Congress of Vienna

Congress of Vienna

CONGRESS OF VIENNA MUNUC 32 UPDATE PAPER Introduction to Nobility Understanding the Noble system is important to understanding hierarchy and alliances in Europe. Generally, land is organized as a ‘title’ which is presented to a family. These titles confer corresponding noble ranks upon their holder. The titles as well are arranged in a hierarchy, with larger titles usually including a series of enfiefed smaller titles below it. For example, an Empire may have several Kingdoms and numerous Duchies inside of it associated with its title. A generalized set of titles and the title-holder nomenclatures is giving below in descending order: 1. Empire - Emperor / Empress 2. Kingdom - King / Queen 3. Archduchy - Archduke / Archduchess 4. Grand Duchy - Grand Duke / Grand Duchess 5. Duchy - Duke / Duchess 6. County - Count / Countess 7. Barony - Baron / Baroness There are also cases where land is held by Christian theocratic leadership corresponding to ecclesiastical position: 1. Prince Archbishopric - Prince Archbishop (Compare to Duchy level title) 2. Prince Bishopric - Prince Bishop (Compare to County level title) 3. Prince Abbot - Prince Abbot (Compare to Barony title) Certain titles were bestowed as a reward for bureaucratic service or to recognize the non-successive low nobility. These titles did not bestow any land rights: 1. Marquis / Marquess 2. Viscount / Viscountess 3. Baronet / Baronetess 4. Master (Mr.) / Mistress (Ms. or Mrs.) Usage of these titles varied from culture to culture, and each title has different terminology in different languages ex. Herzog, Graf, and Freiherr are Duke, Count, and Baron in German. Titles could be held in the plural, united by only their monarch. For example, the Kings of Great Britain were also the Prince-Electors of Hanover, and the Danish Kings held the Kingdom of Norway and Duchy of Holstein as well. In this case, the multiple titles were held in Personal Union, such that they could have separate de jure laws, succession, and assemblies if applicable while united by the same Monarch. This led to the strongest form of alliance between states, while still permitting legal and cultural differences. In our own timeline, Hanover and Britain split when Queen Victoria ascended to the British throne, as the constitution of Hanover did not permit women (Cognatic) in succession. Generally in Europe, the transfer of titles was dictated by an agnatic primogeniture succession, wherein the eldest male child of the direct line inherited the full title of his father. 2 However, there are instances where other children were eligible to inherit. For example, certain succession laws utilized agnatic gavelkind, where all male children received a share of the titles. Primogeniture usually secured larger unified realms, whereas gavelkind caused the mass fragmentation observed in the old HRE. There are also instances where a noble could choose to land a second or third son by granting them a different title than that of the primary successor. This established what is known as a Cadet Branch. The Cadet line, while still part of the dynasty, usually received a new noble name based on their title, or sometimes indicated by a hyphen. Due to the longevity of the lines, this can sometimes be quite confusing. For example, the House of Bourbon (Congress: France, Spain, Naples) is really a Cadet line of the Capetian Dynasty, but is significant enough to just be called Bourbon for their original ducal title in France. In comparison, the Romanovs of the Russian Empire are sometimes demarcated as Holstein- Gottorp-Romanov, indicating they descend from Holstein-Gottorp. However, the Holstein- Gottorps are themselves a Cadet Branch of the House of Oldenburg. To further complicate this, the Danish Monarch is also a member of the Oldenburg Dynasty by the route of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, usually just called the House of Glücksburg. Like I said, very confusing to the normal modern American reader. To help simplify this, the Monarchies are listed, with Dynasty preceding Cadet nomenclature if applicable. Dynastic Relations are suggested. The conventional name is bolded: • Austrian Empire: o [Habsburg]-Lorraine o Dynastic Relations: France (mother) 3 • Russian Empire: o [Oldenburg]-Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov o Dynastic Relations: Wurttemberg (mother), Baden (marriage), Sweden (kin) , Prussia (betrothal) , Denmark (Distant kin) • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland o [Brunswick-Lüneburg]-Hanover o Held in personal union over Hanover o Dynastic Relations: Mecklenburg (cousin in-law), Denmark (cousin), Wurttemberg (in- law) • Kingdom of Prussia o [Hohenzollern] o Dynastic Relations: Russia (betrothal) , Netherlands (in-law, cousin) • Kingdom of France o [Capet]-Bourbon o Dynastic Relations: Saxony (mother), Sardinia (marriage) Spain (kin), Sicily (kin) • Kingdom of Portugal o [Burgundy]-Aviz-Braganza o Dynastic Relations: Spain (regent marriage) • Kingdom of Spain o [Capet]-Bourbon-Anjou o Dynastic Relations: Portugal (marriage), France (kin), Sicily (kin), Sardinia (nephew) • Kingdom of Sweden o Heir Apparent: [Bernadotte] o Heir Pretender: [Oldenburg]-Holstein-Gottorp 4 ▪ Dynastic Relations: Baden (Mother), Russia (kin), Denmark (distant kin) • Kingdom of Denmark o [Oldenburg] o Dynastic Relations: Great Britain (Mother), Russia (distant kin), Sweden (distant kin) • Kingdom of the Netherlands o [Nassau]-Orange o Dynastic Relations: Prussia (marriage, mother) • Southern Netherlands o Not its own monarchy, held by Austrian Habsburg-Lorraines • Duchy of Warsaw o [Wettin] o Held in personal union under Saxony • Kingdom of Saxony o [Wettin] o Held in personal union over Warsaw o Dynastic Relations: France (cousin), Bavaria (marriage, mother) , Sicily (nephew) • Swiss Confederation o Cantonal Confederation, no Monarch • Kingdom of Bavaria o [Wittelsbach]-Palatinate-Zweibrücken-Birkenfeld o Dynastic Relations: Saxony (in-law, cousin), Baden (marriage) • Kingdom of Wurttemberg o [Wurttemberg] o Dynastic Relations: Russia (in-law), Great Britain (marriage) 5 • Kingdom of Hanover o [Brunswick-Lüneburg]-Hanover o Held in personal union under Great Britain • Grand Duchy of Baden o [Zähringen]-Baden o Dynastic Relations: Bavaria (in-law), Russia (in-law), Sweden (in-law) • Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg-Schwerin o [Mecklenburg]-Schwerin o Dynastic Relations: Great Britain (cousin in-law) • Papal States o Papal Succession, no Monarch • Republic of Genoa o Republic, no Monarch • Kingdom of Sardinia o [Savoy] o Dynastic Relations: France (in-law), Spain (mother) • Kingdom of Sicily o [Capet]-Bourbon-Anjou o Dynastic Relations: Saxony (mother), Spain (kin), France (kin) • Kingdom of Naples o Apparent: [Murat] o Pretender: [Capet]-Bourbon-Anjou (Sicily) 6 The extent to which these noble relations are relevant to the politics of committee is an open question for Congress delegates, but they should assume that other states of their noble house or married to it would serve as safer allies. Delegates can also choose to place members of any dynasty on any open or invented titles if the Congress approves. 7 Potential Saturday Open Session Topics The dais may choose to introduce an update at the beginning of the open session in addition to any uncovered agenda items. The following two topics are also interesting topics relevant for Congress decisions if delegates are interested. The Eastern Question The ease Napoleon’s invasion of Ottoman Egypt has brought to attention the apparent decay of the ages-old empire. Russian marines, working alongside the Ottoman Navy during the first conquest of the Ionian Isles, also noticed the increasing corruption and ineptitude of the Janissary Corps that had once threatened even Vienna just some two hundred years ago. Meanwhile, a significant revolution has gripped the Ottoman Pashalik of Serbia for the last decade. The Serbian revolutionaries have beaten back the Ottoman forces multiple times and are asserting newfound sovereignty from their capital at Belgrade. The Congress could choose to intervene in this situation. The first question is whether Europe ought to intervene at all. The Serbians are fellow Christians and have been under Ottoman domination long enough. However, with the Napoleonic Wars having only just concluded, it is an open question of whether possible conflict with the Turks is worth it, and if so, whose militaries would be committed. If intervention is chosen, there is also the question of which Serbian leadership the Congress would like to support. Two rivals are jockeying for control of the revolution, and the winner is likely to become Serbia’s founding father. One option is Đorđe Petrović, known for his nickname Karađorđe (Black George), who fought the Ottomans initially in a volunteer 8 corps for the Austrian Military. The other is Miloš Obrenović, a civil leader in Serbia with contacts in the Russian Empire. Who we select will likely have dramatic implications for the future of Serbian, and possibly Balkan, history. Freedom of Trade Trade has recently become a fundamental element of state capacity. Numerous countries now fund their development and government budgets with the coin made from colonial exploitation and trade tariffing. Both blockades and key battles throughout the Napoleonic Era such as the battles for Malta and Egypt demonstrated the value of controlling the avenues of trade. Recognizing this reality, the Congress has an opportunity to intervene and set new trade rules for Europe. As a general rule, increased trade liberalization can benefit everyone, but

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us