PRE-DESCEMET’S ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY (PDEK) AMAR AGARWAL Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has evolved at a brisk pace and the volume of data accumulated over the past 10 years has demonstrated that all the posterior lamellar techniques of endothelial replacement yield far superior visual, topographic, and tectonic results compared with penetrating keratoplasty.1 We report a novel method of endothelial keratoplasty in which the endothelium and Descemet’smembrane (DM) along with the Pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer-PDL) is transplanted and term it as Pre-Descemet’s Endothelial Keratoplasty (PDEK). Early evidence to support the existence of a distinct pre-Descemet’s layer of tissue was presented by Dua et al2 in 2007 and followed by a detailed paper wherein evidence is presented to further support the presence of the distinct PDL. In PDEK procedure, this layer is included with the endothelium–DM complex thereby providing additional support to the graft. Presence of this layer with its characteristics of relative rigidity and toughness allows easy intraoperative handling and insertion of the tissue as itdoes not tend to scroll as much as the DM alone. The most popular in ‘DM barring’techniques is the big bubble (BB) method where the BB forms a cleavage plane,leaving the DM bare for the dissection in lamellar keratoplasties. This entails thecreation of Type 2 BB where the bubble forms between the PDL and the DM. InPDEK procedure, Type 1 BB2 is formed which typically lies between the PDL and theresidual corneal stroma; thereby creating a dome of PDL-DM-Endothelial complex above the air bubble. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: DONOR GRAFT GRAFT PREPARATION A corneo-scleral disc with an approximately 2 mm scleral rim is dissectedfrom the whole globe or obtained from an eye bank. A 30- gauge needle attached toa syringe is inserted from the limbus into the mid peripheral stroma (Fig 1 Top left, Top middle). Air is slowly injected into the donor stroma till a type 1 big bubble is formed which is a well-circumscribed, central dome shaped elevation measuring 7 to 8.5 mm in diameter (Fig.1 Top right, Bottom left). It always starts in the center and enlarges centrifugally retaining a circular configuration. Trephination of the donor graft is done along the margin of the big bubble (Fig 1Bottom middle). The bubble wall is penetrated at the extreme periphery and trypan blue is injected into the bubble to stain the graft, which is then cut all around the trephine mark with a pair of corneo-scleral scissors (Fig.1Bottom right) and is covered with the tissue culture medium. The graft is loaded in to an injector when ready for insertion. RECIPIENT BED PREPARATION After administering peribulbar anesthesia; the recipient corneal epithelium is debrided (if grossly edematous) (Fig 2 Top left) for better visualization. A trephine mark is made on the recipient cornea respective to the diameter of DM to be scored on the endothelial side (Fig 2 Top middle). A 2.8 mm tunnel incision is made at 10 o’clock hours near the limbus. The anterior chamber (AC) is formed and maintained with saline injection or infusion. The margin of DM to be removed is scored initially from the endothelial side with a reverse Sinskey hook (Fig 2 Top right). Once an adequate edge is lifted, a non-toothed forceps is used to gently grab the DM at its very edge and the graft is separated from the underlying stroma in a capsulorhexis like circumferential manner. The peeled DM is then removed from the eye. DONOR LENTICULE IMPLANTATION Donor lenticule (endothelium-DM-pre Descemet’s layer) roll is inserted in the custom made injector (Fig 2 Bottom left) and slowly pushed up the lumen of the nozzle. The injector is improvised from an intraocular lens implant injector by removing the sponge tire and spring and re-attaching the sponge tire, to prevent any back suction and inadvertent damage to the donor graft. Using the injector, the graft roll is injected in a controlled fashion into the AC. The donor graft is oriented endothelial side down and positioned on to the recipient posterior stroma by careful, indirect manipulation of the tissue with air and fluid (Fig 2 Bottom middle). Once the lenticule is unrolled, an air bubble is injected underneath the donor graft lenticule to lift it towards the recipient posterior stroma. The AC is completely filled with air for the next 30 minutes followed by an air–liquid exchange to pressurize the eye (Fig 2 Bottom right). Eye speculum is finally removed and AC is examined for air position. The patient is advised to lie in a strictly supine position for next 3 hours. PDEK entails the inclusion of the PDL in the donor graft; thereby providing the benefits of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) like speedy visual recovery and overcoming the disadvantages posed by DMEK. PDEK takes ultra thin- Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSEK) to a “thinner level” whilst retaining its advantages but not requiring sophisticated instrumentation and keratome. The spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in vivo analysis of PDEK grafts showed mean graft thickness after 1 month to be 28±5.6microns which is larger than the conventional DMEK graft and lesser than the ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft. In PDEK, the additional layer thickness with endothelium-DM complex is lesser than the overall thickness of the DSEK or ultrathin DSAEK graft. This is compatible with a faster visual recovery. A comparison of the preoperative and postoperative clinical slit lamp pictures of the eye along with OCT images show a clear graft on the first postoperative day (Fig 3). Some aspects of the different endothelial keratoplasty techniques are demonstrated in Table 1. Long term studies evaluating different parameters such as endothelial cell loss over time, interface, detachment rates and final visual acuity including higher order aberrations and contrast sensitivity are required to establish a place for PDEK in corneal transplantation surgery REFERENCES: 1. Terry MA. Endothelial Keratoplasty: Why Aren’t We All Doing Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?.Cornea. 2012; 31 (5) 469:471. 2. Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J.Human Corneal Anatomy Redefined: A Novel Pre-Descemet's Layer (Dua's Layer). Ophthalmology.2013 Sep;120(9):1778-85. LEGENDS FOR FIGURES: Figure 1: Pre-Descemet’s endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) donor graft preparation. Top left: A 30G needle inserted at the limbus on the endothelial side Top middle: Needle advanced into the stroma Top right: Intrastromal air injection Bottom left: Central dome shaped Type-1 big bubble formed Bottom middle: Trephination of endothelial graft performed Bottom right: Endothelial-Descemet’s membrane (DM) complex with pre-Descemet’s layer stained with trypan blue and cut with corneo-scleral scissors FIGURE #1 Figure 2: Recipient bed preparation and Graft insertion. Top left: Preoperative image of the eye with endothelial decompensation. Epithelium debridement being done. Top middle: Trephine marking done on cornea. Top right: DM scored and stripped with reverse Sinskey hook. Bottom left: Graft lenticule is loaded into an injector Bottom middle: Intraoperative manipulation of the graft for proper positioning. Bottom right: Air injected underneath the donor graft lenticule to lift it towards the recipient posterior stroma. Anterior chamber filled with air. FIGURE #2 Figure 3: Preoperative, postoperative and Optical coherence tomography (OCT) picture (day one) of a PDEK case. FIGURE #3 CORNEAL SURGERIES AND GLUED IOL DR.AMAR AGARWAL The past decade has seen a paradigm shift in the management of corneal disorders from PKP (penetrating keratoplasty) to endothelial keratoplasties; and in the management of secondary intraocular (IOL) implantation from conventional sutured scleral fixation and iris retro-claw fixation to sutureless glued intrascleral IOL implantation. It is the conviction and transition that is responsible for the eventual revolutionary overthrow of the incumbent paradigm, and its replacement by a new one. Amalgamating the benefits of both these advancements can harvest and reap lot of benefit to the current select scenario of patients. Post-traumatic cases with corneal opacities and lenticular disruption/ dislocation is an ideal scenario to take precedence for glued iol with corneal surgical intervention. Complicated cataract surgeries associated with posterior capsule rupture often lead to corneal decompensation. Corneal oedema and decompensation results from failure of the corneal endothelium to maintain deturgescence. The visual function of the five-layered cornea is dependent upon its shape and clarity. And each layer serves a vital role to its end. Corneal decompensation beginning many years after IOL implantation may be due to excessive loss of endothelium at the time of surgery, followed by ongoing normal or accelerated attrition of the remaining endothelium. With the recent explosion of keratoplasty techniques for the treatment of corneal diseases, determining when to perform corrective surgery for IOL implantation in the setting of corneal disease is crucial for appropriate surgical planning. Glued IOL has been used previously in multiple situations including surgical aphakia, traumatic phacocele, dislocated IOL in bag, and in combination with femtosecond assisted keratoplasty. This chapter discusses considerations for deciding Glued IOL implantation along with the appropriate corneal procedure to be implemented for the remedy of corneal disorder. The last decade has heralded a revolutionary shift in the treatment of corneal endothelial disease. Only 15 years ago, the only surgical treatment for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and Fuchs dystrophy was penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Although used successfully for over a century, PK requires many months of refractive adjustments before the eye achieves visual stability. Starting with the advent of posterior lamellar keratoplasty in the late 1990s, a number of procedures have been developed, refined, and widely adopted, which have given patients faster recoveries and improved globe stability in comparison to traditional corneal transplantation.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages15 Page
-
File Size-