginia State Univ., 21 2019 WL 1233046 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2019) ......................................................................................8, 9 22 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 23 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011) ...................................................................................................................10, 11 24 Werner v. Advance Newhouse P’ship, LLC, 2013 WL 4487475 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2013) .......................................................................................7 25 State Cases 26 Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist., 27 2 Cal. 4th 962 (1992) .............................................................................................................................3 28 ii DEFENDANT HPE’S MPA IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER / CASE NO. 18 CV 337830 53729353v.12 1 Bockrath v. Aldrich Chem. Co., 21 Cal. 4th 71 (1999) .............................................................................................................................6 2 Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Ct., 3 53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012) .................................................................................................................10, 12 4 Doe v. City of Los Angeles, 5 42 Cal. 4th 531 (2007) .....................................................................................................................5, 12 6 Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine, Ltd., 169 Cal. App. 4th 1524 (2008) ............................................................................................................10 7 Green v. Par Pools, Inc., 8 111 Cal. App. 4th 620 (2003) ................................................................................................................8 9 Guardian North Bay, Inc. v. Superior Court, 10 94 Cal. App. 4th 963 (2001) ..................................................................................................................3 11 Khoury v. Maly’s of Cal., 14 Cal. App. 4th 612 (1993) ..................................................................................................................3 12 Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co., 13 23 Cal.4th 429 (2000) ............................................................................................................................4 14 McKenney v. Purepac Pharm. Co., 15 167 Cal. App. 4th 72 (2008) ..................................................................................................................3 16 Morgan v. Wet Seal, Inc., 210 Cal. App. 4th 1341 (2012) ............................................................................................................12 17 Price v. Starbucks Corp., 18 192 Cal.App.4th 1136 (2011) ..............................................................................................................10 19 Rakestraw v. Cal. Physicians’ Serv., 20 81 Cal. App. 4th 39 (2000) ....................................................................................................................3 21 Schermer v. Tatum, 245 Cal. App. 4th 912 (2016) ................................................................................................................4 22 Seastrom v. Neways, Inc., 23 149 Cal. App. 4th 1496 (2007) ............................................................................................................14 24 Ticconi v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. Co., 160 Cal.App.4th 528 (2008) ................................................................................................................10 25 26 Tucker v. Pacific Bell Mobile Services,