![Abnormal Small Bowel Permeability and Duodenitis in Recurrent Abdominal Pain](https://data.docslib.org/img/3a60ab92a6e30910dab9bd827208bcff-1.webp)
Archives ofDisease in Childhood 1990; 65: 1311-1314 1311 Abnormal small bowel permeability and duodenitis Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.65.12.1311 on 1 December 1990. Downloaded from in recurrent abdominal pain S B van der Meer, P P Forget, J W Arends Abstract assess the value of 5"Cr-EDTA permeability Thirty nine children with recurrent abdominal tests of intestinal inflammation. As the absorp- pain aged between 5.5 and 12 years, underwent tion of 51Cr-EDTA takes place predominantly endoscopic duodenal biopsy to find out if in the small bowel,'2 duodenal biopsies from 39 there were any duodenal inflammatory patients with recurrent abdominal pain were changes, and if there was a relationship examined for the presence of inflammatory between duodenal inflammation and intestinal changes. permeability to 5tCr-EDTA. Duodenal in- flammation was graded by the duodenitis scale of Whitehead et al (grade 0, 1, 2, and 3). Patients and methods In 13 out of 39 patients (33%) definite signs of During a prospective study 106 children with inflammation were found (grade 2 and 3). recurrent abdominal pain were investigated Intestinal permeability to 5tCr-EDTA in according to a standard protocol. Patients were patients with duodenitis (grade 1, 2, and 3) diagnosed as having recurrent abdominal pain if was significantly higher (4-42 (1-73)%) than in they were aged between 5 5 and 12 years; had patients with normal (grade 0) duodenal had recurrent abdominal pain for at least six biopsy appearances (3.3 (0-9)%). A significant months; had had attacks of pain varying in association was found between duodenal in- severity, duration, and frequency; and if their flammation and abnormal intestinal per- attacks were sometimes accompanied by pale- meability. Our results give further evidence ness, nausea, and vomiting. These criteria are in that there is an intestinal origpn of these accordance with those first laid down by patients' complaints. Apley,' 2 except for the duration of the com- plaints, for which we felt that a six month period was more justifiable. All children referred About 10-15% ofchildren ofschool age regularly to our outpatient clinics with recurrent complain of abdominal pain. ' 2 In most cases no abdominal pain and those admitted to the underlying cause can be found. In a large study paediatric ward who met the inclusion criteria, done in 1958 Apley claimed to be able to find were admitted to the study. All children were http://adc.bmj.com/ somatic causes, such as urinary tract infections referred to us by their family doctors or by and peptic ulcers, in only 10% of the patients.2 school doctors. Both groups of colleagues were Since then various other possible causes have informed about the study. All parents gave been suggested, including lactose intolerance,3 informed consent, in only two cases did the abnormal gastroduodenal motility,4 and even parents refuse to take part. 'appendiceal colic'.5 Much attention has been The protocol consisted of a standard physical drawn by psychosocial conditions as a potential examination; routine laboratory investigations on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. cause of the complaints.6 7 Case controlled of blood, faeces, and urine, and a standard studies, however, have not established a clear ultrasound examination ofthe abdomen. Lactose relationship between abdominal pain and tolerance was tested with an oral lactose load of psychosocial conditions.8 9 2 g/kg body weight, with a maximum of 50 g. In a previous study we report abnormal Breath samples were analysed at 30 minute intestinal permeability in children with recur- intervals for two hours, with a Lactoscreen rent abdominal pain, using orally administered (HoekLoos). Hydrogen content of breath 5"Cr-EDTA as a marker.'0 In 54% of our samples was considered abnormal if it exceeded patients we found that the 5'Cr-EDTA excre- 20 ppm. tion was more than 3-5%, considered to be the The 5'Cr-EDTA permeability test was done upper limit of the reference range in children." as previously described.'0 Briefly, after an As the urinary excretion of "Cr-EDTA has overnight fast a dose of 100 RtCu 51Cr-EDTA Academic Hospital been shown to be abnormal in several conditions was given orally in 10 ml of 5% glucose. Urine Maastricht, POB 1918, known to be associated mucosal 6201 BX Maastricht, with inflam- was collected for 24 hours. Urine volumes were The Netherlands, mation such as coeliac disease," Crohn's measured and two samples of 5 ml each were Department of disease,12 and gastroenteritis,13 we suggested counted in a well counter. A standard 1/100 Paediatrics that intestinal inflammation may be present in dilution of 5 ml was similarly counted. Radio- S B van der Meer P P Forget our patients with recurrent abdominal pain. We activity excreted in the urine over a period of 24 Department of Pathology had no histological evidence to support this hours was expressed as a percentage of the oral J W Arends hypothesis, however. The purpose of the dose. In a previous paper, our control group of Correspondence to: present study therefore was to find out the children showed a mean (2SD) 51Cr-EDTA Dr van der Meer. incidence of intestinal inflammation in our excretion of 2-5 (1-3)%.'3 We therefore chose a Accepted 7 July 1990 patients with recurrent abdominal pain and to cut off value of 3-8% to evaluate the relationship 1312 van derMeer, Forget, Arends Tabk I Clinical features of children with recurrent abdominal pain Table 4 Relationship between 5'Cr-EDTA test results and duodenal inflammatory changes Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.65.12.1311 on 1 December 1990. Downloaded from Duodenal biopsy No duodenal biopsy (n=39) (n=67) 5'Cr-EDTA excretion (%) Total Sex (male/female) 15/24 23/44* <3-80o >3-80/. Mean age at entry (years) 8-25 9-23* Range 5-9-14 5-5-12-4 Grade 0 9 2 11 Mean duration of complaints (months) 26-8 19-4* Grade 1, 2, 3 12 16 28 Range 6-120 6-80 21 18 39 Mean No of attacks/week 4 3.9* Range Once a month-every day Once a month-every day Relationship between abnormal small bowel permeability and Mean duration of attacks (hours) 6-3 5-3* duodenal inflammation: p=003 (Fisher's test, single tailed). Range 5 min-all day 5 min-all day *No significant differences between groups (Wilcoxon test). meability and duodenal biopsy results are between small bowel permeability and duodenal reported in the present paper. inflammatory changes. Clinical details regarding our patients are shown in table 1. Of 106 patients with recurrent Results abdominal pain, 39 underwent endoscopy and Of the 39 patients who underwent duodenal biopsy of the duodenum. Duodenal biopsy biopsy, 13 (33%) showed microscopically specimens were taken after an overnight fast obvious signs of inflammation (10 and three from the proximal duodenum with an Olympus with Whitehead grades 2 and 3, respectively), GIF XP1O endoscope. All patients were sedated 15 (38%) showed minimal changes (grade 1), with midazolam (Dormicum) and atropine. One whereas in 11 patients (28%) the biopsy speci- or two biopsy specimens from each patient were mens looked normal (grade 0). A simultaneous immediately placed in Bouin fixative. After antral biopsy was taken from 11 of these embedding in paraffin they were cut into 4 [im patients; in eight cases (73%) Helicobacter pylori sections and stained with a haematoxylin and colonisation was detected on histological ex- eosin. The most representative, well orientated amination (three with grade 0, one with grade 1, sections were used for grading. Histological 2 with grade 2, and two with grade 3 duodenitis). grading of duodenal inflammation was done Histological evidence of gastritis was present in according to the criteria laid down by Whitehead four (50%) of the patients in whom H pylori was et al. 14 The histological sections were examined found. The combination of gastritis and duo- by a pathologist who had no knowledge of the denitis was present in three of the eight patients clinical or endoscopic findings. All sections in whom H pylori was found. Results of 24 were reviewed for this study by the same hours 51Cr-EDTA excretion in all our 106 observer (JWA). patients with recurrent abdominal pain are Although a certain bias may have been presented in table 2. In six cases either the introduced in the group of patients (n=39) who parents refused the test or urine sampling underwent duodenal biopsy (37% of the total failed. The mean 5tCr-EDTA excretion values http://adc.bmj.com/ study group), there appeared to be no signifi- of patients with varying degrees of duodenal cant differences between the two groups in inflammation are shown in table 3. The 51Cr- clinical data (table 1) or 5'Cr-EDTA excretion EDTA excretion of patients with grade 1 (table 2). There was, however, a tendency duodenal inflammation was significantly higher towards higher 51Cr-EDTA excretion values than that of patients with grade 0 (p<002, and a slightly longer duration of complaints in Student's t test). Most notably, no differences the group that underwent biopsy. with 2 or were found between patients grade on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Only the results concerning intestinal per- grade 3 on the one hand, and grade 0 on the other. The mean 51Cr-EDTA excretion of patients with normal findings (grade 0), how- ever, was significantly lower than that of Table 2 Urinary s5Cr-EDTA excretion in different groups of patients patients with grades 1, 2, and 3 taken together AU patients Duodenal No duodenal (p<005, Student's t test).
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages4 Page
-
File Size-