Relationship Between Napier Number E and Pi Without I

Relationship Between Napier Number E and Pi Without I

Relationship between Napier number e and Pi without i April 17, 2019 Yuji Masuda Bachelor of Mechanical Systems Engineering in Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology I am Yuji Masuda from Japan. I have a job of lending rooms to companies, which called “share office or share w ork place”. And I am working there as an hourly-employee. The length √x, that x is a prime number, can be set in a geometric pattern composed of circles with a diameter 1. And in many lines or curves through the center of circles of prime, some limited conditions, which is on the center of the circles of x=3 and 7(Fig.1), shows some graphs. Especially, graph of Gauss’ prime number theorem. which meets the limited condition, shows relationship between Napier number e and π without imaginary number i. Key Words : Napier number e, π, imaginary unit i 1. Introduction 4.Formula about Napier number e and pi without i. There is unknown area in prime numbers. Therefore, this I thought about b of the equation below. research aimed to deepen knowledge on unknown areas through a 1 basic research on prime numbers. e = (∵ a = e 3 + b) log( a) 2. Geometric pattern and limited condition And as a result , 1 14 a = e 3 + b∵ b = The center of a circle with a close-packed structure of a circle 15 with a radius of 1/2 is set as the O, is focused on x at a distance a ≅ e √ x from O. log( a) The limited the condition is go through the centers of two And I thought two things below. circles of x=3&7. 2 1 3 = ⋯ ≅ 10 − 1 1 : e .3 17307306 x π 100 x 1 1 2 2 O e 3 1 2 = .9 96850302 ⋯ ≅ π π × 3 ≅ π 2 : 1 e , π 1 log ()π ≅ 3 1 1 Here, I noticed below. 4 3 4 1 = .1 74713705 ⋯ ≅ 14 − 2 9 7 7 9 log ()π 16 13 12 13 16 14 × log ()π = .2 14159352 ⋯ ≅ π −1 25 21 19 19 21 25 36 31 28 27 28 31 36 And after trial & error, I could finally get the 49 43 39 37 37 39 43 49 following equation. π 64 57 52 49 48 49 52 57 64 81 73 67 63 61 61 63 67 73 81 B A ⋅ π B π +()() − a1 + − a1 ⋅ ⋅ 1 1 A π Fig.1 two curves which one meets the limited conditions a2 a2 B π +()() −1 + −1 ⋅A ⋅ π a3 a3 π +()()() −1 + −1 ()A ⋅ ⋯ and another doesn’t meet it. = −1 (1) 3.Curve of Gauss’ prime number theorem graph First, I thought of some quadratic curves. However, it did (∵ 14⋅ ln()π −π = A, 14⋅ ln()π +1 = B) (∵ a =p ± ,1 n =2p ⋅()() 2 ⋅q + ,1 ∵ p, q = int eger ) not give a desired result. n Second, I considered a curve of Gauss’ prime number 5.Conclusion theorem graph. The equation (1) that I found shows the relationship between x=1.78131217...on the curve which meets the limited Napier number e and π . Furthermore, the equation (1) x condition x : = 1: 3 doesn’t include imaginary unit i of e^(iπ)= −1.[1] log( x) 1 log( x) = 6.References 3 1 [1]. 新装版 オイラーの贈物ー人類の至宝 e^i π=−1 を学ぶ x = e 3 = 1.78131217 ⋯ 吉田武(著) 2010 年 1 月 1 日 Next, I considered more deeply about the curve of the Gauss (New edition Euler's gift-The treasure of humanity. Learn e ^ i π = 1. prime theorem graph. Takeshi Yoshida. 2010 Jan 1)(by google translation).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us